Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 5, 2017
Published
February 8, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1010 Download : 1602

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study brought up the problems, first, the theoretical foundation of the exchange of regional owned property (BMD) between local government and private parties. Second, the laws and regulations governing the exchange activities of BMD. Third, basic considerations in relation to the exchange of BMD. The type of the research was normative research. The results concluded that, first, theoretically, the government (local government) can do contractualization of governmentaffairs because this has become a practice (habit) in the government. The contractualisation includes exchange agreements with non-governmental parties that involve assets(land)thatare under government control (BMD). Second, juridically, the regulational basis for the exchange agreement serving as the basis for the right to transfer the assets (land) under government control (BMD) can be found in the legislation. In doing such actions, terms and conditions of legislation shall apply as the basis of the validity of the actions which includes the aspects of authority, substance and procedure. Third, another thing that determines the feasibility of government action in exchanging BMD (in the form of land) is the aspect of benefit (doelmatigheid).

Keywords

Government contract exchange regional property

Article Details

How to Cite
rauta, umbu, Kurnia, T. S., & Siswanto, A. (2017). Telaah Teoretis dan Yuridis Tukar Menukar Barang Milik Daerah dengan Swasta. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 24(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus, Hukum Perikatan dalam KUH Perdata Buku Ketiga: Yurisprudensi, Doktrin serta Penjelasan, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2015.
  3. Barzel, Yoram, A Theory of the State: Economic Rights, Legal Rights and the Scope of the State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
  4. Brouwer, J.G. & A.E. Schilder, A Survey of Dutch Administrative Law (Ars Aequi Libri, Nijmegen), 1998.
  5. Cane, Peter, Administrative Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011.
  6. Hadjon, Philipus M., Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia, Penerbit Bina Ilmu, Surabaya, 1987.
  7. Hadjon, Philipus M., et.al., Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2002.
  8. Hartkamp, Arthur S., dan Marianne M.M. Tillema, Contract Law in the Netherlands, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1995.
  9. Mathis, Klaus, Efficiency Instead of Justice: Searching for the Philosophical Foundations of the Economic Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, 2009.
  10. Simamora, Yohanes Sogar, Hukum Perjanjian: Prinsip Hukum Kontrak Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa oleh Pemerintah, LaksBang PRESSindo, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  11. Verkuil, Paul R., Outsourcing Sovereignty, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007.
  12. Jurnal
  13. Adha, Lalu Hadi, “Kontrak Build Operate Transfer sebagai Perjanjian Kebijakan Pemerintah dengan Pihak Swastaâ€, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 11, Nomor 3, 2011.
  14. Barnett, Randy E., “Consenting to Form Contractsâ€, Fordham Law Review, Volume 71, Nomor 3, 2002.
  15. Dworkin, Ronald, “Why Efficiency? A Response to Professors Calabresi and Posner, Hofstra Law Reviewâ€, Volume 8, Nomor 3, 1980.
  16. King, Cheryl Simrell, Kathryn M. Feltey dan Bridget O’Neill Susel, “The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administrationâ€, Public Administration Review, Volume 58, Nomor 4, 1998.
  17. Krajewski, Markus, dan Christopher Singer, “Should Judges be Front-Runners? The ICJ, State Immunity and the Protection of Fundamental Human Rightsâ€, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 16, 2012.
  18. Levin, Jonathan, dan Steven Tadelis, “Contracting for Government Services: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Citiesâ€, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Volume LVIII, Nomor 3, 2010.
  19. Michaels, Jon D., “Privatization’s Pretensionsâ€, The University of Chicago Law Review, Volume 77, Nomor 2, 2010.
  20. Nash, Jr., Ralph C., “The Government Contract Decisions of the Federal Circuitâ€, The George Washington University Law Review, Volume 78, Nomor 3, 2010.
  21. Sahlan, Mohammad, Unsur Menyalahgunakan Kewenangan dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagai Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Administrasi, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Volume 23, Nomor 2, 2016.
  22. Santoso, Urip, Perjanjian Bangun Guna Serah antara Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota dan Perseroan Terbatas, Mimbar Hukum, Volume 24, Nomor 1, 2014.
  23. Verkuil, Paul R., Is Efficient Government an Oxymoron?, Duke Law Journal, Volume 43, Nomor 6, 1994.
  24. Peraturan Perundang-undangan:
  25. UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 244; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5587), sebagaimana telah diubah, terakhir dengan Undang Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2015 (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2015 Nomor 58; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5679).
  26. PP No. 27 Tahun 2014 tentang Pengelolaan Barang Milik Negara/Daerah (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 92; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5533).
  27. Permendagri No. 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah (Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 547).