Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 10, 2019
Accepted
August 1, 2019
Published
August 22, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2560 Download : 3052

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study is aimed to analyse various Indonesian national regulations that govern about the implementation of social and environmental responsibility (SER) in the actualisation of its objectives for the equitable distribution of natural resources in Indonesia. The analysis is undertaken in terms of the phrases used, the subjects who are obliged to perform SER, the funding sources, the allocation of the funds, the instructed programs, as well as the course of the SER itself. By using normative legal research, this study concludes that the existing regulations have not consistently governed the implementation and standards of SER as expected by the Government. Additionally, according to Fuller, this kind of multi-interpretation will result in the malfunction of legal products, and ultimately frustrate the achievement of the SER objectives. On this matter, it is proposed that the Indonesian government needs to formulate a regulation that comprehensively and specifically govern about the SER to become a guideline for all the existing stakeholders.

Keywords

Dysfunctional regulations equitable distribution of benefits social and environmental responsibility

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Karjoko, L., Santosa, J., & Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2019). Disfungsi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 26(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Elkington, John, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone, Minnesota, 1999.
  3. Mardikanto, Totok, CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) (Tanggungjawab Sosial Korporasi), Alfabeta, Bandung, 2014.
  4. Schumacher, E. F., Small is Beautiful: Economics As If People Mattered, Harper & Row, New York, 1973.
  5. Soemarwoto, Otto, Dampak Lingkungan dan Masyarakat, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2000.
  6. Zafer, M. R., Jurisprudence: An Outline, International Law Book Series, Kuala Lumpur, 1994.
  7. Jurnal
  8. Adinugroho, Samuel R., Budiharto, Joko Priyono, “Pelaksanaan tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan PT. Pertamina Semarang (Persero) ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas”, Diponegoro Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 1, 2007.
  9. DesJardins, Joseph, “Corporate Environmental Responsibility,” Journal of Business Ethics Vol. 17 No. 8, 1998.
  10. Mohr, Lois A., Deborah, J. Webb dan Katherine E. Harris, “Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impacts of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Affairs Vol. 35 No. 1, 2001.
  11. Murphy, Colleen, “Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law”, Law and Philosophy Vol. 24, 2005.
  12. Ireland, Paddy, “Limited Liability, Shareholder Rights and the Problem of Corporate Irresponsibility,” Cambridge Journal of Economics Vol. 34 No. 5, 2010.
  13. Perkins, Douglas D. dan Marc A. Zimmerman, “Empowerment Theory, Research, and Application,” American Journal of Community Psychology 23(5), 1995.
  14. Waagstein, Patricia Rinwigati, “The Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and Implications”, Journal of Business Ethics Vol. 98, 2010.
  15. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  16. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
  17. Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2001 Nomor 136.
  18. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 4297.
  19. Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 4724.
  20. Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 4756.
  21. Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 4959.
  22. Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 5059.
  23. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 47 Tahun 2012 tentang Tanggung Jawab Lingkungan dan Sosial Perseroan Terbatas, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2012, Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 5305.
  24. Peraturan Menteri Badan Usaha Milik Negara Nomor PER-02/MBU/07/2017 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Menteri Badan Usaha Milik Negara Nomor PER-09/MBU/07/2015 tentang Program Kemitraan dan Program Bina Lingkungan Badan Usaha Milik Negara, Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2017 Nomor 1002.