Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 14, 2022
Accepted
November 30, 2022
Published
November 30, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 309 Download : 309

Main Article Content

Abstract

Google Docs has been reported by many researchers as a tool that facilitates EFL students’ performance enhancement in writing class, but the facts in using this tool from teachers’ point of view in managing a writing class still lack attention. This article aims to describe how Google Docs can assist EFL teachers in managing writing classes as well as the strategies that can be carried out to optimize the use of this tool. Using narrative inquiry, this study employed a teacher’s narratives and documentation of activities on Google Docs. Thematic coding was done to highlight meaningful experiences. It revealed that Google Docs assisted both students and teachers in terms of proofreading, giving feedback, and recording students’ activities. However, during the use of this tool, sort of challenges might hinder students’ progress, such as students’ ignorance of the helpful features and failure in complying with the instructions. Therefore, English teachers can prepare some strategies i.e. giving clear rules and instructions, having conferences and synchronous interaction more often on Google Docs, and building up students’ responsibility for the learning progress. It implies that technology itself doesn’t guarantee students’ improvement in writing, but teachers’ and students’ ability and responsibility in using the technology contribute more to the progress.

Keywords

EFL Google Docs writing class

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Atin Kurniawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Kurniawati, A. (2022). Google Docs to Manage an EFL Writing Class: How It Helps and What to Prepare . Journal of English and Education (JEE), 8(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v8i2.25740
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alharbi, M. A. (2020). Exploring the potential of Google Doc in facilitating innovative teaching and learning practices in an EFL writing course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1572157
  2. Awada, G. M., & Diab, N. M. (2021). Effect of online peer review versus face-to-face peer review on argumentative writing achievement of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1912104
  3. Barkhuizen G., Benson P., & Chik A. (2014). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research (4th ed.). Routledge.
  4. Bowen, N. E. J. A., Thomas, N., & Vandermeulen, N. (2022). Exploring feedback and regulation in online writing classes with keystroke logging. Computers and Composition, 63, 102692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2022.102692
  5. Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942
  6. Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry: A methodology for studying lived experience. Research Studies in Music Education, 27(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X060270010301
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Ed.). Pearson Education.
  8. Duijnhouwer, H., Prins, F. J., & Stokking, K. M. (2010). Progress feedback effects on students’ writing mastery goal, self-efficacy beliefs, and performance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611003711393
  9. Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056
  10. Farid, S., & Samad, A. A. (2012). Effects of different kind of direct feedback on students’ writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.265
  11. Han, T., & Sari, E. (2022). An investigation on the use of automated feedback in Turkish EFL students’ writing classes. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2067179
  12. Hoang, D. T. N., & Hoang, T. (2022). Enhancing EFL students’ academic writing skills in online learning via Google Docs-based collaboration: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2083176
  13. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
  14. Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/44.4.294
  15. Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. Sytem, 33(4), 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002
  16. Mansor, A. Z. (2012). Google Docs as a collaborating tool for academicians. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.295
  17. Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45, 100469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469
  18. McCarthy, K. S., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Likens, A. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2022). Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback support high-quality writing and revision? Assessing Writing, 52, 100608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100608
  19. Mills, M. S. (2013). Collaborative presentations using Google Docs. In S. P. Ferris, & A. H. Wilder (Eds), The Plugged-In Professor (pp. 151–163). Elsevier.
  20. Mohammed, M. A. S., & AL-Jaberi, M. A. (2021). Google Docs or Microsoft Word? Master’s students’ engagement with instructor written feedback on academic writing in a cross-cultural setting. Computers and Composition, 62, 102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102672
  21. Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019). Using Google Docs for peer-then-teacher review on middle school students’ writing. Computers and Composition, 54, 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524
  22. Pham, H. T. P. (2021). Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: Student feedback and revision in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530
  23. Prata, M. J., de Sousa, B., Festas, I., & Oliveira, A. L. (2019). Cooperative methods and self-regulated strategies development for argumentative writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1427037
  24. Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816
  25. Rastgou, A. (2022). How feedback conditions broaden or constrain knowledge and perceptions about improvement in L2 writing: A 12-week exploratory study. Assessing Writing, 53, 100633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100633
  26. Saeed, M. A., & Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2022). Exploring teacher interactive e-feedback on students’ writing through Google Docs: Factors promoting interactivity and potential for learning. The Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786711
  27. Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (2014). The effects of collaborative writing activity using Google Docs on students’ writing abilities. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 148–156.
  28. Yu, S. (2021). Feedback-giving practice for L2 writing teachers: Friend or foe? Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100798
  29. Yu, S., Zheng, Y., Jiang, L., Liu, C., & Xu, Y. (2021). “I even feel annoyed and angry”: Teacher emotional experiences in giving feedback on student writing. Assessing Writing, 48, 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100528
  30. Zhu, W. (2001). Performing argumentative writing in english: Difficulties, processes, and strategies. TESL Canada Journal, 19(1), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v19i1.918