Main Article Content
Abstract
The existence of death penalty as a criminal sanction always raises controvertial. Using a comparative study method, this study concludes that : firstly, the existence of death penalty in the draft of Indonesian Criminal Code is to protect the society and to protect the right to live which becomes non-derogable righs. It was designed for specific crime , and it is implemented selectively; secondly, the prohibition of execution before the publict has to be changed and to be reviewed. This mechanism will create an obtacle to achieve the objective of this sanction
Article Details
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
Kholiq, M. A. (2009). Kontroversi Hukuman Mati dan Kebijakan Regulasinya dalam RUU KUHP (Studi Komparatif Menurut Hukum Islam). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol14.iss2.art1