Article Sidebar

Strengthening Islamic Education Leadership An Analysis of School-Based Management Training Follow-up Programs
Submitted
May 24, 2024
Accepted
August 21, 2024
Published
August 28, 2024
Download
PDF Review Reports Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 158 Download : 108

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explains the approaches used by the Institute for Research and Community Development Studies in School-Based Management (SBM) training for Islamic elementary schools in Magelang Regency. The data in this qualitative study were collected through observation techniques, interviews, and document studies obtained from training facilitators, principals, supervisors, school boards, and training organizing committees. Furthermore, the data were analyzed using qualitative techniques. The results of the study show that the leadership enculturation approach was used in training to strengthen the leadership of Islamic elementary schools. The leadership enculturation approach was adjusted to the stages of SBM training as follows: 1) Partnership leadership enculturation was used to strengthen school leadership in preparing follow-up plans after SBM training. 2) Mentoring collaborative leadership enculturation was used to strengthen school leadership in schools’ action implementation. 3) Evaluative leadership enculturation was used to strengthen school leadership in measuring and assessing the training process, training outcomes, and the impact of change on schools. The school leadership enculturation approach adjusted to the training stages can be used to ensure the implementation of SBM in schools after training.

Keywords

Islamic Education Leadership Strengthening School-Based Management Training Follow-up Programs

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Fahrurrozi, F. (2024). Strengthening Islamic Education Leadership: An Analysis of School-Based Management Training Follow-up Programs. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 23(2), 645–680. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol23.iss2.art5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ahmad, I. (2013). Effect of community participation in education on quality of education: Evidence from a developing context. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 4(10), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v4i10.133

  2. Alajmi, M. (2022). School principals’ experiences of autonomy and accountability: Outcomes of the school education quality improvement project in Kuwait. International Journal of Educational Management,36(4), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2021-0366

  3. Aman, A. (2016). Factors hindering school community participation in co-curricular activities in secondary schools of Arsi Zone, Oromia Region [Doctoral thesis, Haramaya University]. http://ir.haramaya.edu.et/hru/handle/123456789/2603

  4. Azizah, N., Diniarti, G., Umar, V., & Suharmini, T. (2024). The role of parents in implementing the post-school transition. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(1), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i1.961.

  5. Bordoloi, M., & Kapoor, V. (2018). India: Using open school data to improve transparency and accountability. Ethics and corruption in education. International Institute for Educational Planning. https://www.iiep.unesco.org/en/india-using-open-school-data-improve-transparency-and-accountability

  6. Brown, D. S., & Ph, D. (2004). Managing from the inside out: Debating site-based management in public schools. Public Administration and Management, 9(2), 128–136. https://spaef.org/article/193/Managing-from-the-Inside-Out-Debating-Site-based-Management-in-Public-Schools

  7. Buanaputra, V. G., Astuti, D., & Sugiri, S. (2022). Accountability and legitimacy dynamics in an Islamic boarding school. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 18(4), 553-570. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2021-0016

  8. By, R. T. (2021). Leadership: In pursuit of purpose. Journal of Change Management, 21(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1861698

  9. Cheng, Y. C. (2012). The theory and characteristics of school-based management. International Journal of Educational Management, 7(6), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513549310046659

  10. Clutterbuck, D. (2005). Establishing and maintaining mentoring relationships: An overview of mentor and mentee competencies. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v3i3.70

  11. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (Second Edition). SAGE Publications.

  12. David, M. K., & Ali, A. (2022). Every challenge is an opportunity: Teaching reading in the post-pandemic period. Unisia, 40(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol40.iss1.art2

  13. Dempster, N. (2000). Guilty or not : The impact and effects of site-based management on schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010310975

  14. De Grauwe, A. (2005). School-based management (SBM ): Does it improve quality? UNESCO. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.547.1470&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  15. Dinie, D. (2017). Factors that affect community participation in the implementation of school improvement program in primary schools of Damot Woide District, Wolaita Zone. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(10), 1589–1599. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/5675

  16. Ehren, M., & Perryman, J. (2018). Accountability of school networks: Who is accountable to whom and for what? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 46(6), 942-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217717272

  17. Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004

  18. Gaspar, M. R., Gabriel, J. P., Manuel, M. B., Ladrillo, D. S., Gabriel, E. R., & Gabriel, A. G. (2022). Transparency and accountability of managing school financial resources. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 12(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v12i2.20146

  19. Godfrey, S. M. (2016). Challenges impacting community participation and their effect on teaching and learning: A case study of rural areas. European Scientific Journal, 12(25), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n25p345

  20. Goldsmith, M. (2020). The “Follow-up Factor” in management development. Archives of Psychiatry and Mental Health, 4, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.apmh.1001022

  21. Grinshtain, Y., & Gibton, D. (2018). Responsibility, authority, and accountability in school-based and non-school-based management: Principals’ coping strategies. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(1), 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2017-0005

  22. Hambali, H., Siregar, M., Sulaiman, S., Asiah, N., Makmur, T., Ashlan, S., & Muchsin, M. (2024). Effects and influential factors on the performance of state elementary school principals in North Sumatra. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(1), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i1.792

  23. Hardjono, W. (2020). Analisis efektivitas rencana tindak lanjut peserta pelatihan pertanian. Jurnal AgriWidya (Menginspirasi Untuk Pelatihan Yang Lebih Baik), 1(1), 119-127. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/items/00eb35cc-b936-4331-8c06-80ba44b2ee05

  24. Harrison, J. (2019). Building advocacy capacity in a teacher training program. In H. A. Linville & J. Whiting (Eds.), Advocacy in English language teaching and learning (pp. 44-56). Routledge.

  25. Hervas, G., & Medina, J. L. (2020). Key components of lesson study from the perspective of complexity: A theoretical analysis. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 26(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1745174

  26. Hidayat, F., & Tolla, I. (2022). Transparansi dan akuntabilitas penggunaan dana bantuan operasional sekolah (BOS) [Transparency and accountability in the use of school operational assistance funds]. Jurnal Administrasi, Kebijakan, dan Kepemimpinan Pendidikan (JAK2P), 3(1), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.26858/jak2p.v3i1.16167

  27. IRCOS Indonesia. (2022). Laporan kegiatan implementasi aksi menuju sekolah penggerak program POP - IRCOS Indonesia 2022 [Activity report on the implementation of action towards the POP program driving school - IRCOS Indonesia 2022]. IRCOS Indonesia.

  28. Jansen, S., Knippels, M. C. P. J., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2021). Lesson study as a research approach: A case study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 10(3), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-12-2020-0098

  29. Kelly, D., & Nicholson, A. (2022). Ancestral leadership: Place-based intergenerational leadership. Leadership , 18(1), 140-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211024038

  30. Kentab, M. Y. (2016). Barriers to accountability implementation in the education directorates in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(4), 129–152. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1092348.pdf

  31. King, E. F. (2018). Developing teacher capacity in Cambodia: an expanded model. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2017-0053

  32. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x

  33. Kusumaputri, E. S., Muslimah, H. L., & Hayati, E. I. (2023). The case study of Islamic-education leadership model: What we can learn from the dynamics of principals’ leadership in Indonesian excellence Islamic boarding-schools. Jurnal Psikologi, 50(1), 18-44. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.78892

  34. Lee, E., Neumann, M., Boese, S., & Maaz, K. (2021). Implementation processes of site-based management at schools in challenging circumstances in Germany: Principals’ and teachers’ perceptions of openness and consensus in target setting processes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101003

  35. Leithwood, K., & Menzies, T. (1998). Forms and effects of school-based management: A Review. Educational Policy, 12(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904898012003006

  36. Martin, H. J. (2009). Improving training impact through effective follow-up: Techniques and their application. Journal of Management Development, 29(6), 520-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711011046495

  37. Mehner, L., Rothenbusch, S., & Kauffeld, S. (2024). How to maximize the impact of workplace training: A mixed-method analysis of social support, training transfer and knowledge sharing. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2024.2319082

  38. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd edition). Sage Publications, Inc.

  39. Mohammed, I., Abdulal, R., & Seidu, A. A. (2022). Contraints and restrictions to community participation in school developments at primary schools in the Sagnarigu Municipal, Ghana. Journal of Educational Review, 14(1), 41–51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363896448

  40. Moradi, S., Bin, S., & Barzegar, N. (2012). School-based management (SBM), opportunity or threat (Education systems of Iran ). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 2143–2150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.179

  41. Morales-Huamán, H. I., Medina-Valderrama, C. J., Valencia-Arias, A., Vasquez-Coronado, M. H., Valencia, J., & Delgado-Caramutti, J. (2023). Organizational culture and teamwork: A bibliometric perspective on public and private organizations. Sustainability, 15(18), 13966. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813966

  42. Mulyana, S.. (2007). Lesson study. LPMP Jawa Barat.

  43. Murrell, A. (2022). Peer mentoring and the importance of identity work: A case study on increasing study abroad participation among African American students. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 34(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v34i2.786

  44. Mustiningsih. (2015). Masalah implementasi manajemen berbasis sekolah di sekolah dasar [Problems of implementing school-based management in elementary schools]. Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(6), 498–505. http://ap.fip.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/04-mustiningsih.pdf

  45. Nadeem, M., Khan, A. N., & Gul, M. (2020). Community participation in improving quality of education at secondary school level. Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research (SJESR), 3(2), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol3-iss2-2020(115-120) 3(2), 115–120.

  46. O’Day, J. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 293–329. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.3.021q742t8182h238

  47. Parsloe, E. & Wray, M. J. (2000). Coaching and mentoring: Practical methods to improve learning. Kogan Page Publishers.

  48. Prior, L., Jerrim, J., Thomson, D., & Leckie, G. (2021). A review and evaluation of secondary school accountability in England: Statistical strengths, weaknesses and challenges for ‘Progress 8’ raised by Covid-19. Review of Education, 9(3), e3299. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3299

  49. Purwanto, N. A. ., Yuliana, L. ., Surya, P. ., Suharyadi, A. ., Mat Nashir, I. ., Abullah Kamal, S. S. L. ., & Darmadji, A. . (2024). Government Direction on the Vocational School’s Performance Evaluation in Indonesia and Malaysia: Some Notes from Islamic Education’s Perspective. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 23(1), 331–374. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol23.iss1.art11

  50. Santosh G. (2023, March 2). Partnership leadership: Opportunities and challenges in a global context [Post]. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/partnership-leadership-opportunities-challenges-global-g-/

  51. Stead, V. (2005). Mentoring: A model for leadership development? International Journal of Training and Development, 9(3), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2005.00232.x

  52. Susisanti, S. (2022). Hubungan transparansi dan akuntabilitas dengan partisipasi komunitas SMA Negeri 26 Bone [The relationship between transparency and accountability with community participation at SMA Negeri 26 Bone]. Manajemen Pendidikan, 17(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.23917/jmp.v17i1.15407

  53. Thein, K., Takahashi, Y., & Soe, A. (2023). The impact of action planning after causation-and-effectuation-based entrepreneurship education. Behavioral Sciences, 13(7), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070569

  54. Thohri, M. (2022). Islamic school leadership model: The challenge in digital era. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1939

  55. Tim IRCOS. (2021a). Modul pelatihan manajemen berbasis sekolah IRCOS Indonesia [IRCOS Indonesia school-based management training module]. IRCOS Indonesia.

  56. Tim IRCOS. (2021b). Materi PPT. rencana tindak lanjut workshop “Perencanaan aksi menuju sekolah penggerak” tanggal 7-9 Juni 2022 [Power Point material for the follow-up plan for the workshop "Action planning towards a driving school" on June 7-9, 2022]. IRCOS Indonesia.

  57. Tim Tanoto Foundation. (2018). Modul I Praktik yang baik dalam manajemen berbasis sekolah [Module I Good practices in school-based management]. Tanoto Foundation.

  58. Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. N. (1993). Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543590

  59. Topno, H. (2012). Evaluation of training and development: An analysis of various models. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.9790/487x-0521622

  60. Trube, M. B., Prince, B. L., & Middleton, R. A. (2012). Collaborative partnerships for capacity building through professional development. Advances in Educational Administration, 16(January 2012), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3660(2012)0000016008

  61. USAID Prioritas. (2014). Modul II: Praktik yang baik MBS di SD/MI dan SMP/MTs: Bahan rujukan bagi LPTK [Module II: Good practices of school-based management in elementary schools/Islamic elementary schools and junior high schools/Islamic junior high schools: Reference materials for Teacher Training Institutions]. USAID Prioritas. https://ierc-publicfiles.s3.amazonaws.com/public/resources/BAHAN_RUJUKAN_LPTK_MBS.pdf

  62. Valli, L., Stefanski, A., & Jacobson, R. (2018). School-community partnership models: Implications for leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1124925

  63. van den Boom-Muilenburg, S. N., de Vries, S., van Veen, K., Poortman, C., & Schildkamp, K. (2022). Leadership practices and sustained lesson study. Educational Research, 64(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2090982

  64. Wilson, R., Joiner, K., & Abbasi, A. (2021). Improving students’ performance with time management skills. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(4), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.4.16

  65. Zhang, S., & Usaho, K. (2019). Factors affecting school administration effectiveness in public upper secondary schools of Heze City , Shandong Province , the People’s Republic of China. EAU Heritage Journal Social Science and Humanities (Online), 9(3), 108-121. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EAUHJSocSci/article/view/229844

The Role of Islamic Education Teachers in Addressing the Negative Impact of the TikTok on Teenagers in Lampung, Indonesia

Rumadani Sagala, Iin Kandedes
Abstract View : 166
Download :64
10.20885/millah.vol23.iss2.art14
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Government Direction on the Vocational School’s Performance Evaluation in Indonesia and Malaysia: Some Notes from Islamic Education’s Perspective

Nurtanio Agus Purwanto, Lia Yuliana, Priadi Surya, Aris Suharyadi, Irdayanti Mat Nashir,...
Abstract View : 349
Download :150
10.20885/millah.vol23.iss1.art11
PDF

The Absorption of Islamic Education Thought of KH. M. Hasyim Asy’ari through Teaching of Adab al-‘Alim wa al-Muta’allim among the Santri at the Pesantren Tebuireng

Muhammad Abror Rosyidin, Jasminto Jasminto, Jumari Jumari
Abstract View : 562
Download :292
10.20885/millah.vol22.iss2.art12
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Curriculum Innovation for the Internationalization of Islamic Education Study Program at Higher Education Institutions in Surabaya, Indonesia

Abd. Rachman Assegaf, Husniyatus Salamah Zainiyah , Muhammad Fahmi
Abstract View : 503
Download :305
10.20885/millah.vol21.iss3.art3
PDF Review Reports

Learning Taxonomy of Islamic Education: The Development of Aql and the Brain in Quran from a Neuroscience Perspective

Suyadi
Abstract View : 730
Download :482
10.20885/millah.vol21.iss2.art3
PDF Review Reports