Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 2, 2020
Accepted
July 12, 2020
Published
August 25, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2703 Download : 7335

Main Article Content

Abstract

The legal issue that is raised and examined in this article is the concern that has recently emerged behind the development of (international) economic law. As if the (international) economic law would threaten the sovereignty of countries. This type of research is normative legal research. The results of the research and discussion conclude that the anxiety over such (international) economic law developments is excessive. Even though it is necessary to make efforts as a sign of caution. It is proven that in (international) economic law does not override national law. The theory of dignified as a pure legal theory becomes a tool kit to describe at a glance the “face” of (international) economic law that should not be worried about. Each sovereign state must give consent before the rules and legal principles are applied and enforced within and among the countries that are binding themselves in a form of international agreement. It is at this stage of the approval that the filter with legal values in the soul of the nation (Volksgeist) that safeguards the sovereignty of a nation and state can be used to select (international) economic law.

Keywords

Economic law theory of dignified justice Pancasila

Article Details

How to Cite
Kameo, J., & Prasetyo, T. (2020). Hakikat Hukum Ekonomi (Internasional) Dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(2), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Breitenmoser, Stephan, et. al (eds), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber, Zürich/Baden-Baden, Dike, 2007.
  3. Crombez, Christophe, The Democratic Devisit in European Union: Much Ado About Nothing?, European Union Politics, 2003.
  4. Dirjosisworo, Soedjono, Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Perdagangan Internasional (Perdagangan Multilateral) Versi Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia (World Trade Organization/WTO), Utomo, Bandung, 2004.
  5. Goode, Roy, Commercial Law, New Edition, Penguin Books, England, 1995.
  6. Jackson, John H., Sovereignty, the WTO and Changing Fundamentals of International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  7. Kadar, Abby, Ken Houle & Geoffrey Whitehead, Business Law, 4th Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford, 1996.
  8. L. C., Cavendish, Constitutional Law, Reprinted, Cavendish Publishing Ltd., 1998.
  9. Orucu, Esin, The Enigma of Comparative Law: Variations on a Theme for the Twenty-First Century, First Printed, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, the Netherlands, 2004.
  10. Peters, Anne, The Globalization of State Constitutions, in Jane Nijman and Andre Nollkaemper, New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.
  11. Prasetyo, Teguh dan Abdul Halim Barkatullah, Filsafat, Teori, & Ilmu Hukum: Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat, Cetakan I, RajaGrafindo Persada, Depok, 2012.
  12. Prasetyo, Teguh, Keadilan Bermartabat: Perspektif Teori Hukum, Cetakan Pertama, Nusamedia, Bandung, 2015.
  13. ______, Pembaharuan Hukum: Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, Cetakan Pertama, Setara Press, Malang, 2017.
  14. ______, Penelitian Hukum: Suatu Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, Cetakan ke-1, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2019.
  15. Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Revised Edition), Harvard University Press, USA, 1999.
  16. Jurnal
  17. Davey, William J., The WTO Dispute Settlement System: The First Ten Years, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol., 8, 2005.
  18. Elsig, Manfred, The World Trade Organization’s Legitimacy Crisis: What Does the Beast Look Like?, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 41, 2007.
  19. Esty. Daniel, The World Trade Organization’s Legitimacy Crisis, World Trade Review, Vol. 1, 2002;
  20. I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, et. al., The Application of Article 359 of the Criminal Code in the Investigation of the Death of Post-Operative Patients, Asers Publishing, September, 2017,Vol VIII, Issue 5, 2017.
  21. Krajewski, Markus, Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Perspective of WTO Law, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 35, 2001.
  22. Stein. Eric, International Integration and Democracy: No Love at First Sight, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 3, 2001.
  23. Teguh Prasetyo and Tri Astuti Handayani, Legal Aid Principle: (Dignified Justice Theory Perspective), International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), Vol.1, 2016.
  24. Teguh Prasetyo, Pancasila the Ultimate of All the Sources of Laws (A Dignified Justice Perspective), Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE), Vol. 54, 2016.
  25. ______, Criminal Liability of Doctor in Indonesia (From A Dignified Justice Perspective), International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 1(10);
  26. Shallman, TeguhPrasetyo and Amin Purnawan, Public Service on Land Registration Based on the Dignified Justice, Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), Int. J. Adv. Res. Vol. 5, 2016.
  27. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  28. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1994 tentang Pengesahan Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (Persetujuan Pembentukan Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia).
  29. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2000 tentang Perjanjian Internasional.