Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 17, 2022
Accepted
May 31, 2022
Published
May 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 427 Download : 270

Main Article Content

Abstract




Pre-service teachers’ (PST) learning engagement in online learning as the contributing factor in determining students’ successful learning was less elaborated. It is important to explore the process of having meaningful learning engagement experiences. This study aims at elaborating on how learning engagement and meaning making, as experienced by two pre-service teachers, inspired them to successfully teach online in a variety of student contexts with the tools provided. The participants of this study were two pre-service teachers who participated in teaching internships as a mandatory program from their university. The type of this study was qualitative and was then analyzed by narrative analysis. Through multiple interviews and three months of Instagram stories, this study found two pre-service teachers employed learning engagement, especially cognitive engagement, in their distance learning process. The finding was elaborated into two themes; (1) cognitive engagement as a meaningful experience and (2) shared responsibility to achieve behavioral engagement.




Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Intan Pradita, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Bahasa Inggris

How to Cite
Al Mubarokah, L. ., & Pradita, I. (2022). The Experiences of Learning Engagement by Successful Pre-service Teachers during Teaching Internship Program. Journal of English and Education (JEE), 8(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v8i1.23773
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Barkhuizen, G., & Wette, R. (2008). Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System, 36(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.002
  2. Boyan, N. J. (1965). The Intern Team as a Vehicle for Teacher Education1. Journal of Teacher Education, 16(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248716501600105
  3. Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach (Rev. ed). State University of New York Press.
  4. Brown, A. L., Myers, J., & Collins, D. (2021). How pre-service teachers’ sense of teaching efficacy and preparedness to teach impact performance during student teaching. Educational Studies, 47(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1651696
  5. Carson, L., & Fisher, K. (2006). Raising the Bar on Criticality: Students’ Critical Reflection in an Internship Program. Journal of Management Education, 30(5), 700–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562905284962
  6. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2004). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Cohen, E., Hoz, R., & Kaplan, H. (2013). The practicum in preservice teacher education: A review of empirical studies. Teaching Education, 24(4), 345–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.711815
  8. Dewar, T., & Whittington, D. (2000). Online Learners and Their Learning Strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.2190/MUHM- WP90-42D5-6XWM
  9. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  10. Furlong, C. (2012). The teacher I wish to be: Exploring the influence of life histories on student teacher idealised identities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.678486
  11. Gebhard, J. (2009). The TESOL Practium. In A. Burns & J. C. Richard (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education (pp. 250–258). Cambridge University Press.
  12. Griffiths, C. (2015). What have we learnt from ‘good language learners’? ELT Journal, 69(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv040
  13. Hapsari, B. S., & Ena, O. T. (2019). ENGLISH PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS' IDENTITY DURING TEACHING PRACTICE: NARRATIVE RESEARCH. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 3(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v3i1.1708
  14. Ignelzi, M. (2000). Meaning-Making in the Learning and Teaching Process. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000(82), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.8201
  15. Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Harvard Univ. Pr.
  16. Kuh, G. D. (2003). What We’re Learning About Student Engagement From NSSE: Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24– 32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604090
  17. Maharsi, I. (2019). Pre-Service Teachers’ Reflective Practices through Teaching Practicum E- portfolios. Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies - ICETT 2019, 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/3337682.3337706
  18. Naiman, N. (1978). The Good Language Learner. Research in Education.
  19. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching, 44(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000492
  20. Pennington, M. C., & Richards, J. C. (2016). Teacher Identity in Language Teaching: Integrating Personal, Contextual, and Professional Factors. RELC Journal, 47(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631219
  21. Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New Benchmarks in Higher Education: Student Engagement in Online Learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
  22. Sun, J. C.-Y., Yu, S.-J., & Chao, C.-H. (2019). Effects of intelligent feedback on online learners’ engagement and cognitive load: The case of research ethics education. Educational Psychology, 39(10), 1293–1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1527291
  23. Theelen, H., Willems, M. C., van den Beemt, A., Conijn, R., & den Brok, P. (2020). Virtual internships in blended environments to prepare preservice teachers for the professional teaching context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12760
  24. Tindowen, D. J., Bangi, J., & Parallag, C. Jr. (2019). Pre-Service Teachers’ Evaluation on their Student Internship Program. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(10), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.10.18
  25. Tsang, W. K. (2003). Journaling From Internship to Practice Teaching. Reflective Practice, 4(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940308269
  26. Zhang, Z. (Victor). (2020). Learner engagement and language learning: A narrative inquiry of a successful language learner. The Language Learning Journal, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786712
  27. Zittoun, T., & Brinkmann, S. (2012). Learning as Meaning Making. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1809–1811). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1851