Main Article Content

Abstract




This study aims to identify students’ perceptions and knowledge related to Academic Dishonesty (AD), specifically plagiarism and cheating. This is a survey study. The data were collected using an adapted questionnaire developed by Ledesma (2011); the data were gathered from students whose school applies academic integrity as the basic rules. Nine statements in four domains are included in the questionnaire. Non-probability sampling technique was used in this survey study by involving 122 respondents from various senior high schools. The result shows that students do not perceive Academic Dishonesty (AD) as misconduct. Out of 9 examples of AD, most of the participants agree that cheating is only when they copy their peers’ exact answers on a certain test. Meanwhile, they tend to discount other statements as a form of AD. This research could be an underlying base for stakeholders to know the students’ perception of AD, which eventually will help implement the Indonesia Ministry of Education’s character-building program.




Keywords

academic dishonesty cheating plagiarism senior high school

Article Details

How to Cite
Fadila, S. A. P. . (2022). Students’ Perception on Academic Dishonesty in a Senior High School. Journal of English and Education (JEE), 8(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v8i1.23293

References

  1. Bacha, N. N. (2007). Research of EFL Students’ Writing at Two Lebanese English Medium Universities. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 17, 129–135.
  2. Bacha, N. N., Bahous, R., & Nabhani, M. (2012). High schoolers’ views on academic integrity. Research Papers in Education, 27(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.550010
  3. Doró, K. (2014). Why Do Students Plagiarize? Efl Undergraduates’ Views on the Reasons Behind Plagiarism. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 11(1), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.2478/rjes-2014-0029
  4. Eastman, K. L., Eastman, J. K., & Iyer, R. (2008). Academic Dishonesty: An Exploratory Study Examining Whether Insurance Students Are Different From Other College Students. Risk Management & Insurance Review, 11(1), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 6296.2008.00138.x
  5. Hrabak, M., Vujaklija, A., Vodopivec, I., Hren, D., Marusic, M., & Marusic, A. (2004). Academic misconduct among medical students in a post-communist country. Medical Education, 38(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01766.x
  6. Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2015). Chinese University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 25(3), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2014.923313
  7. Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic Dishonesty: Are More Students Cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569911404059 Kerkvliet, J. (1994). Cheating by Economics Students: A Comparison of Survey Results. The Journal of Economic Education, 25(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1994.10844821
  8. Kerkvliet, J., & Sigmund, C. L. (1999). Can We Control Cheating in the Classroom? The Journal of Economic Education, 30(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220489909596090
  9. Ledesma, R. G. (2011). Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students in a Korean University. Research in World Economy, 2(2), p25. https://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v2n2p25
  10. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024954224675
  11. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
  12. Rathore, F. A., Waqas, A., Zia, A. M., Mavrinac, M., & Farooq, F. (2015). Exploring the attitudes of medical faculty members and students in Pakistan towards plagiarism: A cross sectional survey. PeerJ, 3, e1031. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1031
  13. Razek, N. A. (2014). Academic Integrity: A Saudi Student Perspective. Academic of Education Leadership Journal, 18(1), 13.