Main Article Content

Abstract

Malaysia’s Hajj management system is widely recognized for integrating financial, logistical, and religious services through a centralized institutional framework. As interest grows in using Artificial Intelligence to provide real-time religious guidance, important questions arise regarding the permissibility, reliability, and governance of AI-supported fatwa delivery. This article aims to develop a Sharīʿah-compliant framework for AI-supported fatwa in Malaysian Hajj management that aligns with maqāṣid al-sharīʿah and existing fatwa governance structures. Using a qualitative doctrinal methodology, the study analyzes principles of uṣūl al-fiqh, Malaysian legal and institutional arrangements governing fatwa issuance, Hajj-related resolutions, and contemporary scholarship on Artificial Intelligence governance and accountability. The analysis identifies key requirements for valid fatwa delivery, including scholarly competence, evidentiary reasoning, contextual awareness, and adherence to state-based authority. It further highlights recurring Hajj issues involving ritual errors, compensatory sacrifices, health concessions, women’s rulings, and travel constraints that may benefit from timely digital assistance. While Artificial Intelligence offers advantages such as rapid access, multilingual support, and personalized guidance, significant risks remain, including hallucinated rulings, jurisdictional confusion, and diminished scholarly accountability. To address these challenges, the study proposes a hybrid framework based on curated and authenticated fatwa corpora, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, authority tagging, embedded evidentiary reasoning, escalation protocols to accredited muftis, and institutional audit mechanisms. Guided by the protection of religion, life, intellect, dignity, and wealth, the framework positions Artificial Intelligence as a supportive rather than substitutive tool. The study concludes that AI-supported fatwa delivery is normatively defensible only when firmly anchored to state authority, robust governance safeguards, and the ethical objectives of Sharīʿah, providing a practical blueprint for responsible innovation in Hajj management.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Fatwa Governance Hajj Management Islamic Law Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Religious Authority Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Article Details

How to Cite
Ab Razak, M. R. B., Drs Nasrul, M. A. B. ., & Abbas, I. . (2026). Towards a Sharīʿah-Compliant Framework for AI-Supported Fatwa in Malaysian Hajj Management: A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah and Governance Perspective. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 25(1), 39–80. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol25.iss1.art2

References

  1. Ab Rahim, S. F., Ab Rahman, M. F., Abdullah Thaidi, H. A., Nik Mohd Azimi, N. N. M. A., & Jailani, M. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence for fatwa issuance: Guidelines and ethical considerations. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 30(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol30no1.654

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol30no1.654
  2. Abbasi, M. Z. (2025). Scaling artificial intelligence for augmented learning: Developing a generative AI evaluation scale through a case study in Islamic inheritance law. Journal of Digital Islamicate Research, 3(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1163/27732363-20250002

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/27732363-20250002
  3. Abidin, N. H. Z., & Nasohah, Z. (2023). The complexities of implementing gazetted fatwas in Malaysia’s federal territories. Mazahib, 22(2), 485–518. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v22i2.5862

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v22i2.5862
  4. Ade-Ibijola, A., & Nakatumba-Nabende, J. (2025). Ethical imperatives in AI design for risk mitigation and responsible innovation. Ubiquitous Technology Journal, 1(2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.71346/utj.v1i2.20

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.71346/utj.v1i2.20
  5. Adel, S., & Numan, M. (2023). Online fatwas in Pakistan using social networking platforms. Ulumuna, 27(1), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.689

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.689
  6. Adil, M. A. M. (2015). Standardisation of fatwa in Malaysia: Issues , concerns and expectations. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 6(2), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.12816/0019166

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0019166
  7. Ahmad, S. (2022). Mobile fatwa of Selangor State Department of Mufti from the aspect of user friendly. International Journal of Mosque, Zakat And Waqaf Management (Al-Mimbar), 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.53840/almimbar.v0iNo.1.38

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.53840/almimbar.v0iNo.1.38
  8. Al-Ayubi, S., & Halawatuddu’a, S. (2021). Maqasid al-Sharia in Islamic finance. Jurnal Al-Dustur, 4(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.30863/jad.v4i2.1823

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.30863/jad.v4i2.1823
  9. Ansori, I. (2017). Kedudukan fatwa di beberapa negara muslim (Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam dan Mesir) [The position of fatwa in several Muslim countries (Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam and Egypt)]. Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 17(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v17i1.1790

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v17i1.1790
  10. Asni, M. F. A. H. M., & Sulong, J. (2017). Penyelarasan fatwa antara negeri-negeri: Analisis amalan dan kaedah penyeragamannya di Malaysia: Fatwa coordination between states: Analysis of the practices of standardization and its method in Malaysia. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 9(1), 86–109. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol9no1.41

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0050567
  11. Athambawa, M. (2025). Ijtihād maqāṣidī and legal adaptation: A comparative analysis of contemporary Islamic jurisprudence in responding to emerging issues. Mazahibuna, 7(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.54378

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.54378
  12. Baalla, A., Medjouel, L., & Khouildat, S. (2024). Using E-management to solve crowd problems: Evidence from Hajj event. Majallat Abhath Kamiyya Wa Naw’iyya Fi al-Ulum al-Iqtisadiyya Wa al-Idariyya [Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Economic and Administrative Sciences], 6(2), 93–111. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/237975

  13. Bahren, R. S. A. (2025). Kedudukan fatwa di berbagai negara muslim dan dinamika budaya dalam ikhtilaf fiqih: Studi perbandingan di Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Arab Saudi [The position of fatwa in various Muslim countries and cultural dynamics in fiqh ikhtilaf: A comparative study in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia]. QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 9(2), 213–258. https://doi.org/10.21093/qj.v9i2.12065

  14. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
  15. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232078.n9
  16. Bunt, G. R. (2018). Hashtag Islam: How cyber-Islamic environments are transforming religious authority (1st ed.). University of North Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469643168.001.0001

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469643168.003.0001
  17. Cen, S. H., & Alur, R. (2024). From transparency to accountability and back: A discussion of access and evidence in AI auditing. Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3689904.3694711

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3689904.3694711
  18. Cheumar, M., & Akem, U. (2024). Adapting Malaysia’s Tabung Haji Model: A strategic proposal for Thailand’s Hajj Fund as a case study possibility. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(12), 1145–1151. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i12/24050

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i12/24050
  19. Daji, Z. M. D. (2022). An analytical reawakening of some integral organs of usul al-fiqh. Direct Research Journal of Social Science and Educational Studies (DRJSSES), 10(7), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.26765/DRJSSES9017375264

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.26765/DRJSSES9017375264
  20. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

  21. Dennehy, D., Griva, A., Pouloudi, N., Dwivedi, Y. K., Mäntymäki, M., & Pappas, I. O. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) and information systems: Perspectives to responsible AI. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10365-3

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10365-3
  22. Dinu, I.-V., Danciu, G.-M., Vintilă, R. C., & Bălan, T.-C. (2025). Disrupting large language models with hidden prompt injection attacks embedded in HTML pages. 2025 International Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines and Power Electronics (ACEMP) & 2025 International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIM-ACEMP62776.2025.11075247

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIM-ACEMP62776.2025.11075247
  23. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
  24. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  25. Greshake, K., Abdelnabi, S., Mishra, S., Endres, C., Holz, T., & Fritz, M. (2023). Not what you’ve signed up for: Compromising real-world LLM-integrated applications with indirect prompt injection. Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security, AISec ’23, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3605764.3623985

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3605764.3623985
  26. Hamdani, A. R. (2023). Fatwa in the Digital Age: Online muftī, social media, and alternative religious authority. Hikmatuna : Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, 9(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.28918/hikmatuna.v9i1.966

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.28918/hikmatuna.v9i1.966
  27. Hanifah, N. S., Rozza, S., & Roza, P. (2024). The influence of lifestyle and travel motivation on intention in using the Nusuk platform in the Umrah Mandiri Community. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 23(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2024.23.2.2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2024.23.2.2
  28. Harahap, M. A., Dodik Siswantoro, & Muhamad Abduh. (2024). Convenience in paying dam (penalty) in making hajj: A perspective aligned with the SDGs. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 25(2), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v25i02.4387

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v25i02.4387
  29. Hussain, M. A., Megat Latif, H. H., Md Nor, M. Z., Md Desa, M. R., Mohd Khalid, A.-H., & Mohd Akhir, M. A. (2018). Rujukan kepada mazhab dalam ketetapan fatwa: Analisa undang-undang pentadbiran Islam di Malaysia [References to schools of thought in fatwa rulings: An analysis of Islamic administrative law in Malaysia]. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication (IJLGC), 3(13), 236–244. https://gaexcellence.com/ijlgc/article/view/1981

  30. Ikhlas Rosele, M. I. (2018). Muzakarah Jawatankuasa Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan di Malaysia: Peranan dan relevansi penubuhannya: Muzakarah of The Fatwa Committee of The National Council in Malaysia: Its establishment role and relevancy. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 10(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol10no1.31

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol10no1.31
  31. Ismail, A. M., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2025). Parameter pengeluaran fatwa dalam kerangka maqasid syariah: Fatwa parameters in light of the Maqasid Syariah. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 13(3), 714–731. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol13no3.1244

  32. Izzati, A. N., Tumuyu, S. S., & Wardhana, Y. M. A. (2025). Reconceptualizing green sukuk through Maqashid al-Shariah for advancing sustainable development goals. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(2), 1833–1862. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art22

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art22
  33. Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Islamic Texts Society.

  34. Kamaruzaman, M. A., & Nik Abdul Ghani, N. A. R. (2025). Row discontinuity in Friday prayer: Evaluating a marjūḥ opinion in the National Hajj Muzakarah Resolution: Isu keterputusan saf solat Jumaat: Analisis pemilihan pandangan marjūḥ dalam Resolusi Muzakarah Haji Kebangsaan. Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 34(7), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.64757/alqanatir.2025.3407/1323

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.64757/alqanatir.2025.3407/1323
  35. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2020). Rulers of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 63(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.09.003

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.09.003
  36. Khapchaev, S. T. (2025). Fatwas as a tool for regulating public order in countries with Muslim law: A comparative legal analysis. Oeconomia et Jus, (4), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.47026/2499-9636-2025-4-94-111

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47026/2499-9636-2025-4-94-111
  37. Kurniawan, E., Mustaniruddin, A., Rizani, A. K., Muchimah, Zaenuri, A., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2025). Recent studies on the Maqāṣid al-Sharīʻah of Abū Isḥāq al-Shāṭibī: A systematic literature review. AJIS: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.29240/ajis.v10i1.11282

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.29240/ajis.v10i1.11282
  38. Kusnan, Osman, M. D. H. B., & Khalilurrahman. (2022). Maqashid al Shariah in economic development: Theoretical review of Muhammad Umer Chapra’s thoughts. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 21(2), 583–612. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss2.art10

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss2.art10
  39. Latifi, H. (2024). Challenges of using artificial intelligence in the process of Shi’i ijtihad. Religions, 15(5), 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050541

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050541
  40. Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS ’20, 9459–9474. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3495724.3496517

  41. Mahaiyadin, M. H., & Abdul Aziz, S. (2020). Taqlid of The Syafi’i Mazhab in Malaysia: An overview in the context of maslahah for the unity of ummah. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies, 6(1), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.24191/jcis.v6i1.9

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/jcis.v6i1.9
  42. Mahmud Zuhudi, N. A. B., Yaacob, S. E. B., & Zakaria, Z. B. (2021). Fatwa coordination in Malaysia: A literature review. International Journal of Advanced Research, 9(6), 614–622. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/13053

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/13053
  43. Majid, M. N., & Wibisono, I. S. (2024). Digital fatwā issuance mechanisms in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for harmonizing Sharia and contemporary society. Harmony Philosophy: International Journal of Islamic Religious Studies and Sharia, 1(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.70062/harmonyphilosophy.v1i1.321

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.70062/harmonyphilosophy.v1i1.321
  44. Maslan, A., & Musa, M. (2023). Isu tabungan Orang Melayu dalam sejarah pengerjaan haji era kapal laut [The issue of Malay savings in the history of the Hajj pilgrimage by ship era]. Malaysian Journal of History, Politics & Strategic Studies, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.17576/jebat.2023.5002.01

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/jebat.2023.5002.01
  45. Mat Salleh, M. K., Bahori, A., & Yahya, M. A. (2021). Position of fatwa in the constitution: A legal analysis. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(4), 2171–2188. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.04

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.04
  46. McConville, M., & Chui, W. H. (Eds.). (2017). Research methods for law. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474404259

  47. Mohd Alwi, N. H., & Azania, N. (2018). A study on ICT in fatwa management in Malaysia. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 2(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol2no1.120

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol2no1.120
  48. Mohd, H., Hashim, J., Khairuldin, W. M. K. F. W., Alwi, E. A. Z. E., & Daud, N. (2018). Women fiqah issues in the book of Fiqh Ibadat Haji, Umrah dan Ziarah issued by Malaysian Hajj Board: A ta’siliyah (foundational) study based on al-Qur’an al-Karim. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/4748

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/4748
  49. Mökander, J. (2023). Auditing of AI: Legal, ethical and technical approaches. Digital Society, 2(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00074-y

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00074-y
  50. Nasharuddin, N. A. N., & Salleh, A. D. (2025). Application of talfiq in hajj practices in Malaysia: An analysis of National Hajj Muzakarah resolutions: Pengaplikasian kaedah talfiq dalam ibadah haji di Malaysia: Analisis resolusi Muzakarah Haji Kebangsaan. Al-Qanatir: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 34(7), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.64757/alqanatir.2025.3407/1317

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.64757/alqanatir.2025.3407/1317
  51. Nasoha, Z., Laluddin, H., Mohd Kusrin, Z., & Muwazir, M. R. (2012). Standardisation of fatwa in Malaysia: Management and problems. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 6(6), 923–929. http://www.aensiweb.com/old/anas/2012/923-929.pdf

  52. Nwachukwu, P. S., Chima, O. K., & Okolo, C. H. (2025). The artificial intelligence governance framework for finance: A control-by-design approach to algorithmic decision-making in accounting. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 7(8), 350–379. https://doi.org/10.51594/farj.v7i8.2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/farj.v7i8.2016
  53. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  54. Paracha, Z. U. H., Idris, E. A. A., Ullah, F., Yousaf, A., & Alam, D. A. (2026). Impact of digital platform usability and smart service quality on pilgrim satisfaction in Makkah: A study of the Nusuk platform. Advance Journal of Econometrics and Finance, 4(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.63075/cgxqez68

  55. Rahman, N. H. A., Sofian, F. N. R. M., Asuhaimi, F. A., & Shahari, F. (2020). A conceptual model of depositors’ trust and loyalty on hajj institution—Case of Lembaga Tabung Haji Malaysia. International Review of Management and Marketing, 10(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.8315

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.8315
  56. Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873
  57. Rosidi, M. H. (2021). The impact of social media on the acceptance of fatwas among Malaysian Muslims. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 26(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol26no1.389

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol26no1.389
  58. Rosidi, M. H. (2025). Navigating fatwa governance: A comparative study of institutional centralisation and religious legitimacy. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(5), 3238–3244. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.905000252

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.905000252
  59. Rusli, R., Hasyim, M. S., & Nurdin, N. (2020). A new Islamic knowledge production and fatwa rulings: How Indonesia’s young Muslim scholars interact with online sources. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 14(2), 499. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2020.14.2.499-518

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2020.14.2.499-518
  60. Saiful Suhardi, M. S., Ibrahim, B., & Asni, F. (2024). Resolusi muzakarah haji peringkat kebangsaan: Pendekatan dan prosedur tabung haji dalam menangani isu melontar jamrah [Resolutions of the National Hajj Muzakarah: Tabung Haji’s approaches and procedures in addressing the issue of jamrah stoning]. Jamalullail Journal, 3(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.64638/jj.v3i2.011

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.64638/jj.v3i2.011
  61. Shah, A. A. (2024). Enhancing pilgrim and transport management during hajj through color-coded stripes on Nusuk cards and buses. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 24(11), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2024.24.11.2

  62. Showail, A. J. (2022). Solving hajj and umrah challenges using information and communication technology: A survey. IEEE Access, 10, 75404–75427. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3190853

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3190853
  63. Wahid, S. H. (2024). Research insights on online fatwas. A comprehensive systematic literature review. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 29(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol29no1.570

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol29no1.570
  64. Zaenal, M. H., Ismail, A. G., & Shafiai, M. H. Mohd. (2022). Philanthropy from Islamic tradition. In A. G. Ismail, R. Abdullah, & M. H. Zaenal (Eds.), Islamic philanthropy: Exploring zakat, waqf, and sadaqah in Islamic finance and economics (pp. 23–49). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06890-4_2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06890-4_2
  65. Zhang, J., Song, W., & Liu, Y. (2025). Cognitive bias in generative AI influences religious education. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 15720. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99121-6

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99121-6