Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 17, 2016
Published
October 17, 2016
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 4514 Download : 5558

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines: first, the tendencies in the type and weight of crime in the judge's decision in the criminal case of violence against women. Second, the application of the theory of criminal prosecution. This is a normative-legal research with the legal materials that were analyzed using a descriptive-qualitative analysis. From the results of research and discussion conducted, it can be concluded, first: judges always choose to impose the type of imprisonment. The trend for choosing such type was caused by two factors, namely the pattern of criminal threatening in legislation and the nature of crimes of violence against women that substantively is relatively serious. Meanwhile, regarding the weight of sentence imposed, the judge's decisions tend to be various but on average are quite heavy, that is the punishment of 3 (three) to 4 (four) years in jail. Such tendency showed the alignment towards women as the victims of violence crime. The second conclusion showed that the most dominant theories used are the theory of retribution. With the use of this theory it means that judges tend to pay attention to the interests of women as victims.

Keywords

Crimes of violence against women the types of crime criminal weights the purpose of punishment

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Kholiq, M. A., & Wibowo, A. (2016). Penerapan Teori Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan: Studi Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Daftar Pustaka
  2. Anwar, Yesmil dan Adang, Pembaruan Hukum Pidana; Reformasi Pidana, PT Gramedia Widia Sarana Indonesia, Jakarta, 2008.
  3. Atmasasmita, Romli, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 1995.
  4. Elmina Martha, Aroma, Perempuan Kekerasan dan Hukum, Dahlan, Yogyakarta, 2003.
  5. Kadir Muhammad, Abdul, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004.
  6. M. Misiaveg, Elizabeth, “Important Steps and Instructive Models in The Fight to Eliminate Violence Against Womenâ€, Washington and Lee Law Review. 1995.
  7. Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1992.
  8. Mulyadi, Lilik, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, dan Viktimologi, Penerbit Djambatan, Jakarta, 2007.
  9. Nawawi Arief, Barda, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2003.
  10. Remmelink, Jan, Hukum Pidana, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2004.
  11. Sudiarti Luhulima, Achie (ed.), Pemahaman Bentuk-Bentuk Tindak Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan dan Alternatif Pemecahannya, Kelompok Kerja Convention Watch dan Pusat Kajian Wanita dan Jender UI, Jakarta, 2000.
  12. Sholehudiin, Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana, Cet. Kedua, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003.
  13. Widodo, Sistem Pemidanaan dalam Cyber Crime, Laksbang Mediatama, Yogyakarta, 2009.