Article Sidebar
Download
Statistic
Read Counter :
404
Download : 1675
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the practical aspect, legal enforcement in Indonesia is still facing a controversy in terms of how a just verdict should be. The said controversy rooted deeply in the differences in the understanding towards the concept of normative law and the concept of progressive law. In the fact, most of legal apparatuses are still confined in normative law as a parameter of the verdicts that they conclude. On the other hand, from progressive law point of view, the existing legal norms are considered for not being a true reflection of the idea of justice. Consequently, the people then rely their hope for justice on the ability of lawyers to afford it
Article Details
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
Jamil, A. (2009). Cara Berhukum yang Benar Bagi Profesional Hukum (Ijtihad Sebagai Terobosan Hukum Progresif). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss1.art1
