Main Article Content
Abstract
The aims of this research is to determine the feasibility of software to reduce misconception on students using conceptual change text strategy on chemical bonding matter. This research is using Research & Development (R&D) design with X IPA MAN Sidoarjo’s students as a subject. Instrument used are student responses, student activity observation, and pretest-posttest sheet. Software developed using PHP (Hypertext Preprocessor) programming language. The result analyzed by a descriptive quantitative method that can be conclude as (1) The validity of software is valid showed by content validity average percentage is 88,57% with very valid criteria and construct validity average percentage is 88,89% with very valid criteria (2) the practicity of software got 87,41% with very practice criteria (3) Software effective in detect and reduce misconception that showed by percentage the average shift of conception from misconception to know concept is 83.53%.
Keywords: software, misconception, conceptual change text, chemical bonding.
Article Details
Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the simultaneously licenced under A Creative Commons Attribution (CC-By-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the worsk's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
- Fahmi and Y. Irhasyuarna. Journal of Education and Practice. 8 (17) 32-39 (2017).
- P. Lestari and S. Linuwih. Unnes Physics Education Journal. 3 (2) 62–67 (2014).
- M. Ibrahim, Konsep, Miskonsepsi, dan Cara Pembelajarannya, (Unesa Press, Surabaya, 2012).
- N. K. Khoiriyah and Erman. E-Jurnal Pensa. 5 (3) 330-334 (2017).
- A. Aslan and G. Demircioglu. Procedia Social And Behavioral Sciences. 116 (1) 3115- 3119 (2014).
- N. Amin, Wiendartun and A. Samsudin. Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains (SNIPS). 4 (2) 570-574 (2016).
- Fitria, S. Priatmoko and Kasmui. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 10 (1) 1641-1650 (2016).
- D. Kici. International Journal of New Trends in Art, Sport & Science Education. 1 (2) 30–40 (2012).
- Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, (Alfabeta, Bandung, 2016).
- Q. Fariyani, A. Rusilowati, Sugianto. Journal of Innovative Science Education. 4 (2) 41-49 (2015).
References
Fahmi and Y. Irhasyuarna. Journal of Education and Practice. 8 (17) 32-39 (2017).
P. Lestari and S. Linuwih. Unnes Physics Education Journal. 3 (2) 62–67 (2014).
M. Ibrahim, Konsep, Miskonsepsi, dan Cara Pembelajarannya, (Unesa Press, Surabaya, 2012).
N. K. Khoiriyah and Erman. E-Jurnal Pensa. 5 (3) 330-334 (2017).
A. Aslan and G. Demircioglu. Procedia Social And Behavioral Sciences. 116 (1) 3115- 3119 (2014).
N. Amin, Wiendartun and A. Samsudin. Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains (SNIPS). 4 (2) 570-574 (2016).
Fitria, S. Priatmoko and Kasmui. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 10 (1) 1641-1650 (2016).
D. Kici. International Journal of New Trends in Art, Sport & Science Education. 1 (2) 30–40 (2012).
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, (Alfabeta, Bandung, 2016).
Q. Fariyani, A. Rusilowati, Sugianto. Journal of Innovative Science Education. 4 (2) 41-49 (2015).