Main Article Content

Abstract

The publication of decisions through the Supreme Court decision directory is part of the aspect of information disclosure carried out by the Supreme Court as a form of implementation of Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Disclosure. This research examines how the protection of personal data of victim witnesses in cases of criminal acts of decency in the publication of decisions by the Supreme Court. Who can be held criminally responsible for the publication of decisions on the Supreme Court website. The legal research method used is normative. In this study it is known that legal protection is not optimal, there are still many main aspects of legal protection that have not been fulfilled such as no further arrangements regarding control efforts, mechanisms for requesting related parties to information disclosure and arrangements regarding the mechanism of legal remedies. Implementers of Information Services at the Supreme Court who can be held criminally responsible for this are PPID Executors, Information Service Officers, PPID, and/or PPID Superiors as employees who have the duties, responsibilities and authority to provide information services to the public in the event that they fulfill errors in the form of intent.

Keywords

Legal Protection Victim Personal Data Supreme Court website

Article Details

Author Biography

Putri Azzahra, Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia

 

 

References

  1. Hanafi Amrani dan Mahrus Ali, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perkembangan dan Penerapan, PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2015.

  2. Mahrus Ali, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2011.

  3. P.A.F. Lamintang, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,  1997.

  4. Satjipto Raharjo, Penegakan Hukum Sebagai Tinajauan Sosiologis, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2009.

  5. Setiono, Rule of Law (Supremasi Hukum), Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 2004. Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2006.

  6. Billy  Ridelson,  “Kajian  Hukum  Keterbukaan  Informasi  di  Pengadilan  Dalam  Rangka Implemenrasi Integritas dan Kepastian Hukum”, Lex Et Societatis, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2019.

  7. Hanifan Niffari, “Perlindungan Data Pribadi Sebagai Bagian Dari Hak Asasi Manusia tas Perlindungan Diri Pribad”, Jurnal Yuridis, No. 1, Vol. 7, 2020.

  8. Nurhidayat,  dkk,  “Pengaturan  Perlindungan  Data  Pribadi  Dalam  Penggunaan  Aplikasi Pedulilindungi”, Jurnal Sekretari dan Manajemen, No.1, Vol. 5, Maret, 2021.

  9. Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945

  10. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

  11. Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik.

  12. Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.

  13. Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi.

  14. SK KMA Nomor 1-144/KMA/SK/I/2011.

  15. SK KMA Nomor 2-144/KMA/SK/VIII/2022.

  16. Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung, 2022, Tentang Direktori Putusan, [Daring] putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/tentang.html, Diakses tanggal 22 November 2022, pukul 11.50 WIB.

  17. Ridwan Mansyur, 2015, Keterbukaan Informasi di Pengadilan Pada Penerapan Sistem Penelusuran Alur Perkara, [Daring], https://www.pn-bantul.go.id/attachments/article/58/KETERBUKAAN%20_INFORMASI_PADA_PENGADILAN.pdf, Diakses tanggal 22 November 2022 , pukul 12.36 WIB.