Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 20, 2020
Accepted
April 7, 2021
Published
June 2, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 727 Download : 1583

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between the Regional Representative Council (DPD) and political parties that are often confronted diametrically. The questions presented, what is the historical factor for the formation of the DPD and the comparison of the practices of several countries in relation to regional representative bodies and political parties? What are the prospects for the relationship between the DPD and political parties in the future? This article aims to provide a different perspective on the relationship between the DPD and political parties from the historical, comparative and conception point of regional representation bodies. Through the socio-legal method, it was concluded that, first, historically the formation of the DPD was designed to be filled by individuals, not political parties. However, the practice of some countries shows that regional representative bodies generally cannot be separated from political parties. The lesson is that separating the DPD and political parties "strictly" can be said to always be violated because it is not in accordance with the natural conditions of filling the DPD directly by the people, who are influenced by the strength of the network and political parties. Second, whether or not there are political party affiliations in the DPD will not have a significant impact due to the limited authority of the DPD, so what is needed is the granting of significant DPD authority in the legislative process and supervision through the bicameral model. Thus, the prospect of the relationship between the DPD and political parties in the future can contribute to each other according to the DPD's already significant authority while still providing space for individuals

Keywords

Bi-cameral political parties regional representative council regional elements

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author Biographies

Bagir Manan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

Departemen Hukum Tata Negara

Indra Perwira, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

Departemen Hukum Tata Negara

Mei Susanto, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

Departemen Hukum Tata Negara
How to Cite
Manan, B., Perwira, I., & Susanto, M. (2021). Prospek Relasi Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Dengan Partai Politik. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 28(2), 233–257. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss2.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Australian Government Solicitor, Australia’s Constitution With Overview and Notes by the Ausralian Government Solicitor, Barton, 2010.
  3. Bahar, Saafroedin, A.B. Kusuma, dan Nannie Hudawati, ed., Risalah Sidang Badan Penyelidik Usaha-Usaha Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (BPUPKI), Panitia Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (PPKI), Sekretariat Negara RI, Jakarta, 1995.
  4. Baker, Richard A. “The Senate of the United States.” dalam Second Chambers, diedit oleh R.C. Tripathi, 256–272. Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi, 2002.
  5. Banakar, Reza. Normativity in Legal Sociology: Methodological Reflection in Late Modernity, Normativity in Legal Sociology, Springer, Cham, 2015.
  6. Finer, Herman, The Major Governments of Modern Europe, Methuen, London, 1960.
  7. Harris, Bede, A New Constitution for Australia, Cavendish Publishing Limited, London, 2002.
  8. Irianto, Sulistyowati, "Memperkenalkan Kajian Sosio-Legal dan Implikasi Metodologisnya", dalam Adrian Bedner, dkk. (ed), Kajian Sosio-Legal, Pustaka Larasan, Bali, 2012.
  9. Manan, Bagir, DPR, DPD dan MPR dalam UUD 1945 Baru, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2003.
  10. Moens, Gabriel, John Trone, dan R.D. Lumb, The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia Annotated. Edisi 9, LexisNexis Butterworths, Chatswood DC, 2016.
  11. Risse, Horst, “The Bundesrat in the Legislative Process of Federal Republic of Germany” dalam Second Chambers: Bicameralism Today, diedit oleh R.C. Tripathi, 105–110, Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi, 2002.
  12. Russell, Meg, The Contemporary House of Lords: Westminster Bicameralism Revived, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.
  13. Sharma, S.R., ed., Encyclopaedia of Constitutional Law No. 5, Anmol Publications Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, 2003.
  14. Tim Penyusun Naskah Komprehensif. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasr Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002. Buku III, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2010.
  15. Uhr, John, “Bicameralism”, dalam The Oxford Handbook of Political Institution, diedit oleh R. A. W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder, dan Bert A. Rockman, 476–494, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.
  16. Uslaner, Eric M., dan Thomas Zittal, “Comparative Legislative Behaviour”, dalam The Oxford Handbook of Political Institution, diedit oleh R. A. W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder, dan Bert A. Rockman, 455–473. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  17. Wilson, James Q., John J. Dilulio Jr., dan Meena Bose. American Government: Institutions & Policies, Cengage Learning, Stamford, 2015.
  18. Jurnal dan Makalah
  19. Bagir Manan, "Penelitian Terapan Di Bidang Hukum", Makalah pada Lokakarya Peranan Naskah Akademik Dalam Penyusunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, BPHN, Jakarta, 9-11 Desember 1993.
  20. Enny Nurbaningsih, “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012 dan Alternatif Model Hubungan Kelembagaan Terkait Pembentukan Undang-Undang” Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2015.
  21. Firman Manan, “Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2015.
  22. Jennifer E. Manning, Membership of the 116 th Congress: A Profile. Congressional Research Service, https://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/ R41647.pdf, diakses 20 April 2020.
  23. Meg Russell, “The Territorial Role of Second Chambers.” The Journal of Legislatives Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2001.
  24. Pan Mohamad Faiz dan Muhammad Reza Winata, “Respons Konstitusional Larangan Calon Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah sebagai Pengurus Partai Politik.” Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 16, No. 3, 2019.
  25. Philip Norton, “Adding Value? The Role of Second Chambers.” Asia Pacific Law Review, lVol. 15, No. 1, 2007.
  26. Putu Wawan Suryawan, dan I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi. “Sah Tidaknya Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Masuk Partai Politik.” Kertha Negara 6, No. 3, 2018.
  27. Internet
  28. “Anggota DPD”, https://dpd.go.id/Fanggota/Anggota/34, diakses 20 April 2020.
  29. "Anggota Forbes Haru dan Apresiasi Pemerintah Aceh", http://humas.acehprov.go.id/anggota-forbes-haru-dan-apresiasi-pemerintah-aceh/, diakses 20 Desember 2020.
  30. “Dianggap Galau, Anggota DPD Ramai-Ramai Ke Parpol" https://www.tribunnews.com/ nasional/2017/02/04/dianggap-galau-anggota-dpd-ramai-ramai-ke-parpol, diakses 20 April 2020.
  31. “Jumlah Afiliasi Anggota DPD Dalam Partai Politik”, Indonesian Parliamentary Center, http://ipc.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/garis.jpg, diakses 20 April 2020.
  32. "Ketua MPR Inisiasi Forum Aspirasi Papua-Papua Barat", https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4806671/ketua-mpr-inisiasi-forum-aspirasi-papua-papua-barat, diakses 20 Desember 2020.
  33. “Oesman Sapta Odang Terpilih Jadi Ketua DPD.” https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017 /04/04/02314801/oesman. sapta.odang.terpilih.jadi.ketua.dpd, diakses 20 April 2020.
  34. “Oesman Sapta Terpilih Menjadi Ketua DPD Gantikan Mohammad Saleh.” https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3464194/oesman-sapta-terpilih-menjadi-ketua-dpd-gantikan-mohammad-saleh, diakses 20 April 2020.
  35. "Pimpinan DPD Ginandjar Kartasamita", https://dpd.go.id/pimpinan-dpd/ginandjar-kartasasmita-, diakses 29 Maret 2021.
  36. Sorik, Sutan, “Pengurus Parpol Dilarang Jadi Anggota DPD: Kepentingan Politik Praktis atau Amanah Konstitusi?” Pusat Penelitian Politik LIPI. http://www.politik.lipi.go.id/kolom/kolom-2/politik-nasional/1249-pengurus-parpoldila rang-jadi-anggota-dpd-kepentingan-politik-praktis-atau-amanah-konstitusi#ftn5, diakses 20 April 2020.
  37. "Taufiq Kiemas Pimpin MPR", https://koran.tempo.co/read/nasional/ 178000/taufiq-kiemas-pimpin-mpr, diakses 29 Maret 2021.
  38. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Putusan Pengadilan
  39. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Repulik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
  40. Penetapan Presiden Nomor 2 Tahun 1959 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Sementara, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1959 Nomor 77, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 1816.
  41. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 1959 tentang Susunan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Sementara, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1959 Nomor 150, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 1917.
  42. Penetapan Presiden Nomor 4 Tahun 1960 tentang Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Gotong Royong, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1960 Nomor 78, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 2015.
  43. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 30/PUU-XVI/2018.
  44. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012.
  45. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 65P/HUN/2018.