Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 5, 2019
Accepted
July 9, 2019
Published
July 9, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 644 Download : 543

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the significant differences of  learning achievement at 10th grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Kalasan between the application of conventional learning models with learning models Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, Transferring (REACT) in the domain of knowledge, attitudes, and skill  on the Basic Chemical Law materials. This study also aimed to know students’ response to learning using REACT model. This research was an experimental using Quasi Experimental Design, namely Posttest Only with Nonequivalent Groups Design. The population in this study was all students of 10th grade SMA 1 Kalasan in the academic year 2017/2018. This study used two classes as the study sample. The data were analyzed using Independent Samples T-Test parametric test for the knowledge and attitude domain, and Mann Whitney U non parametric test for the skill domain. The results of this study can be concluded that (1) there was  no significant difference in student learning achievement in the  knowledge domain, (2) there was  no significant difference in student learning achievement in the attitude domain, and (3) there was  significant differences in student learning achievement in the skill domain  between the application of conventional learning models with REACT learning models in the  Chemical Basic Law and (4) students gave a good response to the REACT learning model performed. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Cahyaningrum, R., & Febriana, B. W. (2019). Implementation of Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, Transferring (REACT) Model to Students Learning Achievement in Chemical Basic Law Material at 10th Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Kalasan. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 3(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol3.iss1.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Prayitno, Pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling (SLTP), (Bina Sumber Daya MIPA, Jakarta, 1997).
  2. Suyono and Hariyanto, Belajar dan Pembelajaran, (Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung, 2011).
  3. M.L. Crawford, Teaching Contextually, (CCI Publishing, Texas, 2001).
  4. E. Ultay, EEST Part B Social and Educational Studies. 4, 1, 233-240 (2012).
  5. Susanto, E. Susilowati, and Haryono, JPK. 1, 1, 67-73 (2012).
  6. D. Apriyanto, S. Mulyani and E. Susanti, JPK, 3, 3, 1-10 (2014).
  7. R.R.T. Wasonowati, T. Redjeki and S.R.D. Ariani, JPK., 3, 3, 66-75 (2014).
  8. A. Navarra, Achieving Pedagogical Equity in The Classroom, (Cord International, Texas, 2006).
  9. O. Fakhruriza and I. Kartika, JRKPF, 2, 2, 54-57 (2015).
  10. D. P. Ausubel, The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View, (Springer Science Business Media, New York, 2000).
  11. A. Budiningnish, Belajar dan Pembelajaran, (Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2012).
  12. Djaali, Psikologi Pendidikan, (Bumi Aksara, Jakarta, 2011).
  13. Depdiknas, Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, (Depdiknas, Jakarta, 2008).
  14. N.M. Meita, Lensa, 6, 1, 15-28 (2016).
  15. A. Farid, “Pengaruh penerapan strategi REACT terhadap hasil belajar kimia siswa kelas XI MAN Babakan Lebaksiu Tegal,” Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2013.