Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to determine waqf literacy products in journals in Indonesia and Malaysia, especially cash waqf, which is expected to address the problem of low public understanding of cash waqf and may be due to not being supported by adequate literacy products. Research on waqf literacy products that focus on cash waqf is more due to the increasing trend of cash waqf, along with its great potential. The research method uses bibliometric mapping with metadata obtained from the Publish or Perish (PoP) application to access Google Scholar by filtering the titles Cash Waqf Indonesia and Malaysia and its publications in the form of journals. To visualize the bibliometric network, this study used the VOSViewer version 1.6.19. The accessed journals are limited to the last five years, 2018-2023. From the search results, Cash Waqf Indonesia had 106 journal articles, and Cash Waqf Malaysia had 40. Indonesian and Malaysian cash waqf literacy products published in journals are few. Likewise, cash waqf studies associated with productive waqf themes are still few in number, and the focus of productive waqf studies is still limited to sukuk and micro-enterprises. The low level of public understanding of cash waqfs in Indonesia and Malaysia may be partly due to the lack of literacy products.

Keywords

Cash Waqf Google Scholar Indonesia Malaysia Waqf Literacy

Article Details

How to Cite
Syibly, M. R. (2024). Cash Waqf Literacy in Indonesia and Malaysia: An Analysis of Journal Publications and Trends (2018-2023). Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 23(2), 681–702. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol23.iss2.art6

References

  1. Adeyemi, A. A., Ismail, N. A., & Hassan, S. S. B. (2016). An empirical investigation of the determinants of cash waqf awareness in Malaysia. Intellectual Discourse, 24(S1), 501-520. https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v24i0.931

  2. Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10242

  3. Aini, Z. N. (2024). Cash waqf for microfinance: A bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga, 34(1), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.20473/jeba.V34I12024.148-164

  4. As-Salafiyah, A. & Rusydiana, A. S. (2022). Finding waqf literacy strategies for millennials. International Journal of Waqf, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.58968/ijf.v2i1.84

  5. Azizah, A. A. N., Bayinah, A. N., & Handoko, L. H. (2023). Literature analysis of cash waqf: Trends and future research agenda. Ziswaf: Jurnal Zakat dan Wakaf, 10(1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v10i1.17095

  6. Beik, I. S. (2021, February 11). Literasi jadi masalah utama dalam pengembangan wakaf [Literacy is a major problem in waqf development]. Majelis Ulama Indonesia. https://mirror.mui.or.id/berita/29626/literasi-jadi-masalah-utama-dalam-pengembangan-wakaf/

  7. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106

  8. Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6

  9. Badan Wakaf Indonesia. (2020, May 20). Laporan hasil survey Indeks Literasi Wakaf nasional tahun 2020 [Report on the results of the 2020 National Waqf Literacy Index survey]. Badan Wakaf Indonesia. https://www.bwi.go.id/4849/2020/05/20/laporan-hasil-survey-indeks-literasi-wakaf-nasional-tahun-2020/

  10. Darmadji, A., Prasojo, L. D., Riyanto, Y., Kusumaningrum, F. A., & Andriansyah, Y. (2018a). Publications of Islamic University of Indonesia in Scopus database: A bibliometric assessment. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 12(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2017.1400754

  11. Darmadji, A., Prasojo, L. D., Kusumaningrum, F. A., & Andriansyah, Y. (2018b). Research productivity and international collaboration of top Indonesian universities. Current Science, 115(4), 653-658. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26978273

  12. Elena, M. (2020, October 8). Potensi wakaf ratusan triliun per tahun, literasi masyarakat masih rendah [The potential for waqf is hundreds of trillions per year, but public literacy is still low]. Bisnis.com. https://finansial.bisnis.com/read/20201008/231/1302549/potensi-wakaf-ratusan-triliun-per-tahun-literasi-masyarakat-masih-rendah

  13. Ghanny, A. R., & Fatwa, N. (2021). Indeks literasi wakaf generasi milenial [Millennial generation waqf literacy index]. Jurnal Tabarru’: Islamic Banking and Finance, 4(1), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.25299/jtb.2021.vol4(1).6884

  14. Hasan, Z., Sulaiman, A. A., & Putri, M. R. N. (2021). The influence of gross enrollment ratio (GER) on the literacy and inclusion index: A case study of Islamic finance in Indonesia. Unisia, 39(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol39.iss1.art7

  15. Husniyah, P. Z. (2019). Literasi wakaf pada masyarakat untuk memunculkan minat berwakaf: Studi pada Badan Wakaf Indonesia Jawa Timur [Waqf literacy in society to generate interest in waqf: Study at the Indonesian Waqf Board, East Java] [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya]. http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/35906/

  16. Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.

  17. Machmud, A. I., & Suryaningsih, S. A. (2020). Analisis tingkat literasi wakaf uang mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Surabaya [Analysis of the level of literacy of cash waqf of students of the Faculty of Economics, State University of Surabaya]. Jurnal Ekonomika dan Bisnis Islam, 3(3), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.26740/jekobi.v3n3.p165-179

  18. Megat Abd. Rahman, M. M. G., Othman, A., Salamon, H., Nor Muhamad, N. H., Muhtar, A., & Abdullah, A. (2006). Development of waqf land: Issues, prospect and strategies. Malaysian Journal of Real Estate, 1(2), 39-46. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11780963.pdf

  19. Mubarok, A. Z. S. (2021). Literasi wakaf uang berbasis masjid (Literation of cash waqf based on mosque). Jurnal Bimas Islam, 14(1), 132-160. https://doi.org/10.37302/jbi.v14i1.355

  20. Niswah, F. M., Hakimi, F., Fathurochman, S. F., Hafizah, I., & Indrawan, I. W. (2023). Problem and solution of stock waqf practice in Indonesia: Stakeholder's point of view. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 9(2), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol9.iss2.art11

  21. Nugraha, D. (2024). Posthumanism in Indonesian short stories and their relevance to the development of critical literacy. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(2), 929-952. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i2.1162

  22. Permatasari, A. (2015). Membangun kualitas bangsa dengan budaya literasi [Building the quality of the nation with a culture of literacy]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bulan Bahasa 2015 (pp. 146–156). Unit Penerbitan FKIP Universitas Bengkulu. https://repository.unib.ac.id/11120/

  23. Prasojo, L. D., Fatmasari, R., Nurhayati, E., Darmadji, A., Kusumaningrum, F. A., & Andriansyah, Y. (2019). Indonesian state educational universities’ bibliometric dataset. Data in Brief, 22, 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.128

  24. Priyadi, U., & Achiria, S. (2022). Social enterprise model in waqf land management in Bantul, Indonesia. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 21(3), 891–914. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss3.art10

  25. Qurrata, V. A., Mohd. Shafiai , M. H., Alma’amun , S. ., Wahid, H. ., & Ismail, A. G. . (2024). Waqf sustainability or sustainable waqf? A bibliometric analysis. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 23(1), 103–148. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol23.iss1.art4

  26. Rusydiana, A., Sanrego, Y., & Pratomo, W. (2021). Mathematical modeling on Islamic economics and finance: A scientometric. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 4834. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4834

  27. Saptono, I. T. (2019). Peluang dan tantangan wakaf di Era 4.0 [Opportunities and challenges of waqf in Era 4.0]. Insight: Buletin Ekonomi Syariah, Edisi Keempat, 5-8.

  28. Sukmana, R., Pitchay, A. A., & Jalil, M. I. A. (2021). Comparison of government and private based waqf institutions management: Case study of Indonesia and Malaysia. Labuan E-Journal of Muamalat and Society (LJMS), 15, 25–37. https://jurcon.ums.edu.my/ojums/index.php/LJMS/article/view/3479

  29. Sulistyowati, Possumah, B. T., Huda, N., Rofiqoh, S. N. I., & Zulfison. (2022). The innovation of waqf andragogy amidst ‘Kampus Merdeka’ era. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 8(1), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol8.iss1.art8

  30. Syibly, M. R., Mustaffa, N. H. ., Zulkifle, M. R. B. ., & Ndini, C. W. . (2022). A comparative analysis of legal products on the development of productive waqf in Indonesia and Malaysia. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 21(3), 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss3.art14

  31. Thamrin, L., Ghasya, D., & Pranata, R. (2023). The practicality of developing a multi-split model based on the hands-on-mind approach as a reconstruction of basic literacy and character values. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 11(3), 949-964. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i3.905

  32. van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Noyons, E. C. M., & Buter, R. K. (2010). Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 82(3), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0173-0

Most read articles by the same author(s)

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo