Main Article Content

Abstract

Vocabulary learning increasingly highlights formulaic sequences, particularly collocations, which are essential but persistently difficult for language learners. Traditional instruction often overlooks collocational use in writing, and existing language awareness research focuses mainly on grammar and passive vocabulary gains, with limited evidence regarding metalanguage’s role in collocation use. Addressing these gaps, the present study investigates the effect of the Language Awareness Approach on intermediate learners’ use of collocations in essay writing, as well as their perspectives toward this approach. Adopting a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design, the study employed quasi-experimental design, with two classes comprising 50 students assigned as an experimental group and a control group. Pre- and post-tests were used to assess changes in collocational performance, while questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were then employed so that learners’ perspectives on the approach can be captured. The quantitative results revealed that although both groups improved, the experimental group demonstrated clearer gains in the accuracy and variety of lexical collocations.
Qualitative findings revealed strong affective, cognitive, and social engagement, with these dimensions reinforcing each other. Two further patterns refined the picture: the value of metalanguage was conditional rather than categorical, and learners’ reliance on teacher guidance suggests that the approach functions as guided rather than autonomous discovery. From the findings, implications for learners, teachers and syllabus designers, together with theoretical contributions to metalanguage and language awareness, are proposed.

Keywords

collocations engagement metalinguistic awareness language awareness approach

Article Details

How to Cite
Vo, T. (2026). The effect of language awareness approach on intermediate learners’ use of collocations in essay writing. Journal of English and Education (JEE), 12(1). Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEE/article/view/46566

References

  1. Ainley, J., Pratt, D., & Hansen, A. (2006). Connecting engagement and focus in pedagogic
  2. task design. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500401971
  3. Alderson, C., C. Clapham & D. Steele (1997). Metalinguistic knowledge, language
  4. aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 1(2), 93-121. 10.17265/1539-8080/2015.01.004.
  5. Alqaed, M. A. (2022). The effect of an explicit awareness-raising approach on
  6. lexical collocation awareness and knowledge (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester).
  7. Andrews, S. (ed.) (2003). Special issue: Teacher language awareness. Language
  8. Awareness, 12(2), 79–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/ELT/CCN033
  9. Aybek, S. (2025). Phraseological patterns in learner academic english: insights from
  10. corpus driven approaches. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 9(1), 69–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.138
  11. Badger, R. (2018). From input to intake: Researching learner cognition. TESOL
  12. QUARTERLY, 52(4), 1073-1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.448
  13. Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Engagement with the language:
  14. How examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. In Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 209-239). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.09bar
  15. Bahns, J., & Eldaw, M. (1993). Should we teach EFL students collocations?. System, 21(1),
  16. -114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(93)90010-E
  17. Basterrechea, M., & Leeser, M. J. (2019). Language-related episodes and learner proficiency
  18. during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awareness, 28(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1606229
  19. Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R. (1997). The BBI dictionary of English word
  20. combinations.
  21. Berry, R. (2004). Awareness of metalanguage. Language Awareness, 13(1), 1-16.
  22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410408667082
  23. Bolitho, R., & Tomlinson, B. (1995). Discover English: A language awareness
  24. workbook (New ed.). Heinemann.
  25. Bolitho, R., Carter, R., Hughes, R., Ivanič, R., Masuhara, H., & Tomlinson, B. (2003).
  26. Ten questions about language awareness. ELT journal, 57(3), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.251
  27. Bourke, J. M. (2008). A rough guide to language awareness. English Teaching
  28. Forum, 46(1), 12-21.
  29. Boulton, A. and Cobb, T. (2017), Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis.
  30. Language Learning, 67: 348-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224
  31. Borg, S. (1994). Language awareness as a methodology: Implications for teachers and
  32. teacher training. Language Awareness, 3(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1994.9959844
  33. Bui, T. L. (2021). The role of collocations in English teaching and learning.
  34. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(2), 99-109. https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/26
  35. Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
  36. Cao, D. T. P. (2018). The effect of an online collocation dictionary on advanced
  37. learners' use of collocations in L2 writing (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).
  38. Cao, D., & Deignan, A. (2019). Using an online collocation dictionary to support
  39. learners’ L2 writing. In C. Wright, L. Harvey, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Voices and practices in Applied Linguistics: Diversify a discipline (pp. 233-249). White Rose University Press. https://doi.org/10.22599/BAAL1.n
  40. Carter, R. (2003). Language awareness. ELT Journal: English Language Teaching
  41. Journal, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.1.64
  42. Chan, S. Y. C. (2025). “Writing is re-writing”: Developing language awareness
  43. through a process-oriented approach in an EFL academic writing course. In English for Academic and Specific Purposes in the Classroom (pp. 172-190). Routledge.
  44. Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student
  45. engagement. Handbook of research on student engagement, 365-386.
  46. Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for
  47. pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
  48. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th
  49. ed.). Routledge.
  50. Cowie, A.P. (1994). Phraseology. In: R.E. Asher (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and
  51. linguistics (pp. 3168–3171). Oxford: Pergamon.
  52. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating
  53. quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
  54. Daneshfard, F., & Saadat, M. (2025). Learning collocations: Exploring EFL learners'
  55. Beliefs and Strategies. Research in English Language Pedagogy (RELP), 13(1). http://doi.org/10.71673/relp.2025.1126097
  56. Darr, C. W. (2012). Measuring student engagement: The development of a scale for
  57. formative use. In Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 707–724). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_34
  58. Ding, C., Reynolds, B. L., Szabo, C. Z., & Boone, G. (2025). Assessing English
  59. language learners’ collocation knowledge: A systematic review of receptive and productive measurements. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 63(2), 833-856. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0163
  60. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative,
  61. qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
  62. Du, X., Afzaal, M., & Al Fadda, H. (2022). Collocation use in EFL learners’ writing
  63. across multiple language proficiencies: A corpus-driven study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 752134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.752134
  64. Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2009). To what extent do native and non-native writers
  65. make use of collocations?. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 47(2), pp.157-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.007
  66. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with
  67. implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024
  68. Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and
  69. second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.x
  70. Fortune, A., & Thorp, D. (2001). Knotted and entangled: New light on the
  71. identification, classification and value of language related episodes in collaborative output tasks. Language awareness, 10(2-3), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410108667031
  72. Fu, L., & Huang, F. (2025). Exploring Learners' Engagement with Feedback in L2
  73. Academic Writing: Insights from a Multiple Case Study. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 48, 139-152. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.48.09
  74. Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus‐based
  75. language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language learning, 67(51), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12225
  76. Ghanmi, R., & Navracsics, J. (2025). Metalinguistic awareness, writing competence
  77. and lexical diversity in bilingual and multilingual adults in Hungary learning English as an additional language. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2025.2517337
  78. Gledhill, C. J. (2000). Collocations in science writing (Vol. 22). Gunter Narr Verlag.
  79. Granger, S., & Bestgen, Y. (2014). The use of collocations by intermediate vs. advanced
  80. non-native writers: A bigram-based study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(3), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0011
  81. Guariento, W., & Morley, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT
  82. Journal, 55(4), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.4.347
  83. Haryanti, D. U., Rasyid, F., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). A path analysis on writing anxiety,
  84. writing attitude, language awareness, and writing achievement of university students. Englie: English Learning Innovation, 3(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v3i1.19657
  85. Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A., Vitta, J., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A
  86. systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28, 201 - 230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289.
  87. Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
  88. Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773
  89. Huang, Q., Abdul Samat, N., & Haladin, N. B. (2024). The role of exposure condition,
  90. awareness and item type in developing implicit and explicit knowledge of collocational rules. Cognitive Processing, 25(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-024-01191-3
  91. Isaee, H., & Barjesteh, H. (2025). Does Consciousness Raising Task Promote EFL Learners’
  92. Recall and Retention of Collocations?. Journal of Studies in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 15-35.
  93. Johnson, M. D., & Tabari, M. A. (Eds.). (2025). Cognitive task complexity and second
  94. language performance: Understanding L2 learner affect and engagement. Taylor & Francis.
  95. Kaivanpanah, S., & Miri, M. (2017). The Effects of task type on the quality of resolving
  96. language‐related episodes and vocabulary learning. TESOL Journal, 8, 920-942. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.311.
  97. Kilgarriff, A. (2004). Itri–04–08 The sketch engine eds. In EURALEX Proceedings
  98. Khatoon, R., Sanif, S., & Saleem, H. (2023). Effect of tasks on learners’ understanding of
  99. collocations and its influence on the writing performance of L2 learners. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters. https://doi.org/10.18488/73.v11i4.3568.
  100. Khoii, R., & Sharififar, S. (2013). Memorization versus semantic mapping in L2
  101. vocabulary acquisition. ELT journal, 67(2), 199-209 https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs101
  102. Khoja, H. Y. Y. (2019). Exploring the use of collocation in the writing of
  103. foundation-year students at King Abdulaziz University (Doctoral
  104. dissertation, University of Leeds).
  105. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford:
  106. Pergamon.
  107. Lai, Q., Alias, B. S., & Hamid, A. H. A. (2025). Happy minds, effective learners:
  108. Investigating the impact of metacognitive strategies on foreign language enjoyment. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(2), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8391
  109. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2014). Complexity theory. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The
  110. Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 73–88). Routledge.
  111. Lee, S. (2025). The relationship between receptive and productive knowledge of L2
  112. English collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 109-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12605
  113. Lee, S. (2025). Developmental characteristics of learners’ productive knowledge of L2
  114. collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12728
  115. Leow, R. P. (1997). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language
  116. learning, 47(3), 467-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00017
  117. Lessard-Clouston, M. (2013). Teaching Vocabulary. TESOL International Association.
  118. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Hove,
  119. England: Language Teaching Publications.
  120. Mahvelati, E. H. (2019). Explicit and implicit collocation teaching methods:
  121. Empirical research and issues. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(3), 105-116. http://doi.org/10.7575//aiac.alls.v.10n.3p.105
  122. Maru, M., & Pajow, C. (2021). Emotional, behavioral and cognitive engagement in
  123. language learning: The experience of the successful learners. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching and Literature, 19, 337-353. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v19i2.1118.
  124. McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
  125. McCarthy, M., & O'dell, F. (2017). English collocations in use: Intermediate.
  126. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  127. McEnery, A., Brezina, V., Gablasova, D., & Banerjee, J. V. (2019). Corpus linguistics, learner
  128. corpora and SLA: employing technology to analyze language use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 74-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000096
  129. Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J. (2014). Teachers' views of language knowledge. In
  130. Language awareness in the classroom (pp. 40-50). Routledge.
  131. Nakamura, S. (2025). Engagement. ELT Journal, 79(2), 297-299.
  132. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaf002
  133. Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and
  134. some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.223
  135. Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam: John
  136. Benjamins Publishing Company.
  137. Nguyen, C. T. (2022). EFL students' perceptions of the effects of the integration of
  138. reading and writing on their writing skills. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(6), 1177-1187. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.05
  139. Nguyen, T. M. H., & Webb, S. (2017). Examining second language receptive knowledge of
  140. collocation and factors that affect learning. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 298-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816639619
  141. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research
  142. synthesis and quantitative meta‐analysis. Language learning, 50(3), 417-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
  143. Paquot, M., & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual
  144. Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000098
  145. Paquot, M. (2019). The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research.
  146. Second Language Research, 35(1), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317694221
  147. Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading.
  148. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815618428
  149. Pienemann, M. (1985). “Learnability and syllabus construction”. In Hyltenstam, K.
  150. and M. Pienemann (eds.), Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 23-75.
  151. Reynolds, B. L., & Teng, M. F. (2021). Innovating teacher feedback with writing
  152. activities aimed at raising secondary school students' awareness of collocation errors. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(3), 423-444. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.3.6
  153. Robinson, P., Mackey, A., Gass, S. M., & Schmidt, R. (2013). Attention and
  154. awareness in second language acquisition. In The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). Routledge.
  155. Robinson, P. (2016). Attention and awareness. In J. Cenoz & D. Gorter (Eds.),
  156. Language awareness and multilingualism (pp. 125–134). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02240-6_8
  157. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. D. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness:
  158. Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in second language acquisition, 21(4), 511-556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004015
  159. Roehr-Brackin, K. (2018). Metalinguistic awareness and second language acquisition. Routledge.
  160. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661001
  161. Riehl, C. M. (2021). The interplay of language awareness and bilingual writing abilities in
  162. heritage language speakers. Languages, 6(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6020094
  163. Rychlý, P. (2008). A lexicographer-friendly association score. In RASLAN (pp. 6-9).
  164. Schmidt, R. W. (Ed.). (1992). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning
  165. (Vol. 9). National Foreign Language Resource Center.
  166. Siekman, B., Spit, S., Verhagen, J., & Andringa, S. (2025). Metalinguistic awareness
  167. in adult emergent readers. A scoping literature review of empirical studies. Language Awareness, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2025.2587298
  168. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.
  169. Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge.
  170. Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Blackwell.
  171. Sulis, G. (2022). Engagement in the foreign language classroom: Micro and macro
  172. perspectives. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102902.
  173. Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2005). Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching,
  174. (4), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004491
  175. Svalberg, A. M.-L., & Askham, J. (2015). A dynamic perspective on student language
  176. teachers’ different learning pathways in a collaborative context. In J. King (Ed.), The dynamic interplay between context and the language learner (pp. 172–193). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
  177. Svalberg, A. M. L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct.
  178. Language awareness, 18(3-4), 242-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197264
  179. Svalberg, A. M. L. (2018). Researching language engagement; current trends and
  180. future directions. Language Awareness, 27 (1-2), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1406490
  181. Svalberg, A. M. L., & Askham, J. (2020). Teacher and learner perceptions of adult foreign
  182. language learners’ engagement with consciousness-raising tasks in four languages. Language awareness, 29(3-4), 236-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1785483
  183. Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in second language learning.
  184. Plenary address at BAAL Language Learning and Teaching SIG Conference: Language Use, Language Processing and Language Learning, 19–20 April, Southampton University
  185. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent
  186. French immersion students working together. The modern language journal, 82(3), 320-337.Tomlinson, B. (1994). Pragmatic awareness activities. Language awareness, 3(3-4), 119-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1994.9959850
  187. Tong, Y., & Singh, B. (2025). The Interaction between Learning Engagement and Academic
  188. Achievement in Second Language Acquisition: A Multivariate Analysis. Forum for Linguistic Studies. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.10142
  189. Van de Poel, K., & Bester, Z. (2025). Raising language awareness to foster
  190. self-efficacy in pre-professional writers of English as a Foreign Language: a case study of Czech students of Electrical Engineering and Informatics. Language Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2024-0097
  191. Van Vu, D. (2022). Incidental collocation learning from different modes of input and
  192. factors that affect learning (Doctoral dissertation, KU Leuven Leuven).
  193. Watson, A. (2025). Metalinguistic Knowledge and Writing Development. In
  194. Secondary English for Generation Alpha (pp. 143-155). Routledge.
  195. Wu, Y. J. A. (2021). Discovering collocations via data-driven learning in L2 writing.
  196. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73440
  197. Wu, M. M. F. (2025). Language awareness: more than just better language learning.
  198. Discover Education, 4(1), 1-16. http://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00911-x
  199. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
  200. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772
  201. Wright, T. & R. Bolitho (1993). Language awareness: A missing link in language teacher
  202. education?. ELT Journal, 47(4), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.4.292
  203. Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018). Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In
  204. A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy (pp. 37–56). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.02wul
  205. Yuan, X., & Tang, J. (2025). Incidental learning of collocations under different
  206. input modes and the mediating role of perceptual learning style. Language and Speech, 68(2), 262-277. http://doi.org/10.1177/00238309241266864
  207. Zhang, Z. (2020). Learner engagement and language learning: A narrative inquiry of a
  208. successful language learner. The Language Learning Journal, 50, 378 - 392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786712
  209. Zhang, M., & Crawford, W. (2021). Attention to form in collaborative writing:
  210. Language-related episodes in L1 and L2 use conditions. Language Awareness, 31, 194 - 212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1998087
  211. Zhang-Wu, Q., & Tian, Z. (2025). Unpacking the complex journey of developing
  212. critical language awareness: identity, resistance, and transformation. Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices, (aop), e1Editorial. https://doi.org/10.3138/jmtp-1-Editorial