Main Article Content

Abstract

The issue of PKI and the efforts of reconciliation rose by mass media every year become a controversial issue. This issue increased especially in the era of President Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur) and Joko Widodo. This research explains how Tempo and Gatra constructed PKI and framed the reconciliation issues in this two presidency era. This research uses Robert Entman’s model of framing analysis. The research found that articles in Tempo tend to place the PKI as a victim, support reconciliation efforts, and the importance of historical alignment. According to Tempo, the New Order had a major role in "shaking up" the PKI. Gatra, on the other hand, tends to be balanced and views the history of the PKI as historical traumatic for Indonesian peoples. Gatra supports reconciliation done naturally, and that history should be reexamined. The difference between the two magazines was influenced by ideology, organizational routine, and extra media power.

 

Keywords: PKI, Framing Analysis, Construction, Reconsiliatio

Article Details

Author Biographies

Meigitaria Sanita, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi FPSB Universitas Islam Indonesia

Puji Rianto, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi FPSB Universitas Islam Indonesia
How to Cite
Sanita, M., & Rianto, P. (2018). Hantu PKI dan Ujung Rekonsiliasi (Analisis Framing Pemberitaan PKI Era Presiden Abdurrahman Wahid dan Joko Widodo pada Majalah Tempo dan Gatra). Jurnal Komunikasi, 12(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol12.iss2.art5

References

  1. Andy, Tim Penulis Kick. (2011). Kumpulan KisahInspiratif 2. Yogyakarta: Bentang.
  2. Bungin, Burhan. (2008). Sosiologi Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
  3. Eryanto. (2002) Analisis Framing :Konstruksi, Ideologi dan Politik Media. Yogyakarta: Lkis.
  4. Hamad, Ibnu. (2004). Konstruksi Realitas Politik dalam Media Massa. Jakarta : Granit.
  5. Krisdinanto, N (2014). KOMUNIKATIF, Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi/Volume 3/Nomor 01 Juli 2014
  6. Mahpuddin. (2009). Ideologi Media Massa dan Pengembangan Civil. JurnalAcademicaUntad. Vol 1, No 2. http://download. portalgaruda.org/article.php 191. (Aksespada 1 Juni 2017. Pukul 15.30 WIB).
  7. Mohamad, Goenawan. 2011. Marxisme Seni Pembebasan. Jakarta: TEMPO danGrafiti Pers
  8. Nugroho, Bimo dkk. (1999). Politik Media Mengemas Berita. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
  9. Sobur, Alex. (2006). AnalisisTeks Media: suatu Pengantar untuk Analisis Wacana, Analisis Semiotik, Analisis Framing. Bandung: Remajarosdakarya.
  10. Shoemaker dan Reese.(1996). Mediating TheMaessage: Theories Of Influence On Mass Media Content. New York: Longman Publisher.
  11. Steele, Janet. (2007). Wars Within. Jakarta: Penerbit Dian Rakyat.
  12. Suwirta, Andi (2000). Mengkritisi Peristiwa G30S 1965: Dominasi Wacana sejarah Orde Baru dalam Sorotan, Jurnal Historia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, No.1
  13. Supriyatno, Dede dan Adolfo Eko Setyanto, (2012) “Representasi Citra militer Dalam Pemberitaan Majalah Tempo (Analisis Wacana Citra Militer Pada Pemberitaan Majalah Tempo Liputan Khusus Pengakuan Algojo 1965 Edisi 1-7 Oktober 2012)” Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.