Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 17, 2017
Published
January 17, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1140 Download : 2478

Main Article Content

Abstract

The implementation of administrative sanctions in Government Regulation No. 101 of 2014 on the Management of Hazardous and Toxic Waste (B3) has emerged a polemic in the form of inconsistency in the sanction enforcement under Act No. 32 of 2009 on the Protection and Management of the Environment (Law PPLH). Under the provisions concerning with the management of B3 waste as regulated in the Act of PPLH, criminal sanction is enforced as premium-remedium without any first enforcement of administrative sanctions. This study observed two issues: first, the urgency and the strategy of sharpening the existence of the administrative sanctions in the Regulation No. 101 of 2014 of the Law No. 32 of 2009. Second, it concerns with the effectiveness of the administrative sanctions in the management and supervision of B3 waste. This is a normative juridical law research. The study concluded that: first, although based on the law of PPLH criminal law is enforced in medium premium, but the role and presence of the administrative sanctions in the B3 waste management is necessary especially to develop any preventive measures against environmental pollution caused by the B3 waste. Second, although the Act of PPLH has applied the criminal sanctions in premium remedium, but the implementation of administrative sanctions is more effective and provides a protection against the threat of environmental pollution from waste B3.

Keywords

Urgency effectiveness administrative sanction Hazardous and Toxic Waste (B3)

Article Details

How to Cite
Mardhatillah, S. R. (2017). Urgensi dan Efektifitas Sanksi Administrasi dalam Pengelolaan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23(3), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss3.art7
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Daftar Pustaka
  2. Buku
  3. Arief, Barda Nawawi, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1996.
  4. Hamzah, Andi, Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2005.
  5. Machmud, Syahrul, Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2012.
  6. Manan, Bagir, Hubungan antara Pusat dan Daerah Menurut UUD 1945, Jakarta, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1994.
  7. Rahmadi, Takdir, Hukum Pengelolaan Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun, Airlangga University Press, Surabaya, 2003.
  8. Rangkuti, Siti Sundari, Hukum Lingkungan dan Kebijaksanaan Lingkungan Nasional, Airlangga University Press, Surabaya.
  9. Sulistina, Teguh & Aria Zurnetti, Hukum Pidana, Horizon Baru Pasca Reformasi, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2011.
  10. Supriadi, Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia: Sebuah Pengantar, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006.
  11. Artikel Jurnal
  12. Ariefianto, Harry Agung, Penerapan Sanksi Administrasi Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Kegiatan Industri, Unnes Law Journal, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2015.
  13. Kartono. “Penegakan Hukum Administratif dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidupâ€, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 9 Nomor 3, September 2009.
  14. Moestadji. “Peran Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Konsep Pembangunan Berkelanjutanâ€, Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tahun I Nomor 1, Jakarta, ICEL.
  15. Widyawati, Lidya Suryani. “Ultimum Remedium dalam Bidang Lingkungan Hidupâ€, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Istum, Volume 22, Nomor 1, Januari 2015.
  16. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 140).
  17. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 101 Tahun 2014 tentang Pengelolaan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Tahun 333).

Most read articles by the same author(s)