Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 27, 2025
Accepted
August 21, 2025
Published
October 25, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 58 Download : 44

Main Article Content

Abstract

Numeracy literacy skills are abilities that need to be trained and developed, focusing on understanding concepts and mathematical calculations as well as their application in the process of contextual problem-solving. Specifically, the level of numeracy literacy in each school in Indonesia has not yet been identified, particularly in the context of reaction rates in chemistry, which is rarely analyzed. Therefore, this study aims to describe the overall level of students' numeracy literacy on the topic of reaction rates, based on numeracy literacy indicators, gender, and cognitive aspects in Bloom's taxonomy. This research employs a descriptive quantitative approach, involving 60 students as subjects. The research instrument consisted of 20 essay questions about numeracy literacy skills related to the topic of reaction rates, with a reliability of 0.817, categorized as very high. The research results indicate that, overall, the level of numeracy literacy on the topic of reaction rates remains low, with a percentage of 37.74%. Based on indicators, (1) the ability to analyze information in the form of tables, graphs, diagrams, and charts reached 47.09%; (2) the use of numbers and symbols was 36.07%; (3) interpreting analysis results to make decisions was 34.28%. Based on gender, male students achieved a rate of 39.61%, while female students achieved a rate of 37.06%. Based on cognitive aspects in Bloom's Taxonomy, C4 (analyzing) achieved the highest score of 50.44%, followed by C5 (evaluating) at 32.08%, C3 (applying) at 29.70%, and C6 (creating) at 21.50. These findings emphasize the importance of improving numeracy literacy skills in Indonesia, especially in chemistry education. These results can also serve as a basis for teachers in designing learning strategy policies by integrating numerical skills, data interpretation, and logical reasoning to enhance students' numeracy literacy in chemistry learning more broadly.

Keywords

numeracy literacy reaction rate gender bloom’s taxonomy

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Niken Yuhana Pertiwi, Ivan Ashif Ardhana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the simultaneously licenced under A Creative Commons Attribution (CC-By-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the worsk's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Pertiwi, N. Y., & Ardhana, I. A. (2025). Analysis of Numeracy Literacy Ability of 11th Grade Students on Reaction Rate Material at SMAN 1 Grogol. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 9(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol9.iss2.art7
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. A. Winata, I. S. R. Widiyanti, and Sri Cacik, “Analisis Kemampuan Numerasi dalam Pengembangan Soal Asesmen Kemampuan Minimal pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA untuk Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Science,” J. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 498–508, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i2.1090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i2.1090
  2. “Perilisan Hasil PISA 2022: Peringkat Indonesia Naik 5–6 Posisi,” Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://pusmendik.kemdikbud.go.id/konten/perilisan-hasil-pisa-2022-peringkat-indonesia-naik-5-6-posisi (Accesed: July 2025).
  3. N. Z. Salvia, F. P. Sabrina, and I. Maula, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Peserta Didik Ditinjau dari Kecemasan Matematika,” ProSANDIKA UNIKAL (Prosiding Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Mat. Univ. Pekalongan), vol. 3, no. 1, p. 352, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.proceeding.unikal.ac.id/index.php/sandika/article/view/890
  4. L. Darmastuti, Meiliasari, and W. Rahayu, “Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi: Materi, Kondisi Siswa, dan Pendekatan Pembelajarannya,” J. Ris. Pembelajaran Mat. Sekol., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 17, 2024,doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.081.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.081.03
  5. A. Asrijanty, Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) dan implikasinya pada pembelajaran, Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, Jakarta, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/19690/.
  6. A. J. Khumairoh and I. A. Ardhana, “Scientific Literacy Skills Profiles of Eleven Grade Students on Reaction Rates Topic,” J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kim., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 75, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/j-pek/article/view/54406.
  7. R. F. Herawati, S. Mulyani, and T. Redjeki, “Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Multiple Representasi Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal terhadap Prestasi Belajar Laju Reaksi Siswa SMA Negeri I Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012,” J. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 38, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.3.215-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.3.215-222
  8. A. Rosyada, S. Priatmoko, E. Susilaningsih, and S. Wardani, “Pengembangan Soal AKM Literasi Membaca & Numerasi Terintegrasi HOTS Materi Laju Reaksi,” Chem. Educ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 180–188, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/chemined/article/view/69687
  9. I. S. Fauziah and I. A. Ardhana, “Numerical Capacity Profile of Eleventh-Grade High School Students in Stoichiometry,” J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia)., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 10, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/j-pek/article/view/54362
  10. S. Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian, 14th ed. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
  11. A. Fadillah and Ni’mah, “Analisis Literasi Matematika Siswa dalam Memecahkan Soal Matematika PISA Konten Change and Relationship,” JTAM (Jurnal Teor. dan Apl. Mat)., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 127–131, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/jtam/article/view/1035.
  12. E. Afriani, E. Susilaningsih, S. Haryani, and A. T. Prasetya, “Analisis Kompetensi Minimum Siswa pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam melalui Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Bermuatan AKM dengan Konteks Saintifik Daily Life,” Chemined., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 167–169, 2023,doi: 10.21009/cend.v12i2.12 [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/chemined/article/view/69259
  13. Sudirman, E. Cahyono, and Kadir, “Analisis Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa SMP Pesisir Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender,” Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 11–12, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JPBM/article/view/5729
  14. S. Hartatik and Nafi’ah, “Kemampuan Numerasi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Profesi Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembang. Mns., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v5i1.1456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v5i1.1456
  15. Nursyamsudin and M. N. G. Jaelani, Penguatan Literasi dan Numerasi. Jakarta Selatan: Direktorat Sekolah Menengah Atas, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sma.dikdasmen.go.id/data/files/buku/Penguatan_literasi_dan_numerasi_di_SMA.pdf.
  16. I. Suprapto, “Kompetensi Literasi Membaca dan Literasi Matematika (Numerasi) dalam AKM,” Disdik.Purwakartakab.go.id, Nov. 2020.
  17. Napsiyah, Nurmaningsih, and R. Haryadi, “Analisis Kemampuan Numerasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Level Kognitif pada Materi Kubus dan Balok,” JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matemaika dan IPA vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 103–117, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v2i2.183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v2i2.183
  18. Alfarisi, C. W. Suryaningrum, and H. P. E. Firdaus, “Analisis Kemampuan Numerasi Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah TIMSS Ditinjau dari Gender,” Delta-Pi: J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 64–78, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33387/dpi.v12i1.6046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33387/dpi.v12i1.6046
  19. R. Pakpahan, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Capaian Literasi Matematika Siswa Indonesia dalam Pisa 2012,” JPNK., vol. 1, no. 3, p. 337, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v1i3.496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v1i3.496
  20. T. Hardianti, “Analisis Kemampuan Peserta Didik pada Ranah Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran Fisika SMA,” Medan, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://seminar.uad.ac.id/index.php/quantum.
  21. L. A. Al-bukhori and Purwanto, “Mempertanyakan Sepuluh Tahun Pengukuran Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Geografi di Indonesia ( 2013-2023 ),” Ganaya J. Ilmu Sos. dan Hum., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 349–372, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v8i1.3765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v8i1.3765
  22. Masganti, Kecerdasan Majemuk: Ruang Lingkup, Indikator, dan Pengembangannya, 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
  23. R. P. Putra, M. A. Yaqin, and A. Saputra, “Objek Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam: Analisis Taksonomi Bloom (Kognitif, Afektif, Psikomotorik),” J. Islam. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 153–154, 2024, https://doi.org/10.56874/eduglobal.v5i1.1590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56874/eduglobal.v5i1.1590