Main Article Content

Abstract

The Presidential Threshold setting provides a separate previllage for parliamentary Political Parties to nominate a Pair of. Meanwhile, political parties that have just become participants in the general election contestation cannot nominate their presidential and vice-presidential candidates in that election. Meanwhile, the Constitutional Court has consistently stated that the Presidential Threshold is an open legal policy 27 times. This makes the function of political recruitment by new political parties impossible. Kebangkitan Nasional Party (PKN) proposed testing the Presidential Threshold at MK which in the petite of this propose request that the Constitutional Court decide on the application of the presidential threshold to exclude new political parties from participating in the election. So what are the problems with applying the presidential threshold in Indonesian elections? as well as, what is the relevance of implementing the presidential threshold exception for new political parties participating in the election? This paper was prepared based on legal research with a juridical-normative approach using primary legal sources as the main research material. The results of this study conclude first, setting the presidential threshold creates anomalies and discrimination against political parties that have just become election participants. Second, the relevance of the presidential threshold exception is as an antithesis to the symptoms of cartelization that occurred in old political parties Presidential Candidates and Vice Presidential Candidates.

Keywords

Presidential Threshold Political Party Election

Article Details

References

  1. Rully Chairul Azwar, “Partai Politik Di Tengah Ancaman Virus Oligarki dan Partai Kartel”, Jurnal Ketatanegaraan Vol. 5 November 2017, 15.
  2. Alfa Fitri & Wicipto Setiadi, “Presidential Threshold dalam Pemilihan Umum Serentak: Kemunduran Demokrasi Konstitusional?”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol 19 Maret 2022, 69.
  3. Kadek Dwita Apriani, “Efek Ekor Jas dan Identifikasi Partai Politik dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019 di Bali”, Jurnal Bappeda Litbang Bali, Vol. 2 No. 1 April 2019, 12.
  4. Bachtiar, dkk., “Menguatnya Partai Politik Kartel pada Pemilu Serentak 2019”, Jurnal Pengawasan Pemilu, Agustus 2022, 84-85.
  5. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/02/27/07195651/berkali-kali-diuji-presidential-threshold-selalu-kandas-di-mk, diakses pada 17 April 2023, Pukul 10:00 WIB.
  6. Keputusan KPU Nomor 987/PL.01.8-KPT/06/KPU/V/2019 tentang Penetapan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Provinsi, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Kabupaten/Kota
  7. Pasal 414 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum Jo. Perppu No. 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
  8. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/08/02/7-partai-ini-tidak-memenuhi-syarat-parliamentary-threshold-pada-pemilu-2019 diakses pada 16 April Pukul 20:00 WIB.
  9. Ramlan Surbakti, “Pemilu yang Adil dan Berintegritas, Kompas 14 Februari 2014”. https://lautanopini.wordpress.com/2014/02/14/pemilu-berintegritas-dan-adil/, diakses pada 17 April 2023 Pukul 15:00 WIB.
  10. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/07/13/berapa-banyak-warga-yang-percaya-partai-politik-ini-hasil-surveinya, diakses pada 17 April 2023 Pukul 14:00 WIB.
  11. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bI2OYVhnNPs, diakses pada 15 April 2023 Pukul 20:00 WIB.