Article Sidebar
Submitted
June 1, 2016
Published
May 1, 2006
Download
Statistic
Read Counter :
283
Download : 1328
Main Article Content
Abstract
ATCk restricts its jurisdiction by imposing some doctrines such as minimum contact, forum non-convenience, political question, international commuty and act of state doc trine. Besides that, it also ignores the international criminal law principles such as pre
sumption of innocence, expeditious trial, equity ofarms and the atendance ofthe suspect in the court. The existence of par im parem in habet Imperium principle recognized in
international law causes the decision of American Courtis meaningless.
sumption of innocence, expeditious trial, equity ofarms and the atendance ofthe suspect in the court. The existence of par im parem in habet Imperium principle recognized in
international law causes the decision of American Courtis meaningless.
Keywords
jurisdiction
criminal
innocence
Article Details
How to Cite
sefriani, sefriani. (2006). Perierapan Yurisdiksi Alien Tort Claim Act Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 13(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol13.iss2.art4
References
- Akehurst, Michael, AModem Introduction toIn
- ternational Law, George Allen and
- Unwin (Publisher) Ltd, Fourth edition, 1982.
- Antonio Cassese, Intemational Criminal Law,
- Oxford University Press, 2003
- Alina Kaczorowska, Textbook :Public Intema
- tional Law, Old Bailey Press, London.
- Dixcn, Martin, Textbook on Intemational Law,
- fourt edition, Blackctone Press Limited,
- London, United Kingdom, 2000
References
Akehurst, Michael, AModem Introduction toIn
ternational Law, George Allen and
Unwin (Publisher) Ltd, Fourth edition, 1982.
Antonio Cassese, Intemational Criminal Law,
Oxford University Press, 2003
Alina Kaczorowska, Textbook :Public Intema
tional Law, Old Bailey Press, London.
Dixcn, Martin, Textbook on Intemational Law,
fourt edition, Blackctone Press Limited,
London, United Kingdom, 2000