Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 3, 2016
Published
September 1, 2006
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 317 Download : 478

Main Article Content

Abstract

Basically, GAM has the basic right demanding the manifestation of self determination for separating to Indonesia. It is based on the unjustice and suffering of Acehnese during the New Order Regime. However, some determination should be discussed intensively in
responding the Acehnese self determination, such as it must be considered the consequences and the ability of Acehnese on keeping their community survival and interaction to international community if the separation to Indonesia is permissible.

Keywords

Aceh GAM Self Determination

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
sefriani, sefriani. (2006). Self Determination Right Bagi Aceh: HAM Versus Integritas Wilayah Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 10(24), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol10.iss24.art12
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Daftar Pustaka
  2. Cipto, Bambang, "Gerakan Separatis dan
  3. Dampaknya terhadap Pengembangan
  4. Demokrasi", dalam Jurnal UNISIA,
  5. No.47/XXVI/!/2003, Ull PfBSS, Yogyakarta.
  6. Cristeseu. Aureiiu, The Right to Self Determi
  7. nation, New York: United Nations, 1981.
  8. Dixon. Martin, Text Book onInternational Law,
  9. fourt edition, USA: Blackstone Press
  10. Limited, 2000.
  11. Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International
  12. Lawand Institution, Oxford: Clarendon
  13. Press, 1997.
  14. Huda, Ni'matuI, "Mencari Sclusi Konstitusional
  15. untuk Integrasi Nasional, dalam Juma!
  16. UNISIA, No.47/XXVI/!/2a03. Ull Press,
  17. Yogyakarta.
  18. Lung -chu Chen. An Introduction to Contem
  19. porary Intemational Law: APolicy Ori
  20. ented Perspective, New Haven and
  21. London: Yale University Press, 1989.
  22. Ott, David, Public IntematioalLaw in Modem
  23. World, London: Pitman Publishing,
  25. Pomerance, Michia, Self-Determination in
  26. Law and Practice: the new doctrine in
  27. the United Nations, Martinus Nijhoff
  28. Publishers, The Haque/Boston,
  29. London, 1982.
  30. Shaw, Malcolm N.. Intemational Law, 3"^ edi
  31. tion, Grotius Publications Limited,
  33. Suraputra, Sidik, "Hak Untuk Menentukan
  34. Nasib Sendiri Dalam Hukum
  35. Internasional Publik," dalam Jurnal
  36. Hukum dan Pembangunan , Juli 1982
  37. Sureda, A. Rego, The Evolution oftheRight to
  38. Self Determination Right a Study of
  39. United Nations practice, Leiden: A.W
  40. Sithoff, 1993.
  41. Thurer, Daniel, TherightofSelfDeterminationt
  42. of People, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  44. Visscher, Charles de, Theory and Reality in
  45. Public International Law, Princenton,
  47. Wilson, Hether, IntemationalLawand The Use
  48. of Force by National Liberation Move-'
  49. ments, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.