Main Article Content

Abstract

This qualitative case study investigates how EFL teachers and students collaboratively enact Exploratory Practice (EP) principles in intensive reading instruction at an Indonesian university. Drawing on classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and reflective journals, the research explores the pedagogical integration of EP’s seven key principles, including puzzle-posing, mutual development, and reflective inquiry. Findings reveal that EP transforms the reading classroom into a space for shared exploration, where both teachers and learners co-construct meaning, deepen engagement with texts, and foster a supportive learning community. Teachers shifted from delivering fixed content to facilitating dialogic discussions around learner puzzles, while students became more reflective and agentive in their reading practices. The enactment of EP led to improved teacher-student relationships, enhanced metacognition, and greater emotional investment in learning. However, challenges emerged, including time constraints, discomfort with open-ended inquiry, and misalignment with standardized assessments. Despite these tensions, the study underscores the potential of EP to humanize reading instruction by centering learner voice, inquiry, and well-being. This research contributes to the growing literature on practitioner research in language education, offering insights into the enactment of EP in skill-specific domains and advocating for more inclusive, inquiry-driven pedagogy in EFL contexts.

Keywords

EFL learners Exploratory Practice Intensive reading Learner agency Reflective pedagogy

Article Details

How to Cite
Sri, M., Emilia, E., & Safrina, R. (2026). Exploratory practice in action: EFL teachers’ and students’ collaborative engagement in intensive reading activities . Journal of English and Education (JEE), 12(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v12i1.42601

References

  1. Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner: an introduction to exploratory practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.se/books?id=Hr11DwAAQBAJ
  3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (6th Edition). SAGE Publications.
  4. Davis, C., & Parmenter, L. (2021). Student-staff partnerships at work: Epistemic confidence, research-engaged teaching and vocational learning in the transition to higher education. Educational Action Research, 29(2), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1792958
  5. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2023). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  6. Gillies, R. M. (2020). Dialogic teaching during cooperative inquiry-based science: a case study of a year 6 classroom. Education Sciences, 10(11), 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110328
  7. Hanks, J. (2017). Exploratory practice in language teaching: Puzzling about principles and practices. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45344-0
  8. Hanks, J. (2021). Co-production and multimodality: Learners as co-researchers exploring practice. Educational Action Research, 29(3), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1812417
  9. Hanks, J. (2024). Shifting perceptions of inclusive practitioner research: Epistemological affordances of exploratory practice. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241265432
  10. Hiratsuka, T., & Nall, M. (2023). Enhancing student quality of life in language classrooms via Joint Exploratory Practice. System, 118, 103148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103148
  11. Huang, H.-W., Mills, D. J., & Tiangco, J. A. N. Z. (2024). Inquiry-based learning and technology-enhanced formative assessment in flipped EFL writing instruction: Student performance and perceptions. Sage Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241236663
  12. Kato, Y. (2023). Puzzles in exploratory practice: The role of why questions. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231220447
  13. Lammert, C. (2023). How do teachers use inquiry and advocacy as curriculum? A longitudinal study. Action in Teacher Education, 45(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2023.2209039
  14. MacLure, M. (2024). “Something comes through or it doesn’t”: Intensive reading in post-qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(6), 1647–1654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2024.2342696
  15. Miller, I. K., Cunha, M. I. A., & Allwright, D. (2021). Teachers as practitioners of learning: the lens of exploratory practice. Educational Action Research, 29(3), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1842780
  16. Nurhadi, K., Basthomi, Y., Sulistiyo, U., Widiati, U., & Misdi, M. (2024). “Online group discussion was challenging but we enjoyed it!” An exploratory practice in extensive reading. Qualitative Research Journal, 24(5), 682–699. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-10-2023-0147
  17. Persky, A. M., Lee, E., & Schlesselman, L. S. (2020). Perception of learning versus performance as outcome measures of educational research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(7), ajpe7782. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7782
  18. Ramdani, J. M., Baker, S., & Gao, X. (Andy). (2023). Exploratory practice as a professional development strategy for English-language teachers in Indonesia. RELC Journal, 54(2), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231152944
  19. Ramdani, J. M., & Gao, X. (Andy). (2024). Exploratory practice for teacher professional development in Indonesia. TESOL Journal, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.775
  20. Slimani-Rolls, A., & Miller, I. K. de. (2024). The influence of Exploratory Practice (EP): How a group of former Brazilian ELT teacher-learners perceive the value of EP years after graduation. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241255051
  21. Song, X., Razali, A. B., Sulaiman, T., & Jeyaraj, J. J. (2024). Impact of project-based learning on critical thinking skills and language skills in EFL context:A review of literature. World Journal of English Language, 14(5), 402. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n5p402
  22. Steenberghs, N., Lavrijsen, J., & Verschueren, K. (2023). Teacher-student relationships and engagement of high-ability students: An exploration from the perspective of the academic risk hypothesis. High Ability Studies, 34(2), 249–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2023.2189573
  23. Trinter, C. P., & Hughes, H. E. (2021). Teachers as curriculum designers: Inviting teachers into the productive struggle. RMLE Online, 44(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2021.1878417
  24. Uştuk, Ö. (2024). Getting puzzled about puzzling: Doing my first exploratory practice on self-directed English language learning. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241254991
  25. Zhuo, M., & Huang, J. (2024). Using exploratory practice to teach: An innovative way to explore students’ speaking difficulties. TESOL Journal, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.746
  26. Zhuo, M., & Tang, H. (2024). Understanding Students’ English-speaking difficulties: An exploratory practice approach with web 2.0. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241253002