Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 30, 2020
Accepted
July 29, 2020
Published
August 25, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2124 Download : 3418

Main Article Content

Abstract

Each legal system has its own theory of statutory formation, both countries that apply civil law and common law legal systems. The tendency to form laws in Indonesia after the realization of the need for regulatory reform has resulted in a growing awareness of making breakthroughs by using the omnibus method which is generally applicable in countries that apply the common law system. The question is whether this method is suitable to be adopted into the legal system of Indonesia? This article intends to examine the compatibility of the omnibus method and the solutions that need to be used to overcome its compatibility problems. This research concludes that if Indonesia is to adopt the omnibus method, it also requires a consolidation method before and after the enactment of legislation with the omnibus method, this is intended to consolidate it with the affected legislation.

Keywords

Omnibus method statutory formation compatibility

Article Details

Author Biography

Ibnu Sina Chandranegara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta


Associate Professor Faculty of Law University of Gadjah Mada, Vice Dean Faculty of Law University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Managing Partner of Chandranegara & Prasetya: Solicitor, Counsellor, & Attorney at Law, Secretary of Law and Human Right Assembly Central Board of Muhammadiyah, Member Association of Constitutional and Administrative Law Instructor, Member Association of Constitutional Court Procedure Instructor, Member of Asociation of Indonesia Advocate. 
How to Cite
Chandranegara, I. S. (2020). Kompabilitas Penggunaan Metode Omnibus Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Asshidiqie, Jimly, Perihal Undang-Undang, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta, 2006.
  3. Black, Henry Campbell, Black's Law Dictionary: Definitions of The Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern, West Publishing Co, St. Paul, 1968.
  4. Cotterrell, Roger, The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.
  5. Damm, Jens, Leutner, Mechthild, Dayong, Niu, China's Interaction with the World: Historical and Contemporary Aspects, Lit Verlag, Zurich, 2017.
  6. Indrati, Maria Farida, Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Proses dan Teknik Penyusunan, Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 2007.
  7. Kelsen, Hans, The Pure Theory of Law, University of California Press, 1967.
  8. Legrand, Pierre ‘What Legal Transplants?, dalam Nelken, David dan Feest, Johannes (eds), Adapting Legal Cultures, Hart Publishing, Oxford, Portland, Oregon, 2001.
  9. Massier, A.B., The Voice of the Law in Transition:Indonesian Jurists and Their Languages, 1915-2000, KITLV Press, Leiden,2008.
  10. van der Vlies, I.C, Buku Pegangan Perancang Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Direktorat Jenderal Peraturang Perundang-undangan, Jakarta, 2005.
  11. Watson, Alan, Legal Transplant: an Approach to Comparative Law, University of Georgia Press, 1974.
  12. Zweigert, Konrad dan Kötz, H., An Introduction of Comparative Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
  13. Hasil Penelitian
  14. Institute of Law Science, Study Paper: Possible Use Of The Omnibus Legislative Technique For Implemetation Of Vietnam's Wto Obligations And Commitments, The World Bank, 2006.
  15. Jurnal
  16. Briffault, Richard, “The Single-Subject Rule: A State Constitutional Dilemma”, Albany Law Review, Vol. 82 No. 4, 2019.
  17. Chandranegara, Ibnu Sina, “Bentuk-Bentuk Perampingan dan Harmonisasi Regulasi,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 26 No. 3, 2019.
  18. Dodek, Adam M., “Omnibus Bills: Constitutional Constraints and Legislative Liberations”, Ottawa Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2017.
  19. Foster, Nicholas H.D, “Company Law Theory in Comparative Perspective: England and France”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2000.
  20. Gilbert, Michael D., “Single Subject Rules And The Legislative Process”, University Of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 67, No. 4, 2006.
  21. Massicotte, Louis, “Omnibus Bills in Theory and Practice”,Parliamentary Review Vol. 13, No. 1, 2013.
  22. Ruud, Millard H. “No Law Shall Embrace More Than One Subject,” Minnesota Law Review Vol. 42, No. 1, 1958.
  23. Tushnet, Mark, “The Possibilities of Comparative Law”, Yale Law Review 108, 1999.
  24. Watson, Allan, “Aspects of Reception of Law”, The American Journal Of Comparative Law Vol. 44. 1996.
  25. _______, “Legal Change: Sources of Law and Legal Culture”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 131, No. 5. 1983.
  26. _______, “Society and Legal Change”, Michigan Law Review Vol. 78, No. 5, 1980.
  27. Disertasi/Tesis
  28. Attamimi, A. Hamid S., “Peranan Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Negara: Suatu Studi Analisis Mengenai Keputusan Presiden yang Berfungsi Pengaturan Dalam Kurun Waktu PELITA I-PELITA IV”, Disertasi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 1990.
  29. Dejonghe Matthias, “Constitutional Courts: Democracy vs. Juristocracy?” Disertasi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Genht, Brussel, 2015.
  30. Widiati, Ekawestri Prajwalita, “Achieving Accessibility of Legislation via Consolidation.” Masters thesis, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, 2013.
  31. Makalah/Pidato
  32. Asshiddiqie, Jimly, UU Omnibus (Omnibus Law), Penyederhanaan Legislasi, dan Kodifikasi Administratif, tanpa tahun, tanpa penerbit.
  33. Attamimi, A. Hamid S., Ilmu Pegetahuan Perundang- Undangan (Gesetzgebungswissenchaft) Dan Pengembangan Pengajarannya Di Fakultas Hukum, Makalah dalam Diskusi Mengenai Kemungkinan Masuknya Ilmu Perundang-undangan Dalam Kurikulum Fakultas Hukum pada Penemuan Dekan-Dekan Fakultas Hukum Negeri Se-Indonesia di Bawah Konsorsium Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta, 20-21 Oktober 1989.
  34. Buana, Mirza Satria, “Menakar Konsep Omnibus Law Dan Consolidation Law Untuk Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia: Pendekatan Perbandingan Hukum Tata Negara”, Prosiding, Konferensi Nasional Hukum Tata Negara Ke-4, Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia, 2017.
  35. Farrel, John, Better Regulation in the UK, Presentasi Makalah OECD, 2015.
  36. Giorgio Bongiovanni, “Rechsstaat and Grundnorm in the Kelsenian Theory”, dalam Marijan Pavcnik dan Gianfransesco Zanetti, Legal System and Legal Science. Proceeding, 17thWorld Congress of The International Association For Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Bologna, Italy, 16- 21 June 1995.
  37. Indrati, Maria Farida, Dapatkah Undang-Undang Omnibus Menyelesaikan Masalah Tumpang Tindihnya Undang-Undang?, Bahan Rapat Dengar Pendapat Umum Badan Legislasi DPR-RI, 2 Desember 2020.
  38. Keyzer, Patrick, The Indonesian Omnibus Law: Opportunities and Challenges, Materi Kuliah Tamu, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 29 January 2020.
  39. KODE Inisiatif, Pasal-Pasal Inkonstitusional Ruu Cipta Kerja, Kajian Singkat RUU Cipta Kerja, 5 Maret 2020.
  40. Redi, Ahmad, Omnibus Law Gasasan Pengaturan untuk Kemakmuran Rakyat. Bahan Presentasi Diskusi Kolegium Jurist Institute, Rambu-Rambu Konstitusi dalam Wacana Omnibus Law, Jakarta, 5 Maret 2020.
  41. Setiadi, Wicipto, Simplifikasi Regulasi Melalui Pendekatan Omnibus Law: Suatu Keniscayaan, Orasi Ilmiah Dalam Rangka Dies Natalis Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta Ke-57, 7 Januari 2020.
  42. Shimada, Yuzuru, “Strategy and Regulatory Reform Practices in Japan: Harmonization of Central and Local Regulations in The Era of Local Autonomy”, Prosiding, Konferensi Nasional Hukum Tata Negara Ke-4, Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia, 2017.
  43. Umar, Bobby Gafur, Omnibus Law guna Menjawab Tantangan dan Peluang Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Makalah dalam Seminar Dies Natalis Fakultas Hukum UGM, 13 Februari 2020.
  44. Usfunan, Jimmy Z., “Mengharmoniskan Undang-Undang Melalui Omnibus Law Model Indonesia”, Prosiding, Konferensi Nasional Hukum Tata Negara Ke-4, Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia, 2017.
  45. Artikel Koran
  46. Koran Sindo, 5 November 2019, Wicipto Setiadi, “Menggagas Undang-Undang Sapu Jagat".
  47. PeraturanPerundang-undangan
  48. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 82, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5234.
  49. Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Tentang Kebijakan Keuangan Negara Dan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Untuk Penanganan Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) dan/atau Dalam Rangka Menghadapi Ancaman Yang Membahayakan Perekonomian Nasional Dan/Atau Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020 Nomor 8, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6485)
  50. RancanganUndang-UndangTentangCiptaKerjaversi Surat PresidenRepublik Indonesia Nomor: R-06/Pres/02/2020 Tanggal 7 Februari 2020.