Main Article Content
Abstract
After more than a decade that Constitutional Court (MK) carries out its constitutional duties, this institution that was formed on 13 August 2003 has issued thousands of decisions The main problems in this research are, first, how is the role of the Constitutional Court on social change in society? Second, as a judicial institution, what kind of change model that the Constitutional Court does; is it the Instigator of Social Change or Agent of Social Change? Third, does the society prefer the role of the Constitutional Court as Instigator of Social Change or Agent of Social Change? The research method used in this research was normative-juridical research method. The results of the research concluded that, first, as a juridicial institution, the Constitutional Court has a significant role in making social changes to society. There are at least two decisions issued by the Constitutional Court that have changed public attitude, namely Decision of the Constitutional Court No 46/ PUU-VIII/2010 on "Children outside of Marriage" and Decision of the Constitutional Court No 47-81/PHPU.A-VII/2009 on "About Noken System". Second, in making such social changes, there are at least two models used by the Constitutional Court, namely playing the roles as Instigator of Social Change and Agent of Social Change. Third, society prefers the Constitutional Court to serve as Agent of Social Change rather than as Instigator of Social Change.Â
Keywords
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
References
- Buku
- Ashshofa, Burhan, Metode Penelitian Hukum, cet. ke-4, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2004.
- Cooter, Robert D., The Strategic Constitution, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 2000.
- Jacobs, Francis G., The Sovereignty of law: the European way, Cambridge University Press, London, 2007.
- Kriekhof, Valerine J.L., dkk., “Metode Penelitian Hukum (Seri Buku Ajar),†Buku A, (Depok, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2000).
- Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media, Jakarta, 2005.
- Mahfud MD, Moh., “Inilah Hukum Progresif Indonesia†dalam Moh. Mahfud MD, dkk, Dekonstruksi dan Gerakan Pemikiran Hukum Progresif, Thafa Media dan Konsorsium Hukum Progresif Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2013.
- Rahardjo, Satjipto, Biarkan Hukum Mengalir: Catatan Kritis tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum, Penerbit Buku Kompas, Jakarta, 2007.
- Riggs, Fred W., Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic Society Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1964.
- Rosenfeld, Michel, Constitutional Adjudication in Europe and the United States: Paradoxes and Contrasts, dalam European and US Constitutionalism , Georg Nolte (ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.Rosenberg, Gerald N., The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1991.
- Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamuji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif; Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, cet. ke-6, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003.
- Strauss, David A., The Living Constitution, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
- Mahkamah Konstitusi, Refleksi 2013 dan Proyeksi 2014 Mahkamah Konstitusi Menjaga Independensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Menyongsong Pemilu 2014, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2014.
- Jurnal
- Ghoffar, Abdul, “Kejujuran dalam Bingkai Hak Memilih-Dipilih (Pelajaran dari Pemilukada Bengkulu Selatan)â€, Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 8 No. 1 Tahun 2011.
- Munawaroh, Nafiatul, dan Maryam Nur Hidayati, “Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Upaya Pembangunan Hukum Indonesiaâ€, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum No. 2 Vol. 22 April 2015.
- Sackville, Justice Ronald, Courts and Social Change, dalam Federal Law Review Volume 33. Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org), Mon Jan 20 03:33:42 2014.
- Majalah
- Ghoffar, Abdul, Konstitusi Yang Bernyawa, Majalah Konstitusi Edisi Mei tahun 2012.
- Peraturan Perundang-undangan
- Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie)., hukum.unsrat.ac.id/uu/kolonial_kuh_perdata.pdf‎., diakses pada tanggal 22 Januari 2014.
- Kompilasi Hukum Islam, hukum.unsrat.ac.id/ma/kompilasi.pd., diakses pada tanggal 22 Januari 2014. ‎
- Putusan Pengadilan
- Putusan MK Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 Tentang Pengujian UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
- Putusan MK Nomor 47-81/PHPU.A-VII/2009 Tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah.
- Internet:
- Bagus Anwar Hidayatulloh, Kontroversi Putusan MK Tentang Pemilu Noken, http://hukum.kompasiana.com/2013/11/24/kontroversi-putusan-mk-tentang-pemilu-noken--610900.html. Diakses pada 21 Januari 2014.
- Mengenal Noken Tas dari Papua, http://www.qbaya.com/2013/12/mengenal-noken-tas-dari-papua.html, Diakses pada 21 Januari 2014.
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Putusan%20MK%20tentang%20anak%20diluar%20perkawinan&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Putusan%20MK%20tentang%20anak%20diluar%20nikah&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np#channel=np&q=Tanggung+Jawab+Ayah+Biologis+Pasca+Putusan+MK&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Putusan%20MK%20tentang%20anak%20diluar%20nikah&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np#channel=np&q=Menerima+Putusan+Mk+Tentang+Anak+Diluar+Kawin&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Putusan%20MK%20tentang%20anak%20diluar%20nikah&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np#channel=np&q=Menolak+Putusan+Mk+Tentang+Anak+Diluar+Kawin&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Putusan%20MK%20tentang%20anak%20diluar%20perkawinan&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np#channel=np&q=Kontroversi+Putusan+MK+Tentang+Anak+Diluar+Kawin&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Putusan%20MK%20tentang%20anak%20diluar%20nikah&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np#channel=np&q=Kontroversi+Putusan+MK+tentang+anak+diluar+kawin&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Putusan%20MK%20tentang%20anak%20diluar%20nikah&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np#channel=np&q=putusan+MK+tentang+sistem+Noken&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Putusan%20MK%20tentang%20anak%20diluar%20nikah&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np#channel=np&q=menolak+putusan+MK+tentang+sistem+Noken&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Menerima%20putusan%20MK%20putusan%20MK%20tentang%20sistem%20Noken&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Menerima%20putusan%20MK%20putusan%20MK%20tentang%20sistem%20Noken&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np#channel=np&q=Menolak+putusan+MK+tentang+sistem+noken+di+yahukimo&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Menerima%20putusan%20MK%20putusan%20MK%20tentang%20sistem%20Noken&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np#channel=np&q=Menerima+putusan+MK+tentang+sistem+noken+di+yahukimo&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
- https://www.google.com/search?q=Menerima%20putusan%20MK%20putusan%20MK%20tentang%20sistem%20Noken&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np#channel=np&q=putusan+MK+tentang+sistem+noken+di+yahukimo+papua&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official.
References
Buku
Ashshofa, Burhan, Metode Penelitian Hukum, cet. ke-4, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2004.
Cooter, Robert D., The Strategic Constitution, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 2000.
Jacobs, Francis G., The Sovereignty of law: the European way, Cambridge University Press, London, 2007.
Kriekhof, Valerine J.L., dkk., “Metode Penelitian Hukum (Seri Buku Ajar),†Buku A, (Depok, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2000).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media, Jakarta, 2005.
Mahfud MD, Moh., “Inilah Hukum Progresif Indonesia†dalam Moh. Mahfud MD, dkk, Dekonstruksi dan Gerakan Pemikiran Hukum Progresif, Thafa Media dan Konsorsium Hukum Progresif Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2013.
Rahardjo, Satjipto, Biarkan Hukum Mengalir: Catatan Kritis tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum, Penerbit Buku Kompas, Jakarta, 2007.
Riggs, Fred W., Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic Society Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1964.
Rosenfeld, Michel, Constitutional Adjudication in Europe and the United States: Paradoxes and Contrasts, dalam European and US Constitutionalism , Georg Nolte (ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.Rosenberg, Gerald N., The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1991.
Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamuji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif; Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, cet. ke-6, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003.
Strauss, David A., The Living Constitution, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Mahkamah Konstitusi, Refleksi 2013 dan Proyeksi 2014 Mahkamah Konstitusi Menjaga Independensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Menyongsong Pemilu 2014, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2014.
Jurnal
Ghoffar, Abdul, “Kejujuran dalam Bingkai Hak Memilih-Dipilih (Pelajaran dari Pemilukada Bengkulu Selatan)â€, Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 8 No. 1 Tahun 2011.
Munawaroh, Nafiatul, dan Maryam Nur Hidayati, “Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Upaya Pembangunan Hukum Indonesiaâ€, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum No. 2 Vol. 22 April 2015.
Sackville, Justice Ronald, Courts and Social Change, dalam Federal Law Review Volume 33. Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org), Mon Jan 20 03:33:42 2014.
Majalah
Ghoffar, Abdul, Konstitusi Yang Bernyawa, Majalah Konstitusi Edisi Mei tahun 2012.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie)., hukum.unsrat.ac.id/uu/kolonial_kuh_perdata.pdf‎., diakses pada tanggal 22 Januari 2014.
Kompilasi Hukum Islam, hukum.unsrat.ac.id/ma/kompilasi.pd., diakses pada tanggal 22 Januari 2014. ‎
Putusan Pengadilan
Putusan MK Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 Tentang Pengujian UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Putusan MK Nomor 47-81/PHPU.A-VII/2009 Tentang Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah.
Internet:
Bagus Anwar Hidayatulloh, Kontroversi Putusan MK Tentang Pemilu Noken, http://hukum.kompasiana.com/2013/11/24/kontroversi-putusan-mk-tentang-pemilu-noken--610900.html. Diakses pada 21 Januari 2014.
Mengenal Noken Tas dari Papua, http://www.qbaya.com/2013/12/mengenal-noken-tas-dari-papua.html, Diakses pada 21 Januari 2014.