Main Article Content

Abstract

The brand is one form of the identity of a product that is marketed. In order to avoid the act of plagiarism toward a brand, the government already issued Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications as a form of legal protection against brands. The purpose of this study is to find out the legal protection and legal attempts of registered brand disputes contained in court decision number 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.NiagaSby Commercial Court in Surabaya between PS Glow and MS Glow. This study is a normative legal research that uses case and statute approaches. Data sources come from secondary data with data collection methods by library research and documentary research. The result of this study shows that legal protections for both registered brands that are disputing are related to the first-to-file principle that applies in Indonesia. The brand holders of PS Glow are entitled to obtain legal protection because it has a certificate based on Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Meanwhile, the legal attempts which can be made by the registered brand holders towards the registered brand dispute are compensation claims through litigation if negotiation steps aren’t successful.

Keywords

Legal Protection Legal Attempts Registered Brand

Article Details

References

  1. Chanra Gita Dewi, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelanggaran Merek”, CV Budi Utama, 2019.

  2. Darwan Prinst, Strategi Menyusun dan Menangani Gugatan Perdata, Cetakan Pertama, Citra Aditya Bakti, Makassar, 1992.

  3. David Young, Passing off the Law and Practice relating to the Immitation of Goods Bussinesess and Professions, Third Edition, Longman, London, 1994. 

  4. Freddy Rangkuti, The Power of Brands, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2008.

  5. Harsono Adisumarto, Hak Milik Intelektual Khususnya Paten dan Merek, Hak Milik Perindustrian (Industri Property),Akademia Pressindo, Jakarta, 1990. 

  6. Hillary E. Pearson & Clifford G. Miller, “Commercial Exploitation of International Property”, Blackstone Press Limited, London, 1990.

  7. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual, Modul Kekayaan Intelektual Tingkat Dasar Bidang Hak Cipta, Jakarta, 2020. 

  8. Khoirul Hidayah, Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Cetakan Kedua, Setara Press, Jakarta, 2017.

  9. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Kedua, Kencana Prenada, Jakarta, 2010.

  10. Philip Kotler & Gary Amstrong, Principles of Marketing, 14th Edition, Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey, 2012.

  11. Ranti Fauza Mayana & Tisni Santika, Hukum Merek Perkembangan Aktual Perlindungan Merek dalam Konteks Ekonomi Kreatif di Era Disrupsi Digital, Cetakan Pertama, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2021.

  12. Sudaryat, Sudjana, Rika Ratna Permata, “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Memahami Prinsip Dasar, Cakupan, dan Undang-Undang yang Berlaku”, Oase Media, Bandung, 2010.

  13. Andre Asmara, Studi Kasus Penerapan Prinsip Pendaftaran First to File pada Pembatalan Merek Cap Mawar (Putusan Mari Nomor : 512K.Pdt.Sus.HKI/2016)”, Jurnal Hukum Syiah Kuala, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2019.

  14. Gary I Lilienthal, “The Development of the Tort of Passing Off”, Disertasi Doktoral, University of Curtin, 2012.

  15. Marwah M. Diah, “Prinsip dan Bentuk-bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan”, Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, Vol 5, No. 2, 2008.

  16. Nevey Variadi Ariadi, “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Luar Pengadilan”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Vol 1, No. 2, 2012.

  17. Nur Hidayati, Perlindungan Hukum pada Merek yang Terdaftar, Ragam Jurnal Pengembangan Humaniora, Vol. 11 No. 3 Desember 2011, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, 2011.

  18. Rahmi Yuniarti, Efisiensi Pemilihan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waralaba”, Fiat Justitia Journal of Law, Vol. 10, Issue 3, 2016.

  19. Rick Syekh Alif Saputra, Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Hubungan Fungsionil Antara Penyidik dan Penuntut Umum dalam Delik Aduan, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, No. 5 Vol. 1, 2013.

  20. Syahriyah Semaun, Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Merek Perdagangan Barang dan Jasa, Jurnal Hukum Diktum, No. 1 Vol.14, 2016.

  21. Tundjung & Rani Noviyanti, Revolusi Industri dan Pengaruhnya pada Penelitian Sejarah”, Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, No. 2 Vol. 4, 2021.

  22. Yuniar Kurniawaty, Alternative Dispute Resolution On Intellectual Property Dispute”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 14 No. 02, 2017.

  23. Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 1961 tentang Merek.

  24. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.

  25. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis.

  26. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2012 tentang Penetapan Sementara.

  27. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.

  28. Putusan Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.NiagaSby.

  29. Andi Saputra, “Mengenal Asas First to File yang Membuat Pierre Cardin Jatuh ke Orang Jakarta”,https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3295968/mengenal-asas-first-to-file-yang-membuat-pierre-cardin-jatuh-ke-orang-jakarta, diakses pada tanggal 9 November 2022, pkl. 16.50 WIB.

  30. https://pstoreglow.co.id/tentang, diakses pada tanggal tanggal 10 November 2022, pkl 09.45 WIB.

  31. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20220325075903-17-325876/heboh-penjualan-ms-glow-rp-600-m-sebulan-mbto-mrat-lewat, diakses pada 10 November 2022, pkl 10.00 WIB.

  32. Risa Amrikasari, “Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Kekayaan Intelektual”, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5cd500ea71f99/mekanisme-penyelesaian-sengketa-kekayaan-intelektual/ , diakses pada tanggal 9 November 2022, pkl 19.39 WIB.

  33. World Economic Forum, “The Future of Jobs Report 2018”, terdapat dalam https://www.weforum.org/reports/reader-the-future-of-jobs-report-2018/in-full, diakses tanggal 1 November 2022, pkl 17.52.