Article Sidebar

Applying Al-Ta’lil bi Al-Hikmah to Social Media Use A Complementary to the Maqasid Shariah Approach in Islamic Digital Ethics
Submitted
October 3, 2025
Accepted
February 13, 2026
Published
February 18, 2026
Download
PDF Review Reports Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 444 Download : 42

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The rapid expansion of social media has generated significant ethical challenges, including misinformation, harmful online discourse, privacy erosion, and excessive digital consumption. Although Islamic ethics has increasingly engaged these issues, primarily through Maqasid Shariah-based frameworks, existing approaches often remain too general to guide the everyday moral decisions faced by individual users in digitally mediated environments. Addressing this gap, this study examines the application of al-Ta’lil bi al-Hikmah, a jurisprudential method that derives ethical judgment from the underlying wisdom (hikmah) of Islamic norms, to contemporary social media use. Employing a qualitative jurisprudential analysis grounded in usul fiqh, the study conducts an interpretive textual analysis of Quranic injunctions, Prophetic traditions, and classical juristic discussions to identify core ethical wisdom related to communication, privacy, moderation, and accountability. These insights are then thematically applied to key domains of social media practice, including content sharing, online criticism, time management, and the ethical implications of algorithmic influence at the level of user behaviour. The analysis demonstrates that a hikmah-centred approach enables more nuanced moral discernment than rule-based or exclusively Maqasid-oriented models by translating higher ethical objectives into actionable guidance for individual digital conduct. Conceptually and methodologically, this study advances Islamic digital ethics by operationalising al-Ta’lil bi al-Hikmah as a complementary framework that refines Maqasid reasoning at the micro-ethical level. In doing so, it offers a principled yet flexible model for ethical social media engagement that aligns individual integrity with broader Islamic moral objectives.

Keywords

Al-Ta’lil Bi Al-Hikmah Algorithmic Ethics Digital Ethics Islamic Social Media Ethics Maqasid Shariah Misinformation Social Media Use

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Md Azzaat Ahsanie Lokman, Muaz Mohd Noor, Nurin Sofiya Mohamad Nadzli, S Salahudin Suyurno, Muhammad Safwan Harun, Saim Kayadibi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Lokman, M. A. A., Mohd Noor, M., Mohamad Nadzli, N. S., Suyurno, S. S., Harun, M. S., & Kayadibi, S. (2026). Applying Al-Ta’lil bi Al-Hikmah to Social Media Use: A Complementary to the Maqasid Shariah Approach in Islamic Digital Ethics. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 25(1), 291–324. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol25.iss1.art8
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Funding data

References

  1. Abdillah, N. (2021). Hukum dan etika berinteraksi melalui media sosial menurut Islam [Laws and ethics of interacting through social media according to Islam]. FATAWA: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 1(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.37812/fatawa.v1i2.275

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37812/fatawa.v1i2.275

  2. Abokhodair, N., Elmadany, A., & Magdy, W. (2020). Holy tweets: Exploring the sharing of the Quran on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415230

  3. Abu Zayd, W. A. (2015). Al-Maqāṣid al-Juz’iyyah: Ḍawābiṭuhā, Ḥujjiyyatuhā, Waẓā’ifuhā, wa Atharuhā fī al-Istidlāl al-Fiqhī. Dar al-Maqasid.

  4. Ahmad, N., Ma, M. K., Rahman, S. F. A., Mahmood, S. R. S., Razak, N. A. M., & Mohamad, S. N. A. (2025). The Islamic ethical principles and Maqasid al-Shariah to enhance digital competency among adolescents. UMRAN - Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 12(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2025.12n3.833

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2025.12n3.833

  5. Aiman Noh, N., Lokman, M. A. A., Suyurno, S. S., & Ayub, M. S. (2023). Islamic views on the objectives of social media usage: A systematic literature review. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(SI14), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI14.5051

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v8iSI14.5051

  6. Akbar, M., & Safdar, A. (2023). Politics of hate and social media: Thematic analysis of political hate discourses on Facebook. Global Social Sciences Review, 8(2), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(VIII-II).33

  7. al-Kamali, A. A. bin Y. bin M. (2013). Al-Ta’lil bi al-Hikmah ’Inda “Ulama” al-Usul wa Atharuhu fi al-Fiqh al-Islamiy (1st ed.). Ghurās li al-Nashr wa al-Tawzī‘.

  8. Aliman, S. (2017). Maqasid-based protection assessment model for user generated content. In The doctoral research abstracts (Vol. 12, p. 19). Institute of Graduate Studies, UiTM. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/18969/

  9. Allumai, F. (2024). Addressing the phenomenon of unconstructive criticism in social media through foundation and application according to the sciences of the principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Jordan Journal of Islamic Studies, 20(3), 319–348. https://doi.org/10.59759/jjis.v20i3.542

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.59759/jjis.v20i3.542

  10. Auda, J. (2008). Maqāṣid al-Sharīʻah: A beginner’s guide. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

  11. Bakar, M. D. (2018). Membumikan Syariah: Menjelajahi dimensi Syariah secara 360 darjah [Grounding Sharia: Exploring the 360-degree dimensions of Sharia] (1st ed.). Telaga Biru Sdn. Bhd.

  12. Barrett-Maitland, N., & Lynch, J. (2020). Social media, ethics and the privacy paradox. In C. Kalloniatis & C. Travieso-Gonzalez (Eds.), Security and privacy from a legal, ethical, and technical perspective (p. 224). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90906

  13. Bhargava, V. R., & Velasquez, M. (2020). Ethics of the attention economy: The problem of social media addiction. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(3), 321–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.32

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.32

  14. Boatman, D., Jarrett, Z., Starkey, A., Conn, M. E., & Kennedy-Rea, S. (2024). HPV vaccine misinformation on social media: A multi-method qualitative analysis of comments across three platforms. PEC Innovation, 5, 100329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100329

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100329

  15. Chowdhury, M. A. I. (2024). Usage of social media: Islamic perspective. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.19908

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.19908

  16. De, D., El Jamal, M., Aydemir, E., & Khera, A. (2025). Social media algorithms and teen addiction: Neurophysiological impact and ethical considerations. Cureus, 17(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77145

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77145

  17. Fanindy, M. N., & Mupida, S. (2021). Pergeseran literasi pada Generasi Milenial akibat penyebaran radikalisme di media sosial [Shifts in literacy among Millennials due to the spread of radicalism on social media]. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 20(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol20.iss2.art1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol20.iss2.art1

  18. Farida, S., & Faozan, A. (2022). Ethics of social media from Maqashid Syari’ah perspective. International Proceedings of Nusantara Raya, 1(1), 298–301. https://doi.org/10.24090/nuraicon.v1i1.145

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/nuraicon.v1i1.86

  19. Faverio, M., Anderson, M., & Park, E. (2025, April 22). Teens, social media and mental health [HTML]. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/04/22/teens-social-media-and-mental-health/

  20. Febriani, S. R., & Ritonga, A. W. (2022). The perception of Millennial Generation on religious moderation through social media in the digital era. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 21(2), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss2.art1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss2.art1

  21. Fitria, R., Anisah, H., Hatami, H., & Fauziannor, A. (2025). The role of Islamic values in addressing hoaxes and misinformation in digital media: A systematic literature review. Al-I’lam: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 9(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.31764/jail.v9i1.35287

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jail.v9i1.35287

  22. Grigorescu, A., & Baiasu, D. (2023). Digital ethics in social media. 19, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/gekos2022/02

  23. Hajli, N. (2016). Ethical environment in the online communities by information credibility: A social media perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3036-7

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3036-7

  24. Hakim, W. R. (2025). Reaktualisasi filsafat etika Ibnu Miskawaih dalam konstruksi budaya bermedia sosial [Reactualization of Ibn Miskawaih’s ethical philosophy in cultural construction using social media]. Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 10(2), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.14421/mjsi.v10i2.4673

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/mjsi.v10i2.4673

  25. Harahap, I. (2017). Pendekatan al-Maṣlaḥah dalam fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) nomor 24 tahun 2017 tentang hukum dan pedoman bermuamalah melalui media sosial [The al-Maṣlaḥah approach in the fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) number 24 of 2017 concerning the law and guidelines for transactions via social media]. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 3(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v3i1.679

  26. Harefa, S. (2025). The fundamental principles of Islamic law in the digital era: An Ushul Fiqh and Maqashid Sharia approach. Journal of Islamic Law on Digital Economy and Business, 1(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.20885/JILDEB.vol1.iss1.art6

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/JILDEB.vol1.iss1.art6

  27. Harun, M. S., Abdullah, L., Idris, M. A. H., Meerangani, K. A., & Ali, A. K. (2025). The concept of al-Thawābit and al-Mutaghayyirāt in technological innovation according to Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 24(2), 573–610. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol24.iss2.art1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol24.iss2.art1

  28. Ibrahim, A. H., Rahman, N. N. A., & Saifuddeen, S. M. (2018). Maqasid al-Shariah as a complementary framework for conventional bioethics: Application in Malaysian assisted reproductive technology (ART) fatwa. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1493–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9963-6

  29. Ibrahim, A. H., Rahman, N. N. A., Saifuddeen, S. M., & Baharuddin, M. (2019). Maqasid al-Shariah based Islamic bioethics: A comprehensive approach. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 16(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09902-8

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09902-8

  30. Islamy, A. (2021). Paradigma sosial profetik dalam bermuamalah di media sosial [Prophetic social paradigm in Muamalah on social media]. Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah FDIK IAIN Padangsidimpuan, 3(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.24952/tad.v3i1.3842

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/tad.v3i1.3842

  31. Juliansyahzen, M. I. (2023). Ideologization of Hijrah in social media: Digital activism, religious commodification, and conservative domination. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 22(1), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol22.iss1.art6

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol22.iss1.art6

  32. Khoerunnisa. (2025). Protecting family honor on social media: A digital ethics framework from the perspective Maqashid Sharia. Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Islamic Studies (ICIS) 2025: Islam, Environment, and Sustainability (An Ecotheological Perspective), 483–491. https://proceeding.uingusdur.ac.id/index.php/icis/article/view/3034

  33. Lokman, M. A. A. B. (2025). A review of classical and contemporary Usul Fiqh scholars’ perspectives on the method of al-Ta’lil bi al-Hikmah. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(20), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90200004

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90200004

  34. Lokman, M. A., & Ibrahim, B. (2017). The development of the terminology of al-Hikmah in the history of Usul al-Fiqh. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 745–760. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i6/3034

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i6/3034

  35. Meerangani, K. A., Harun, M. S., & Mansor, M. S. (2025). Prinsip Fiqh dalam penyebaran maklumat berasaskan kecerdasan buatan (AI) di media sosial [Fiqh principles in disseminating information based on artificial intelligence (AI) on social media]. Jurnal Fiqh, 22(2), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol22no2.2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol22no2.2

  36. Musyarrofah, U., & Zulhannan, Z. (2023). Religious moderation in the discourse of Nahdlatul Ulama’s Dakwah in the era of industry 4.0. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 22(2), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol22.iss2.art5

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol22.iss2.art5

  37. Nani, M. bin A. K. (2019). Athar al-Ta’lil bi al-Maslahah fi al-Tashri’ al-Islami: Dirasah Nazariyyah Tatbiqiyyah (1st ed.). Maktabah al-Rushd.

  38. Nur, I., Hadisiswati, I., Fajarwati, H., Fithriy, H. N., & Rais, M. D. (2026). Wisdom in the digital era: Bridging human rights, Indonesian cyber law, and progressive Fiqh. The Journal of Society and Media, 10(1), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v10n1.p315-340

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v10n1.p315-340

  39. Nurhikma, Idris Alfarizi, & Kurniati. (2025). Batasan privasi dalam hukum Islam: Analisis fenomena oversharing di media sosial [The limits of privacy in Islamic law: An analysis of the phenomenon of oversharing on social media]. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.58540/jih.v1i2.745

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.58540/jih.v1i2.745

  40. Patalauskaitė, E. (2024). Ethical aspects of content creation. Filosofija. Sociologija, 35(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.3.14

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.3.14

  41. Rajagopal, R., Senbagavalli, M., D.M, D. R., Kumari, R., Gupta, D., & Gupta, A. (2024). Navigating the interplay of privacy, security and ethics on social media. 2024 2nd World Conference on Communication & Computing (WCONF), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCONF61366.2024.10692126

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WCONF61366.2024.10692126

  42. Razali, S. F., Shafie, M. S., Azzaat, M. A. A., Salahudin, S. S. B. S., Sufiean, M. S., & Ilyas, I. S. (2024). Purposes of using social media from the Islamic perspective as motivations according to experts in Islamic and communication studies. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(28), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i28.5904

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i28.5904

  43. Rosidi, M. H., Mokhtar, A. W. B., & Abdul Majid, M. N. B. (2022). The role of Maqasid al-Shari’ah as a fundamental ethics in social media use. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(4), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i4/13044

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i4/13044

  44. Sa’diyah, H., Panuluh, B. B. I., & Maria, C. S. S. (2021). Social media ethics in the context of Islamic communication: Review of the Qur’an and as Sunnah. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(4), 10247–10255. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.3061

  45. Sahih Muslim (N. A. Maqbool, Trans.). (2007). Darussalam. (Original work published ca. 875 CE).

  46. Sahil, I. (2024). Fiqh kontemporer dalam pengaturan etika media sosial bagi umat Muslim [Contemporary jurisprudence in the regulation of social media ethics for Muslims]. Journal of Economic and Islamic Research, 3(1), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.62730/journalofeconomicandislamicresearch.v3i1.141

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62730/journalofeconomicandislamicresearch.v3i1.141

  47. Saifuddeen, S. M., Rahman, N. N. A., Isa, N. M., & Baharuddin, A. (2014). Maqasid al-Shariah as a complementary framework to conventional bioethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(2), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9457-0

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9457-0

  48. Shamsuddin, M. M. J. (2024). Hukum dan garis panduan Islam bagi pempengaruh media sosial: Pandangan Maqasid Shariah [Islamic rulings and guidelines for social media influencers: Maqasid Shariah point of view]. Sains Insani, 9(2), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol9no2.699

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol9no2.699

  49. Shodiqoh, R. (2024). Digital ethics: Social media ethics in a contemporary Islamic perspective. Solo International Collaboration and Publication of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.61455/sicopus.v2i03.153

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61455/sicopus.v2i03.153

  50. Shompa, Z. A., Saidin, A. Z., Hussin, H., Muhammad, Muhd. R., & Abu Bakar, E. (2018). Guiding social media use: Proposed values and the role of Maqasid al-Shari’ah. 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT4M.2018.00019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT4M.2018.00019

  51. Shuhufi, M., Fatmawati, F., Qadaruddin, M., Basyir, J., Muhammad Yunus, M., & M.Nur, N. (2022). Islamic law and social media: Analyzing the fatwa of Indonesian Ulama Council regarding interaction on digital platforms. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 6(2), 823–843. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.15011

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.15011

  52. Simamora, I. Y., & Farid, A. S. (2024). Rethinking the use of social media in Islamic broadcasting practices: A theological perspective. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(5). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.516

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.516

  53. The Qur’an (M. A. S. Abdel Haleem, Trans.). (2008). Oxford University Press.

  54. Thoriquttyas, T., & Rohmawati, N. (2025). Maqasid al-Sharia and the digital data ownership: From al-Shatibi to Jasser Auda. Journal of Islamic Law on Digital Economy and Business, 1(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.20885/JILDEB.vol1.iss2.art5

  55. Wahab, A., & Mahdiya, I. (2025). Reconceptualizing Halal industry governance in the digital economy: A Maqasid al-Sharia based legal framework. Journal of Islamic Law on Digital Economy and Business, 1(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.20885/JILDEB.vol1.iss2.art4

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/JILDEB.vol1.iss2.art4

  56. Wati, D. R. (2023). The ethics of social media communication in the perspective of the al-Qur’an. Journal of Islamic Communication and Counseling, 2(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.18196/jicc.v2i2.28

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jicc.v2i2.28

Most read articles by the same author(s)

A General Bibliometric and Conceptual Structure Approach to Global Trend on Poverty Research in Islam Using Biblioshiny

Mohd Zaid Mustafar, Ashraff Ruslan, Mohd Khairul Nizam Mohd Aziz, Dziauddin Sharif , Md Azzaat...
Abstract View : 784
Download :412
10.20885/millah.vol24.iss2.ar8
PDF

Analysing the Contemporary Essentials of Sustainable Gig Economy Workforce From the Lenses of Maqasid Shariah

Amal Hayati Ishak, Siti Nor Amira Mohamad, Ahmad Thaqif Ismail, Noor Aznaim Abd Latib, Noorul...
Abstract View : 1377
Download :1316
10.20885/millah.vol24.iss1.art14
PDF Review Reports Originality Report