Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 26, 2020
Accepted
November 27, 2020
Published
March 16, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 660 Download : 933

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the philosophical basis in the legal finding school of thoughts used by religious court judges and their orientation in resolving sharia economic disputes. The research problem is answered by using a normative method with a case and conceptual approach. The results of the research and discussion conclude that first, sharia economic dispute resolution has a philosophical foundation from the values of Pancasila, especially the first, second and fifth principles. Second, there are two different orientations of religious court judges in deciding sharia economic disputes, namely legism oriented and begriffjurisprudenz orientation. Amongst the various decisions, there are judges that are still oriented towards legism, namely deciding disputes based on existing positive laws, based on the Civil Code (KUHPer) even though the dispute is a sharia economic dispute. There are also many judges who have an orientation to begriffjurisprudenz, in this case the judge uses the basis of Islamic law, namely the Al Quran, Hadith and the Fatwa of the National Sharia Council (DSN) of the Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) and the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES) in their decisions in addition to using the Civil Code (positive law).

Keywords

Philosophical orientations religious court sharia economic disputes

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Rosidah, Z. N., & Karjoko, L. (2021). Orientasi Filosofis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 28(1), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss1.art8
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Kaelan, Filsafat Pancasila Pandangan Hidup Bangsa Indonesia, Paradigma, Yogyakarta, 2002.
  3. Karjoko, Lego, Pembadanan Asas Fungsi Sosial Hak Guna Usaha dalam Pengaaturan Perkebunan yang Mensejahterakan rakyat, Disertasi, Pascasarjana UNS, Surakarta, 2017
  4. Kartika Rahayu, Muji, Sengketa Mazhab Hukum, Sintesis Berbagai Mazhab dalam Pemikiran Hukum, Penerbit Buku Kompas, Jakarta, 2018.
  5. Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Penemuan Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Lyberti, Yogyakarta, 2009.
  6. Mukhlas, Oyo S., Dual Banking System & Penyelesaian Sengekta Ekonomi Syariah, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2019.
  7. Nur Rosidah, Zaidah, dkk, Aspek Keadilan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Melalui Pengadilan Agama, LP2M IAIN Surakarta, Surakarta, 2016.
  8. Sulistiyono, Adi, Mengembangkan Paradigma Non-Litigasi di Indonesia, Sebelas Maret University Press, Surakarta, 2006.
  9. Suadi, Amran, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah dalam Teori dan Praktek, Kencana, Depok, 2017.
  10. ______, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Penemuan dan Kaidah Hukum, Prenada media Group, Jakarta, 2018.
  11. Jurnal
  12. Arief Budiman, Achmad, Penemuan Hukum Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Dan Relevansinya Bagi Pengembangan Hukum Islam Indonesia, Al-Ahkam Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, Volume 24, Nomor 1, April 2014.
  13. Fatchurohman, Wilda Nugraismia, Tri Wahyuni, Fahmi Medias , Penyelesaian Sengketa Nasabah Wanprestasi Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Magelang dalam Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2018.
  14. Hariyanto, Erie, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia, dalam Jurnal Iqtish al-Ihkâmadia, Vol 1. Nomor 1, 1 Juni 2014.
  15. Nurul Musjtari, Dewi , Pembaharuan Hukum dalam Bidang Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, dalam Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 19, Nomor 2 Agustus 2017.
  16. Setyowati, Ro’fah, Perlindungan ‘Hak Spiritual’ Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah: Praktik Di Malaysia Dan Indonesia, dalam Jurnal Share, Volume 5, Number 2, July - December 2016.
  17. Setyowati, Ro’fah, Indah Purbasari, Encik Muhammad Fauzan, Consumers Spiritual Rights in the Islamic Banking Dispute Out of Court Settlement in Indonesia dalam Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 2018:9 (4).
  18. Internet
  19. Rasyid, Abdul, Perkembangan Lembaga Perbankan Dan Keuangan Syariah Di Indonesia, https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/07/03/perkembangan-lembaga-perbankan-dan-keuangan-syariah-di-indonesia/, diakses 25 Juni 2020.
  20. https://www.hestanto.web.id/lembaga-keuangan-syariah-lks/, diakses 25 Agustus 2020.
  21. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/kategori/jenis/ekonomi-syari-ah-1.html, diakses 25 Juni 2020.
  22. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/tentang-syariah/Pages/PBS-dan-Kelembagaan.aspx, diakses 25 Agustus 2020.

Most read articles by the same author(s)