Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 17, 2019
Accepted
February 28, 2020
Published
June 29, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 533 Download : 752

Main Article Content

Abstract

Responsibility to Protect Principle (R2P) is intended to accomplish the humanitarian intervention principle which considered has a failure in many aspects. However, the existence of this principle still leaves worry, especially for a developing country, over manipulation and politics in its implementation. The formulated problems for this research are (1) how is the development of the R2P principle in International Law? (2) how is the implementation of the first pillar of R2P to prevent mass atrocities crime in the Indonesian government? The result shows that R2P gained more supports and was adopted in General Assembly resolution, completed with three pillars and six thresholds for its implementation. The implementation of the first pillar of R2P in Indonesia as a state responsibility to protect the society from mass atrocities crime has not been conducted properly. Although Indonesia already had a law on social conflict management, however, minimum law enforcement arrangement; high impunity culture, lack of knowledge about R2P, revocation of law on CTR, the impartiality of governmenttowards some majority groups potentially make the implementation of the first pillar of R2P in Indonesia will be failed.

Keywords

Intervention law enforcement mass atrocities crime R2P social conflict

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Sefriani, S. (2020). The Implementation Of The First Pillar Of Responsibility To Protect In Indonesia: Critical Analysis Of Law On Social Conflict Management. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Books
  2. Franck, Thomas M, International Change in the Law of Humanitarian Intervention” in JL Hobzgrefe& Robert O Keohane (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas, University Pres, Cambridge, 2003.
  3. Hehir, Aidan, “The Responsibility to Protect and International Law”, in Philip Cunliffe (ed.), Critical Perspectives on the Responsibility to Protect: Interrogating Theory, Practice, Martinus Nijhoff, 2011.
  4. Sulistyo, Hermawan, PaluArit di LadangTebu: Sejarah Pembantaian Massal yang Terlupakan, Jombang-Kediri 1965-66, Gramedia, Jakarta, 2000.
  5. Susetiawan, Konflik Sosial, Kajian Sosiologis Hubungan Buruh, Perusahaan dan Negara di Indonesia, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2000.
  6. Susan, N, Sosiologi Konflik dan Isu –Isu Konflik Kontemporer, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2009.
  7. Journals, Articles, Paper
  8. Ayoob, Mohammed, “Third World Perspectives on Humanitarian Intervention and International Administration”, 10 Global Governance 99, 2014.
  9. Banteka, Nadia, “Dangerous Liaisons: responsibility to Protect and reform of The Un Security Council”, 54 Colum. J. Transnat'l L, 382, 2016.
  10. Djundjunan, Bebeb A.K., Wirakara, Rizal, “The Responsibility to Protect Dalam Perspektif Hukum”, Opinion juris, Volume 01, Oktober 2009
  11. Bellamy, Alex J., “Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse? The Crisis in Darfur and umanitarian Intervention After Iraq”, Ethics &Int’LAff, Summer, 31, 2005.
  12. Daalder, Ivo & James Steinberg, “Preventive War, A Useful Tool”, L.A. TIMES, Dec 4, 2005.
  13. Defeis, Elizabeth F., “The Responsibility to Protect and International Justice”, 10 J. Int'l Bus. & L. 91, 2011.
  14. Feinstein, Lee & Anne-Marie Slaughter, “A Duty to Prevent”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.83, No.1, Jan-Feb, 2004.
  15. Hamilton, Rebecca J., “The Responsibility to Protect: From Document to Doctrine-But What of Implementation?, 19 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 289, 2006.
  16. Hutagalung, Daniel, “Negara dan Pelanggaran HAM Masa Lalu: Tuntutan Pertanggungjawaban versus Impunitas” (State and human right violation in the past: claim of responsibility versus impunity), Dignitas, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2005.
  17. Kelly, Michael J., “Pulling at the Threads of Westphalia: “Involuntary Sovereignty Waiver”? Revolutionary International Legal Theory or Return to Rule by the Great Powers?”,10 UCLA J. Int'l. L. & For. Aff. 361, 2005.
  18. Koskenniemi, Martti, “The Police in the Temple Order, Justice, and the UN: A Dialectical View”, 6 Eur. J. Int’L law 1, 1995.
  19. Linton, Suzannah, “Accounting for Atrocities in Indonesia”, 10 SYBIL 199, 2006.
  20. Levitt, Jeremy I., “The Responsibility to Protect: A Beaver Without a Dam?”, 25 MICH. J. INT'L L. 153, 2003.
  21. Macfarlane, S. Neil et.al.,“The Responsibility to Protect: Is Anyone Interested in Humanitarian Intervention?”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 5, 977, 2004.
  22. Mainstreaming the Responsibility to Protect Southeast Asia: Pathway toward Caring ASEAN Community, Report of the High Level Advisory Panel on the Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia, Presented at the United Nations, New York, September 9th, 2014.
  23. Malone, David M., “Recent Books on International Law”, 97 AM. J. INT'L L. 999, 1001, 2003.
  24. Muladi, “Hakekat Norma R2P atau Responsibility to Protect danAmbang Batas Justifikasinya”, article on Upgrading Recent Issues of International Law doctrine, held by Association of lecturer of international law cooperate with Faculty of Law, UniversitasDiponegoro, Semarang, 20-21 May, 2011.
  25. Payandeh, Mehrdad, “With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility? The Concept of the Responsibility to Protect Within the Process of International Lawmaking”, 35 Yale J. Int'l L. 469, 2010.
  26. Rahayu, “Eksistensiprinsip Responsibility to protect dalam Hukum Internasional”, article in Upgrading Recent Issues of International Law Doctrine, held by Association of Lecturer of International Law Cooperate With Law Faculty, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 20-21 Mei 2011.
  27. Reisman, W. Michael, “Criteria for the Lawful Use of Force in International Law”, 10 Yale J. Int'l L. 279, 1985.
  28. Sarkin, Jeremy, “Is the Responsibility to Protect An Accepted Norm in International Law in the post-Libya Era?”,Groningen Journal of International Law, Vol. 1 No. 9, 2012.
  29. Scheffer, David J., “Toward a Modern Doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention”, 23 U. Tol. L Rev, 253, 1992.
  30. Scheffer, David, “Atrocities Crimes Framing the Responsibility to Protect”, 40 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 111, 2007-2008.
  31. Small, Michael, “An Analysis of the Responsibility to Protect Program in Light of the Conflict in Syria”, 13 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 179, 2014.
  32. St. Aisyah BM, “Konflik Sosial Dalam Hubungan Antar Umat Beragama”, Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, Vol. 15, No. 2, December 2014.
  33. David, “The Lonely Pragmatist: Humanitarian Intervention in an Imperfect World”, 18 BYU J. PUB. L. 1, 2003.
  34. News, Article from Internet, Thesis
  35. Bagwell, Kyle & Robert W. Staiger, “National Sovereignty in an Interdependent World”, Nat'l Bureau of Econ. Research, Working Paper No. 10249, 2004, available at http:// www.nber.org/papers/w10249
  36. Gareth Evans, “Russia and the “Responsibility to Protect”, Opinion L.A. Times, Aug, 31, 2008, in https://www.latimes.com/la-oe-evans31-2008aug31-story.html
  37. ELSAM, “Implementasi Konsep R2P di Indonesia: Prospekatau Tantangan, available at http://elsam.or.id/2017/09/implementasi-konsep-r2p-di-indonesia-prospek-atau-tantangan/
  38. Lapasau, Rizcky Ramadhan “Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Amuk Massa Tinjauan dari Pasal 55 KUHP (Punishment to Actor of Riot in the perspective of Article 55 Indonesian Penal Code), Lex et Societatis, Vol. III/No. 10/Nov/20
  39. Mohammad Zulfan Tadjoeddi, “Anatomy of Social Violence in the Transition Context: Case of Indonesia, 1990-2001”, working paper: 02 / 01-1, United Nations Support Facility for Indonesian Recovery (UNSFIR), 2002, available at http://www.conflictrecovery.org/bin/Zulfan-Anatomi_kekerasan_sosial.pdf
  40. “Responsibility to Protect: Informasi tentang Prinsip ini dan Langkah-langkah Implementasi”, available at http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/ R2P_basic_info_Bahasa.pdf
  41. Perundang-undangan
  42. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2012 tentang Penanganan Konflik Sosial
  43. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2012.