Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 6, 2019
Accepted
April 23, 2020
Published
June 29, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 384 Download : 367

Main Article Content

Abstract

Almost every Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court has jargon carried during theis leadership. Arief Hidayat, during his reign, often put forward the term "divine light". This term is closely related to Pancasila as the ideology of the state and religion. Therefore, the purpose of expressing jargon during the leadership of a Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court must have strategic value. Moreover, when the discourse is concerned with the classic problem in finding the relationship between religion and the state. However, there is no academic study that traces the purpose of the term "divine light" as stated by Arief Hidayat. This paper intends to fill in the gap by using normative research methods and legal comparisons. The discussion in writing this article is divided into three parts. First, it reviews the normative and theoretical side of the relationship between religion and constitutionalism. Second, we will look at Arief Hidayat's background to be able to find the meaning of the term "divine light" that he uses. The last part of this paper is to examine the decisions of the Constitutional Court which contain the term "divine light" in order to seek an official interpretation of Arief Hidayat's thoughts about the divine light.

Keywords

Constitutional court divine light Pancasila religion

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Bisariyadi, B. (2020). Peradilan Berpancaran “Sinar Ketuhanan”: Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Masa Kepemimpinan Arief Hidayat (2015-2017). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(1), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss1.art10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. A. Segal, Jeffrey dan Harold J. Spaeth, The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993.
  3. Budiyanto, Ari, et al, “Memaknai Kembali Perdebatan Islam dan Pancasila”, dalam Erwien Kusuma dan Khairul (eds.), Pancasila dan Islam: Perdebatan antar Parpol dalam Penyusunan Dasar Negara di Dewan Konstituante, BAUR Publishing, Jakarta, 2008.
  4. Hendrianto, Stefanus, Law and Politics of Constitutional Court: Indonesia and the Search for Judicial Heroes, Routledge, New York, 2018.
  5. Hidayat, Arief dan FX. Adji Samekto, Hukum Lingkungan Dalam Perspektif Nasional dan Global, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro 1998.
  6. Hidayat, Arief, Kebebasan Berserikat di Indonesia (Suatu Analisis Pengaruh Perubahan Sistem Politik Terhadap Penafsiran Hukum), Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro 2006.
  7. ______, Kajian Kritis Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Di Era Otonomi Daerah, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro 2007.
  8. Hirschl, Ran, Constitutional Theocracy, Harvard University Press, 2010.
  9. Karim, M. Rusli, Negara dan Peminggiran Islam Politik, Tiara Wacana, Yogyakarta, 1999.
  10. Kusuma, Erwien dan Khairul, “Detik-detik Menjelang Bubarnya Konstituante”, dalam Erwien Kusuma dan Khairul (eds.), Pancasila dan Islam: Perdebatan antar Parpol dalam Penyusunan Dasar Negara di Dewan Konstituante, BAUR Publishing, 2008.
  11. Kusuma, RM A.B., Lahirnya Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, edisi revisi, Badan Penerbit FHUI, Jakarta, 2009.
  12. Latief, Yudi, Negara Paripurna. Historisitas, Rasionalitas, dan Aktualitas Pancasila, Gramedia Pustaka Mandiri, Jakarta, 2012.
  13. Madjid, Nurcholish, Indonesia Kita, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2004.
  14. Mousouraki, George S., Roman Law and the Origins of the Civil Law Tradition, Springer 2015.
  15. Pompe, Sebastian, Runtuhnya Institusi Mahkamah Agung, Penerjemah: Noor Kholis, Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi untuk Independensi Peradilan, 2012.
  16. Rahardjo, Satjipto, Mendudukan Undang-Undang Dasar: Suatu Pembahasan dari Optik llmu Hukum Umum, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2007.
  17. ______, Hukum dan Perilaku, Kompas, Jakarta, 2009.
  18. ______, Negara Hukum yang Membahagiakan Rakyatnya, Genta Publishing, 2010.
  19. Safitri, Myrna, Awaludin Marwan dan Yance Arizona (eds.), Satjipto Rahardjo dan Hukum Progresif: Urgensi dan Kritik, Epistema-Huma, Jakarta, 2011.
  20. Syafii Maarif Ahmad, Politik Identitas dan Masa Depan Pluralisme Kita, Democracy Project, Jakarta, 2012.
  21. Jurnal
  22. Buehler, Michael, “The Rise of Shari’a by-laws in Indonesian Districts: An Indication for Changing Patterns of Power Accumulation and Political Corruption”, 16 South East Asia Research 256, 2008.
  23. Butt, Simon, “The Function of Judicial Dissent in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court”, 4 Constitutional Review, 2018.
  24. Cserne, Péter, “Policy Arguments Before Courts: Identifying and Evaluating Consequence-Based Judicial Reasoning”, 3 Humanitas Journal of European Studies, 2009.
  25. Epstein, Lee, “Some Thoughts on the Study of Judicial Behavior”, 57 William & Mary Law Revie, 2017.
  26. Gibson, J.L., “From Simplicity to Complexity: the Development of Theory in the Study of Judicial Behaviour” 5 Political Behaviour, 1983.
  27. Hendrianto, Stefanus, “The Rise and Fall of Heroic Chief Justices: Constitutional Politics and Judicial Leadership in Indonesia”, 25 Washington International Law Journal, 2016.
  28. Hosen, Nadirsyah, “The Constitutional Court and ‘Islamic’ Judges in Indonesia”, 16 Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2016.
  29. Kapiszwecki, Diana, “Tactical Balancing: High Court Decision Making on Politically Crucial Cases”, Law and Society Review, Vol. 45., Issue 2, 2011.
  30. Maheshwari, Kartick, dan Vishnu Vardhan Shankar, “Stone Gods and Earthly Interests: The Jural Relations and Consequence of Atributing Legal Personality to Hindu Idols”, 16 Student Bar Review, 2004.
  31. Mattila, Heikki E.S., “Cross-references in Court Decisions: A Study in Comparative Legal Linguistics” dalam Tarja Salmi-Tolonen, Iris Tukianen dan Richard Foley (eds), “Law and Language in Partnership and Conflict”, 1 Lapland Law Review (Special Issue), 2011.
  32. Pranowo, M. Bambang, “Islam dan Pancasila: Dinamika Politik Islam di Indonesia”, 3 Ulumul Qur’an: Jurnal Ilmu dan Kebudayaan, 2012.
  33. Segal, Jeffrey A., “Judicial Behaviour” dalam Gregory A. Caldeira, et.al (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, OUP, 2008.
  34. Internet dan Putusan Pengadilan
  35. “Ketua MK: Hukum Indonesia Seharusnya Dibangun dengan Sinar Ketuhanan”, Berita MK, Rabu 20 Mei 2015, <http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/ index.php?page=web.Berita&id=10903#.WJvuktKLTDc.> diakses pada 23 Agustus 2018.
  36. “PA GMNI Bergerak Cepat dan Langsung Gelar Diklat Hukum”, selasa 11 Agustus 2015, <https://www.rmol.co/read/2015/08/11/213081/PA-GMNI-Bergerak-Cepat-dan-Langsung-Gelar-Diklat-Hukum-> diakses pada 28 Agustus 2018.
  37. “Sidang Kriminalisasi LGBT dan Pandangan Sinar Ketuhanan Sang Ketua MK”, Detiknews, Minggu 28 Agustus 2016, <http://news.detik.com/berita/ 3285405/sidang-kriminalisasi-lgbt-dan-pandangan-sinar-ketuhanan-sang-ketua-mk.> diakses pada 24 Agustus 2018.
  38. Halmai, Gabor, “Religion and Constitutionalism” 2015/5 MTA Law Working Papers 11-28 <https://jog.tk.mta.hu/uploads/files/mtalwp/2015_05_%20 Halmai.pdf.> diakses pada 24 Agustus 2018.
  39. Hidayat, Arief, “Bernegara itu Tidak Mudah (Dalam Perspektif Politik dan Hukum)”, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar dalam Rapat Senat Terbuka Universitas Diponegoro 51-56. diakses pada 29 Agustus 2018.
  40. Mahkamah Konstitusi Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Konstitusi tahun 2009 (MKRI 2010), <https://mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/laporantahunan/ pdf/Laporan%20Tahunan%20MK%202009_Mengawal%20Demokrasi%20Menegakkan%20Keadilan%20Substantif.pdf> diakses pada 23 Agustus 2018.
  41. Putusan Nomor 008/PUU-IV/2006 tentang pengujian Pasal 85 ayat (1) huruf c Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2003 tentang Susunan dan Kedudukan Majelis Permusyawarakatan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah dan Pasal 12 huruf b Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2002 tentang Partai Politik terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
  42. Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana atau Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 73 Tahun 1958 tentang Menyatakan Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana Untuk Seluruh Wilayah Republik Indonesia dan Mengubah Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
  43. Sri Adi Visheshwara of Kashi Vishwanath Temple, Varanasi, vs State of UP (1997) 4 SCC.