Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 48 Download : 60

Main Article Content

Abstract

The absence of limitations on the Constitutional Court to adjudicate court decisions regarding electoral regulations ahead of electoral contests has become a serious issue in Indonesia. Without clear limitations, court decisions have the potential to disrupt the electoral administration process and create uncertainty that could harm the electoral order. Reflecting on Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which regulates the age requirements for presidential and vice-presidential candidates before elections, serves as a stern reminder that the courts should not grant judicial review related to elections as it may give rise to conflicts of interest and tend to favor one party. To address this issue, the application of the Purcell Principle in Indonesia is necessary. The research method used is normative legal research using a legal approach and utilizing secondary data in the form of literature materials, such as legislation, court decisions, books, scholarly articles, and internet sources regarding the Purcell Principle. This study concludes that the application of the Purcell Principle is needed in Indonesia. Considering the concept of the Purcell Principle already applied in the United States, Indonesia must adopt the Purcell Principle to ensure order and legal certainty in the conduct of elections in the country.

Keywords

Purcell Principle General Elections Constitutional Court Judicial Review

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Ibrahim Ghifar Hamadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2014.
  2. Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2015.
  3. Anang, Moh Sitoh, dan Titi Anggraeni. “Penataan Kerangka Hukum Pemilu yang Demokratis Efektif dan Efisien” Jurnal Pengawasan Pemilu (2021). library.jakarta.bawaslu.go.id.
  4. Codrington III, Wilfred U. “Purcell in Pandemic," NYUL Rev. 96 (2021), https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/nylr96&section=25&casa_token=yHUf_AJopysAAAAA:UvWC7kMgmjHdJqGC03Vi8N5sXMwTPODdT6vmMu-D94de9k2Hx-C-Y7ddJttuRQIwI82CEC5QMw.
  5. Dodsworth, Harry B. "The Positive and Negative Purcell Principle”, Utah Law Principle, no. 5, (2022), https://doi.org/10.26054/0d-9nqp-9t93.
  6. Gao, Ruoyin. "Why the Purcell Principle Should Be Abolished," Duke Law Journal 71 (2021), https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol71/iss5/4.
  7. Gilleran, Samuel D. "Purcell v. Gonzalez, Principle and Problem-Native American Voting Rights in the 2018 North Dakota Elections," Wake Forest L. Rev. 55 (2020),https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/wflr55&section=17&casa_token=rZpeAW5RNFUAAAAA:cgXEg8vJS779nZOs2ut_AxuLY6KoNaUNwzDqK_f8eT-DoGA_XhJh-1fL0NVwMt_vQPwzcWlRnw.
  8. Houston, Rachel. "Does Anybody Really Know What Time It is?: How the US Supreme Court Defines “Time” Using The Purcell Principle,” Nevada Law Journal, no. 3, (2023), https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nlj/vol23/iss3/5.
  9. Huda, Ni’matul, Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto, dan Allan Fatchan Gani Wardhana, “The Urgency of the Constitutional Preview of Law on the Ratification of International Treaty by the Constitutional Court in Indonesia,” Heliyon 7, no. 9 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2021.E07886.
  10. Huda, Ni’matul. "Urgensi Judicial Review dalam Tata Hukum Indonesia,” Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal (2008) https://dx.doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss1.art5.
  11. Sholikin, Ahmad. “Kajian Model Demokrasi: Teori dan Paradigma,” Madani Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.52166/madani.v13i02.2693.
  12. Syofyan, Yunita, Delfina Gusman, dan Alsyam. “Keterkaitan Paham Demokrasi Terhadap Sistem Hukum Indonesia Setelah Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945,” UNNES Law Review, no. 5.2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i2.354.
  13. Tanchev, Evgeni. “International and European Legal Standards Concerning Principles of Democratic Elections, dalam European Standards of Electoral Law in Contemporary Constitutionalism,” European Commission For Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission) (2004), https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-STD(2004)039-e.
  14. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum sebagaimana diubah oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2023 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
  15. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 24P/HUM/2023 mengenai Peraturan KPU No. 10 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pencalonan Anggota DPR, DPRD I dan DPRD II dan Penghapusan Segala Bentuk Diskriminasi Terhadap Wanita.
  16. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 80/PUU-XX/2022 mengenai Penambahan Jumlah Daerah Pemilihan (Dapil) dan Alokasi Kursi Calon Legislatif (Caleg) di Pemilu 2024.
  17. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 mengenai Batas Usia Calon Presiden dan Calon Wakil Presiden.
  18. Agustyati, Khoirunnisa Nur. “Membaca Kembali Putusan MK 80/2022 tentang Dapil”https://perludem.org/2023/01/23/membaca-kembali-putusan-mk-80-2022-tentang-dapil-oleh-khoirunnisa-nur-agustyati/. Diakses pada 1 Mei 2024.
  19. Basyari, Iqbal. “Tak Semua Partai Penuhi Imbauan KPU soal Jumlah Minimal 30 Persen Caleg Perempuan” https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2023/11/09/17-parpol-tak-penuhi-jumlah-minimal-30-persen-caleg-perempuan. Diakses pada 1 Mei 2024.
  20. Docket, Democracy. “The Purcell Principle” https://www.democracydocket.com/purcell/. Diakses pada 1 Mei 2024.
  21. Hamadi, Ibrahim Ghifar. “Putusan MK PHPU Pilpres 2024: Sebuah Epilog” https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/04/26/08463971/putusan-mk-phpu-pilpres-2024-sebuah-epilog?page=2. Diakses pada 1 May 2024.
  22. Hidayat, Rofiq. “Putusan MK Syarat Usia Capres-Cawapres Dinilai Menciderai Proses Pemilu” https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/putusan-mk-syarat-usia-capres-cawapres-dinilai-menciderai-proses-pemilu-lt6546586157d5d/?page=1. Diakses pada 1 Mei 2024.
  23. Mutiarasari, Kanya Anindita. “Kapan Batas Pendaftaran Capres Cawapres 2024? Cek Jadwalnya di Sini” https://news.detik.com/pemilu/d-6990585/kapan-batas-pendaftaran-capres-cawapres-2024-cek-jadwalnya-di-sini#:~:text=Pendaftaran%20capres%20dan%20cawapres%202024%20berlangsung%20selama%2019%2D25%20Oktober,Presiden%20dan%20Wakil%20Presiden%202024.&text=Pemeriksaan%20kesehatan%20bakal%20pasangan%20calon%3A%2019%2D27%20Oktober%202023. Diakses pada 1 Mei 2024
  24. Perludem. “Perludem Sebut Ubah UU adalah Tren di Setiap Jelang Pemilu: Itu Hidup dan Matinya Parpol” https://perludem.org/2023/02/25/perludem-sebut-ubah-uu-adalah-tren-di-setiap-jelang-pemilu-itu-hidup-dan-matinya-parpol/. Diakses pada 1 Mei 2024
  25. Ulya, Fika Nurul, dan Diamanty Meiliana. “Babak Baru Polemik Putusan MK Soal Batas Usia Capres dan Cawapres, Polisi Kini Terlibat” https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/11/18/08170951/babak-baru-polemik-putusan-mk-soal-batas-usia-capres-dan-cawapres-polisi?page=all. Diakses pada 1 Mei 2024.
  26. Wicaksono, Dian Agung. “Kembali Bersandar Pada MK?” https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2023/11/09/kembali-bersandar-pada-mk. Diakses pada 1 Mei 2024.