Main Article Content

Abstract

Up to the present, Ahe discussion of secondary rules or state responsibility law under International law is still on the debate of the international community. However, state responsibility can be claimed on the international relations when a state is disadvantaged by the other state, because of the violation of the obligations which raises from treaty, customary international law, or because of not fulfilled the international court decision.

Keywords

ILC Draft On State Responsibility

Article Details

How to Cite
sefriani, sefriani. (2016). Pemohon Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Hukum Internasional (Studi Kritis Terhadap ILC Draft On State Responsibility 2001). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 12(30), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol12.iss30.art3

References

  1. Dixon, Martin, Textbook on International Law, Biackstone Press Limited, Fourt Edition, 2000
  2. Huaia AdoW,Aspek-Aspek Negara Dalam Hukum Intemaslonal, Rajawaii Pers, Jakarta, Cetakan Pertama, 1991
  3. Mohamad Buitian Tsani, Hukum dan Hubungan Intemaslonal, Liberty, Yogyakarta, Cetakan 208 JURNAL HUKUM. NO. 30 VOL.12 SEPTEMBER 2005:193 - 209
  4. Sefriani. Pemohon Tanggung Jawab Negara Dafam ...Pertama,1990
  5. Shaw, M.N, InternationalLaw, Grotius Publication, third edition, 1991
  6. Makalah/Artikel
  7. Daniel Bodansky andJohnRCrook, "Symposium The ILC'S State Responsibility Article introduction and Overview", dalam American Journal of international Law(AJIL),Vol 96,2002
  8. Edith Browns Weiss," Invoking StateResponsibilty in the Twenty-First Centuries", dalam American Journal of International Law (AJIL),Vol. 96,2002
  9. Georg Nolle, "From DIoniso Anzillotti to Roberto Ago: The Classical International Law of State Responsibility and the Traditional
  10. Primacy of a Bilateral Conception of Inter-state Relations", dalam European Journal of Intemational Law (EJIL) 2002,Vol.13 No.5
  11. Ifdhal Kasim, "Prinsip-Prinsip Van Boven mengenai KorbanPelanggaran HAM", makalah pada Penataran Tingkat Advanced Hukum Humaniter infernastonal dan HAM ,kerjasama Unilak RIau dan ICRC, Pakanbaru, 2003
  12. Irmanputra Sidin, "Asas Legalitas PeradilanHAM," dalam harian Kompas. Senin 8 April 2002
  13. James Crawford, 'The Relationship between Sanction and Countenmeasures" dalamEuropean Joumal of International Law
  14. (EJIL) 2002,Vol. 13 No.3.
  15. Mark Gibney, Katarina Tomasevski and Jens Vedsted-Hansen, 'Transnasional State Responsibility for Violation of Human Rights, dalam Harvard Human Riohts Journal. Vol 12, Spring1999
  16. Mohamad Mova AI'Afghani, 'Kewajiban Swedia untuk melakukan due Diligence Terhadap permasalahan Hasan Tiro", makalah pada workshop on International Legal Process, Hotel Ibis ,25-26 Juli
  17. ,
  18. http//www.theceli.com/berita/detailphp?tipe=a&news=B2, diakses 5 Maret 2004
  19. Supriyadi, "Pelanggaran HAM yang berat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana. Nasional dan Internasional", dalam jurnal Mimbar Hukum. No. 43/11/2003, FH UGM, Yogyakarta www.sekitarkita.eom/glosari/t.htm-9k Dokumen Draft articles on Responsibilty ofStates for in
  20. ternationally Wrongful Acts , iLC, November 2001
  21. Putusan Pengadlian European Court on Human Right, Al-Adsani v
  22. United Kingdom, App. No.35763/97, paragraf 10, November, 21,2001
  23. http://www.echr.coe.int/eng/judaments. htm East Timor case (Portugal v Australia), 1995 ICJ Report.