Article Sidebar

Anthropo-Centrism to Cosmo-Centrism Extending Wisdom of the Bhagavad Gita to Strengthen Sustainability’s Core
Submitted
July 17, 2025
Accepted
February 23, 2026
Published
February 24, 2026
Download
PDF Review Reports Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 239 Download : 24

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper seeks to extend the wisdom of Bhagavad Gita to overcome the philosophical limitations of the sustainability conceptualization. The modern concept of sustainability has often been criticized for being anthropocentric and non-inclusive. Its ignorance of existing philosophical traditions further poses limitations on wider scale adoption of the concept. The concept needs to evolve beyond its current anthropocentric view, rooted in Cartesian dualism and Kantian categorical imperatives, to embrace eastern cultural perspectives rooted in non-dualism of the Vedic traditions. The traditional wisdom across cultures will strengthen its philosophical foundations and make it inclusive. The Bhagavad Gita can potentially contribute to enhance the current conceptualization of sustainability at both philosophical and operational level. Using the Gadamerian (philosophical) hermeneutics as a method, the paper demonstrates, how the wisdom in the verses of the Bhagavad Gita's can address sustainability's limitations the paper demonstrates how the wisdom in the verses of the Bhagavad Gita can address sustainability's limitations. It demonstrates, how the wisdom can help overcome the myopic, anthropocentric view of sustainability and make it more inclusive, cross-culturally relevant, and pragmatic. By integrating the diverging Western and Eastern philosophical approaches, we demonstrate how the core of sustainability can be strengthened.

Keywords

Bhagavad Gita Cosmo-Centrism Environmental Ethics Philosophical Foundations Sustainability Sustainable Development Vedic Philosophy

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Pravin Dange, Pradnya Chitrao, Kumendra Raheja

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Dange, P., Chitrao , P. ., & Raheja , K. . (2026). Anthropo-Centrism to Cosmo-Centrism: Extending Wisdom of the Bhagavad Gita to Strengthen Sustainability’s Core . Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 25(1), 495–542. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol25.iss1.art13
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Adelman, S. (2018). The sustainable development goals, anthropocentrism and neoliberalism. In D. French & L. J. Kotzé (Eds.), Sustainable Development Goals. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438768.00008

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438768.00008

  2. Bakari, M. E.-K. (2014). Sustainability’s inner conflicts: From ‘ecologism’ to ‘ecological modernization.’ Journal of Sustainable Development Studies, 6(1). https://www.scienta.asia/index.php/jsds/article/view/618

  3. Bansal, P., & Song, H.-C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095

  4. Bateman, I. J., & Turner, R. K. (1993). Valuation of the environment, methods and techniques: The contingent valuation method. Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management: Principles and Practice, 120–191.

  5. Bhadeshiya, H. B., Shukla, P., & Muniapan, B. (2023). The relevance of Satvik management model from the Bhagavad Gita for business sustainability. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 28(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2023.129009

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2023.129009

  6. Borah, S. K. (2012). Ancient indian wisdom and sustainable development. Quest-The Journal of UGC-ASC Nainital, 6(3), 537. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0974-5041.6.3.046

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0974-5041.6.3.046

  7. Boscardin, L., & Bossert, L. (2015). Sustainable development and nonhuman animals: Why anthropocentric concepts of sustainability are outdated and need to be extended. In S. Meisch, J. Lundershausen, L. Bossert, & M. Rockoff (Eds.), Ethics of Science in the Research for Sustainable Development (pp. 323–352). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845258430-323

  8. Capurso, I., Tolusso, E., Marini, A., & Bonardi, L. (2020). L’insostenibile leggerezza della sostenibilità: I limiti dell’attuale ecopolitica. Geography Notebooks, 3(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.7358/gn-2020-002-capu

  9. Chapple, C. K. (2003). Hinduism and deep ecology. In This Sacred Earth (pp. 300–315). Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203426982-45&type=chapterpdf

  10. Chatterjee, D. (2022). Dharma of leadership: Wisdom of the Bhagavad Gita in an uncertain world. In S. Mukherjee & L. Zsolnai (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Indian Spirituality and Management (pp. 219–226). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1158-3_18

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1158-3_18

  11. Das, B. (2018). Ātma-Vidyā or the science of the self. In Revival: Contemporary Indian Philosophy (1936) (pp. 137–171). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315122960-7/%C4%81tma-vidy%C4%81-science-self-bhagavan-das

  12. Dellios, R. (2022). Sustainable development from an East-West integrative perspective: Eastern culture meets Western complexity theory. In P. S. Low (Ed.), Sustainable Development: Asia-Pacific Perspectives (1st ed., pp. 36–41). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511977961.010

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511977961.010

  13. Dhamija, A., Dhamija, S., Pandoi, D., & Singh, K. (2023). The management mantra of the Bhagavad Gita: Key to organizational excellence. Psychological Studies, 68(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-022-00695-2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-022-00695-2

  14. Dhiman, S. (2019). Doing the right thing: The ethical philosophy of the Bhagavad Gītā. In S. Dhiman & A. D. Amar (Eds.), Managing by the Bhagavad Gītā (pp. 47–67). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99611-0_3

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99611-0_3

  15. Eslami, Y., Dassisti, M., Lezoche, M., & Panetto, H. (2019). A survey on sustainability in manufacturing organisations: Dimensions and future insights. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15–16), 5194–5214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1544723

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1544723

  16. Ferreira, F., & Cruz Bomfim, Z. Á. (2010). Sustentabilidade ambiental: Visâo antropocêntrica ou biocêntrica? http://hdl.handle.net/2183/8335

  17. Ghimire, J. (2018). Metaphysics in the Bhagavad Gita compared with the western philosophies: A hermeneutic gaze. Researcher: A Research Journal of Culture and Society, 3(3), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.3126/researcher.v3i3.21548

  18. Goel, K. K., Sapra, R., & Sharma, R. R. (2025). The Bhagavad-Gītā and ESG/CSR implementation: A philosophical and functional model for firm financial success. Journal of Human Values, 09716858251364980. https://doi.org/10.1177/09716858251364980

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09716858251364980

  19. Grim, J., & Tucker, M. E. (2014). Ecology and religion. Princeton University Press.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.41003348

  20. Hee, C. C. H. (2007). A holistic approach to business management: Perspectives from the Bhagavad Gita. Singapore Management Review, 29(1), 73–85. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA157032910&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=01295977&p=AONE&sw=w

  21. Herington, M., Malakar, Y., & Sharma, V. (2020). A Hindu philosophy perspective on the temporal nature of energy justice in Odisha, India. In G. Bombaerts, K. Jenkins, Y. A. Sanusi, & W. Guoyu (Eds.), Energy justice across borders (pp. 177–194). Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-24021-9_9

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24021-9_9

  22. Hessami, A. G., Hsu, F., & Jahankhani, H. (2015). A systems framework for sustainability. In M. Zhou, H. Li, & M. Weijnen (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Systems Science and Engineering (1st ed., pp. 3–19). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119036821.ch1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119036821.ch1

  23. Hickel, J. (2019). The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 873–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1947

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1947

  24. Hosen, S. (2021). Concept paper on sustainability. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3878981

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3878981

  25. Jarwar, M. A., Dumontet, S., & Pasquale, V. (2024). The natural world in Western thought. Challenges, 15(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe15010017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/challe15010017

  26. Khalid, F. M. (2002). Islam and the Environment. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, 5(1), 332–339. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fazlun-Khalid/publication/238077285_Islam_and_the_Environment/links/561d2f5808aef097132b1c90/Islam-and-the-Environment.pdf

  27. Klarin, T. (2018). The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 21(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2018-0005

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2018-0005

  28. Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & J Piccolo, J. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than just a misunderstood problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1

  29. Krishnananda, S. (2000). The philosophy of the Bhagavadgita. The Divine Life Society. https://www.spiritual-minds.com/Gita_files/Bhagavad%20Gita/gita-phiilosophy.pdf

  30. Kumar, S., & Giri, T. K. (2020). Interconnectedness between spirituality and sustainable development goals: Evidence from an Indian perspective. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 20(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2020.105553

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2020.105553

  31. Lavanya, L. (2021). Henry fayol’s principles of management and Bhagavad Gita – A hermeneutics study. PARIPEX INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 124–126. https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/0211337

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/0211337

  32. Low, P. K. C., & Muniapan, B. (2011). The essential leadership wisdom of the Bhagavad Gita. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 2(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4018/jabim.2011100101

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jabim.2011100101

  33. Malakar, Y., Herington, M. J., & Sharma, V. (2019). The temporalities of energy justice: Examining India’s energy policy paradox using non-western philosophy. Energy Research & Social Science, 49, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.002

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.002

  34. Mallick, K. (2025). Environmental movements of India: Chipko, narmada bachao andolan, navdanya (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462984431

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462984431

  35. Mazzocchi, F. (2020). A deeper meaning of sustainability: Insights from indigenous knowledge. The Anthropocene Review, 7(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619898888

  36. McIntyre, M. L., Caputo, T., & Murphy, S. A. (2017). The inescapably ethical foundation of sustainability. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 12(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2017.086471

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2017.086471

  37. Mollica, D. (2009). Robert Goodland (1995), “The Concept of Environmental Sustainability”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, pp. 1–24. In Sustainability. Routledge.

  38. Muniapan, B., & Dass, M. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: A philosophical approach from an ancient Indian perspective. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 1(4), 408. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2008.018622

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2008.018622

  39. Muniapan, B., & Satpathy, B. (2013). The ‘Dharma’ and ‘Karma’ of CSR from the Bhagavad-Gita. Journal of Human Values, 19(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685813492265

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685813492265

  40. Nafde, Dr. Mrs. T. (2021). Creation of knowledge, innovation & invention for building nation. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 9(VI), 4938–4941. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.36019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.36019

  41. Naudé, P. (2018). Can we overcome the anthropocentrism bias in sustainability discourse? African Journal of Business Ethics, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.15249/11-2-189

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15249/11-2-189

  42. Nelson, L. E. (1998). Purifying the earthly body of God: Religion and ecology in Hindu India. State University of New York Press.

  43. Neumayer, E. (2010). Weak versus Strong Sustainability. https://www.elgaronline.com/monobook/9781848448728.xml

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805438.00013

  44. O’Connor, M. (2006). The “Four Spheres” framework for sustainability. Ecological Complexity, Complexity and Ecological Economics, 3(4), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.002

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.002

  45. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133

  46. Pandey, Y. R. (2018). Economic interpretation of philosophy of Bhagavad Gita: A descriptive analysis. Economic Journal of Development Issues, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.3126/ejdi.v23i1-2.19066

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ejdi.v23i1-2.19066

  47. Pillai, R. R., & G, A. K. (2018). Balancing spiritual qualities leads to sustainability. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 16361. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.16361abstract

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.16361abstract

  48. Poddar, A. K. (2023). Karma yoga and social activism: The Bhagavad Gita’s teachings on selfless action as a catalyst for change in society. The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society, 14(4), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v14i04/35-52

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v14i04/35-52

  49. Pokhrel, K. P. (2023). Geographical reflections in the Bhagavad Gita: Lessons for the 21st century. The Third Pole: Journal of Geography Education, 23(01), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3126/ttp.v23i01.61903

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ttp.v23i01.61903

  50. Prabhupada, A. C. B. S. (1989). Bhagavad-Gita as it is (2nd ed.). The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust.

  51. Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5

  52. Quinn, F., Littledyke, M., & Taylor, N. (2015). Issues and dimensions of sustainability. In N. Taylor, F. Quinn, & C. Eames (Eds.), Educating for Sustainability in Primary Schools (pp. 15–31). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-046-8_2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-046-8_2

  53. Ranjan, A., & Dahiya, Y. (2024). A conceptual review of eating practices derived from the Srimad Bhagwad Gita. Global Journal for Research Analysis, 13(1), 172–174. https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/1308626

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/1308626

  54. Rao, G. S. P. & Sujatha G. (2015). Principles in the Bhagavad Gita contribute to spiritual foundation of sustainability. In S. Mukherjee & C. Stückelberger (Eds.), Sustainability ethics: Ecology, economy & ethics: International Conference SusCon III, Shillong/India (pp. 67–90). Globethics.net Global 10. https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/bitstream/CLACSO/8047/1/SutainabilitEthics2015.pdf#page=68

  55. Sanford, A. W. (2013). Gandhi’s agrarian legacy: Practicing food, justice, and sustainability in India. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 7(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v7i1.65

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v7i1.65

  56. Santillo, D. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research - International, 14(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.01.375

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.01.375

  57. Satpathy, B., & Muniapan, B. (2009). The knowledge of “self” from the Bhagavad-Gita and its significance for human capital development. Asian Social Science, 4(10), p143. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v4n10p143

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v4n10p143

  58. Savelyeva, T. (2017). Vernadsky meets Yulgok: A non-Western dialog on sustainability. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(5), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1138851

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1138851

  59. Scoones, I. (2016). The politics of sustainability and development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039

  60. Seghezzo, L. (2009). The five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903063669

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903063669

  61. Şen, H., Kaya, A., & Alpaslan, B. (2018). A historical and current perspective on sustainability. Ekonomik Yaklasim, 29(107), 1. https://doi.org/10.5455/ey.39101

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/ey.39101

  62. Shreshtha Yadav, Neena Kohli, & Anupam Kumar Yadav. (2017). Organizational effectiveness through the lessons of Bhagwat Gita. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.25215/0404.108

  63. Silva, A. S., De Souza, J. G., & Leal, A. C. (2012). A sustentabilidade e suas dimensões como fundamento da qualidade de vida. Geografia Em Atos (Online), 1(12). https://doi.org/10.35416/geoatos.v1i12.1724

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35416/geoatos.v1i12.1724

  64. Starlet, C. (2024). Environmental ethics and the philosophy of sustainability. International Journal of Philosophy, 3(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2093

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2093

  65. United Nations. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017 (ST/DESA(05)/S96/2017). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2017/TheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsReport2017.pdf

  66. Vizeu, F., Meneghetti, F. K., & Seifert, R. E. (2012). Por uma crítica ao conceito de desenvolvimento sustentável. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 10(3), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512012000300007

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512012000300007

  67. Washington, H., Taylor, B., Kopnina, H., Cryer, P., & Piccolo, J. J. (2017). Why ecocentrism is the key pathway to sustainability. The Ecological Citizen, 1(1), 35–41. https://www.ecologicalcitizen.net/pdfs/v01n1-08.pdf

  68. Wolf, C. (2018). Sustainability and the currency of intergenerational obligations: Norton, solow, rawls, mill, and sen on problems of intergenerational allocation. In S. Sarkar & B. A. Minteer (Eds.), A Sustainable Philosophy—The Work of Bryan Norton (Vol. 26, pp. 49–70). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92597-4_4

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92597-4_4

  69. Zeman, V. (1996). Philosophy for sustainable society?? Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory, 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1109/KTSC.1995.569173

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/KTSC.1995.569173

Managing the Self: Lessons from the Bhagavad Gita on Personal Management and Development

Kavya P. Hegde, Venkatesha Nayak
Abstract View : 761
Download :1363
10.20885/millah.vol24.iss1.art9
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Waqf Sustainability or Sustainable Waqf? A Bibliometric Analysis

Vika Annisa Qurrata, Muhammad Hakimi Mohd. Shafiai , Suhaili Alma’amun , Hairunnizam Wahid,...
Abstract View : 2315
Download :1614
10.20885/millah.vol23.iss1.art4
PDF

Towards Sustainable Development of Islamic Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities

Desmaniar, Rusli, Aqil Teguh Fathani, Novia Amirah Azmi, Muhammad Mughni, Imam Rasikh Islami,...
Abstract View : 1309
Download :806
10.20885/millah.vol21.iss3.art5
PDF Review Reports