Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 29, 2019
Accepted
July 8, 2019
Published
July 9, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 437 Download : 921

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the effectiveness in project-based learning of waste cooking oil recycling to improving students’ high order thinking skills. The research design used was the The Matching-Only Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. The population in this research was all of students in grade XI MIA one of Senior High School in Bandarlampung. The sample of the research was the students of class XI MIA 4 and XI MIA 6. The data analysis technique used was non parametric statistic test using Mann Whitney U to postestt value. The results of this study it can be seen from postest value. Postest value in the experiment class that is greater than the postest value in the control class as well as the <g> on the medium categorized in the experimental class and in the low control class indicate that project-based learning of waste cooking oil recycling can improve students' high order thinking skills.

 

Keywords: high order thinking skills, waste cooking oil, project-based learning

                                                               

Article Details

License

Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the simultaneously licenced under A Creative Commons Attribution (CC-By-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the worsk's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Sarif, Y., Fadiawati, N., & Syamsuri, M. M. F. (2019). The Effectiveness Of Waste Cooking Oil Recycling Project-Based Learning To Improve Students’ High Order Thingking Skills. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 3(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol3.iss1.art5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. A. Benesova & J. Tupa, Requirments for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0. 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent manufacturing, FAIM2017. (Pilsen, Czech Republic, 2017), pp. 2195-2202.
  2. A. Riadi, JPM, 2, 3, pp. 1-6, (2016).
  3. A,Y. Sari, “Pengaruh Model Ill-Structured Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis” Bachelor, Thesis. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, 2018.
  4. B. Trilling, & C. Fabel, 21st century skills. Learning for life in our times (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2009).
  5. C. Diawati., et al, ACSP, 95,3, pp. 468-475, (2017).
  6. C. Fadhila. A. D. Corebima., & Balqis. Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMAN 7 Malang. Bachelor, Thesis, Universitas Negeri Malang. (2013).
  7. C. Trihendradi, Step by Step SPSS 17.0 Analisis Data Statistik, (Andi Offset, Yogyakarta, 2005).
  8. D. Billings & K. Kowalski (2005). JBPDK, 36, 6, pp. 244-245, (2005).
  9. E. Desnylasari, S. Mulyani, M. Bakti, JPK, 5, 1, pp. 134-142, (2016).
  10. E. Rofiah, N. S. Aminah, & E. Y. Ekawati, JPF, 1, 2, pp. 17-21, (2013).
  11. E.Y. Wijaya, D.A. Sudjimat, & A. Nyoto, PNME, 1, 1, pp. 263-278, (2016).
  12. H. Fitri, H., I.W Dasna., Suharjo, JRK, 3, 2, pp. 201-205, (2018).
  13. H. N. Dinni, PPSNM, 1, pp. 170-176, (2018).
  14. H. Rahayu, J. Purwanto & D. Hasanah, JIPF, 4,1, pp. 56-60, (2017).
  15. I.K. Sudarsana, JPM, 1, 1, pp. 1-5, (2016).
  16. Jimin. “Pengelolaan Program Kerja Komite Sekolah Dasar Negeri Sibela Timur Jebres di Surakarta Tahun 2016,” Ph.D. tesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2017.
  17. J. R Fraenkel & N. E Wallen, How To Design and Evaluate Research In Education Eighth Edition. (The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, 2006), pp. 277-278.
  18. K. Dian, JPEP, 20, 2, pp. 142-155. (2016).
  19. K. Osman, L. C. Hiong & R. Vebrianto, PSBS, 102, pp. 188-194, (2013).
  20. K.S. Sitaresmi, S. Saputro, S.B. Utomo, JPK, 6, 1, pp. 54-61, (2017).
  21. L. D. Noma, B. A. Prayitno & Suwarno, JB, 9, 2, pp. 62-66, (2016).
  22. L. Nuryanti, S. Zubaidah & M. Diantoro, JP, 3, 2, pp.155-158, (2017).
  23. L. W Anderson & D.R Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (New York : Longman, 2001).
  24. Marwan & M. Ikhsan, JDM, 3,2, pp. 9-18, (2013).
  25. Mukminan, Seminar nasional teknologi pendidikan (Unnesa, Semarang, Indonesia, 2017).
  26. N. Fadiawati & M. M. F. Syamsuri. Merancang Pembelajaran Kimia di Sekolah (Yogyakarta, Media Akademi, 2018), pp. 108-109.
  27. N.M. Suranti, Gunawan, & H. Sahidu, JPFT, 2, 2, pp. 73-79, (2016).
  28. R.A. Rose, A.T. Prasetya JIPK, 8, 2, pp. 1360-1369, (2014).
  29. R. Hartono., A.P Listiadi., I. M. Bayupramana. JTPL, 16,1, pp. 33-38, (2013).
  30. R. R. Hake. AJP, 66, 1, pp. 64-74. (1998)
  31. S. Mihardi, M. B. Harahap, R. A Sani JEP, 4, 25, pp. 33-39, (2013).
  32. S. Zubaidah, Keterampilan Abad Ke-21: Keterampilan yang Diajarkan Melalui Pembelajaran STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintanga Kaliamantan Barat. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dengan tema "isu-isu Strategis Pembelajaran MIPA Abad 21. Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang. Kalimantan Barat, 10 December 2016.
  33. T. Yoshikawa, & Y. Naito, JMAJ, 45, pp. 271-276, (2002).
  34. V. Bergh, D. Mortelmans, P. Spooren, D. Gijbels & G. Vanthournout. SEE, 32, pp. 345-368.
  35. Yulita, Fadiawati dan Diawati. JPPK, 7, 2, pp. 3-5, (2018).
  36. Y. Cakici & N. Turkmen. TOJST, 7,4, pp. 17-19. (2013).