Main Article Content

Abstract

Basically, the thrust of international credit is the same as domestic thrust credit Their differences are theparties involved more so that the contract they made is more complect, the timeis longer, there is guarantee of credit taking and the difference of countries. The Parties must be criticized carefully although in general the thrust of international credit need a board arbitration on solution for dispute.

Keywords

credit thrust dispute arbitration

Article Details

How to Cite
Nazarudin, N. (2016). Perjanjian Anjak Piutang Internasional. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 9(19), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss19.art8

References

  1. Asikin, Zainal. Pokok-pokok Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia. Jakarta;
  2. Raja Graflndo Persada. 1997.
  3. Black, Henry Campbell. Black Law Dictionary. St. Paul Minn: West
  4. Publishing Company. 1979.
  5. Dipo, Handowo. Sukses Memperoleh Dana Usaha dengan Tinjauan Khusus Modal Ventura. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti. 1993.
  6. Fuady, Munir. Hukum tentang Pembiayaan dalam Teorl dan Praktek. Bandung; CitraAditya Bakti, 1995.
  7. Ginting, Ramelan. "Pengembangan Perbankan". Artikel. Nopember-Desember 1993.
  8. Houte, Hans van. The Law of International Trade. London: Swett & Maxwell. 1995.
  9. Slamat, Dahlan. Manajemen Lembaga Keuangan. Jakarta: Intermedia. 1995.
  10. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
  11. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan diperbarui dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan
  12. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
  13. Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 1251/KMK.013/1988
  14. Keputusan Presiden Nomor 61 Tahun 1988 tentang Lembaga Pembiayaan