Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 13, 2021
Accepted
March 21, 2022
Published
April 5, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 3329 Download : 2291

Main Article Content

Abstract

Chemical equilibria, including acid-base equilibria, play a significant role in the learning of general chemistry. Acid-base reactions as well as acidity and basicity concepts and their relationship to titrations are an important part of any general chemistry course, and students have difficulties understanding these concepts.  The purpose of this research project is to examine some of the challenges and alternative conceptions that students face in learning about acid-base titrations. A Likert-type survey with open-ended questions were used to assess the understanding of 110 participants. The investigation took place at a public, urban, and minority-serving institute. Our data suggest that students struggle with learning about acid-base titration problems and concepts. They rely on algorithmic problem solving, rote- learning, plugging into equations, and calculator use when approaching acid-base titration problems instead of developing their conceptual understanding and meaningful learning of the concepts. Additionally, our data support the notion that development of conceptual understanding of acid-base titration is important for students’ learning. Furthermore, our research data suggest that students have difficulties with understanding and visualizing what is taking place at the microscopic level during acid-base titration reactions. Instructors should consider teaching strategies that include leaning about and interrelating the symbolic, macroscopic, and microscopic levels of representations which can promote learning and deeper understanding of abstract chemical concepts. We recommend that instructors explicitly address and relate the three levels of representation in their teaching of chemistry concepts.


Keywords: chemistry education research, acid-base titration, challenges

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Chemistry Education Research

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the simultaneously licenced under A Creative Commons Attribution (CC-By-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the worsk's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Author Biographies

Issa I. Salame, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The City College of New York of the City University of New York

Assistant Professor

The Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Adrianny Montero, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The City College of New York of the City University of New York

Chemistry and Biochemistry Department

Dani Eschweiler, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The City College of New York of the City University of New York

Chemistry and Biochemistry Department

How to Cite
Salame, I. I., Montero, A., & Eschweiler, D. (2022). Examining some of the Students’ Challenges and Alternative Conceptions in Learning about Acid-base Titrations. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol6.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. M. Drechsler, and J. Van Driel, Res. Sci. Educ. 38(5), 611-631 (2008).
  2. M. M. Cooper, H. Kouyoumdjian, and S. M. Underwood, J. Chem. Educ. 93(10), 1703-1712 (2016).
  3. H. Özmen, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 9, 225-233 (2008).
  4. A. Heck, E. Kedzierska, L. Rogers, and M. Chmurska, Chem. Educat. 14(4), 164-174 (2008).
  5. A. J. Idhle, “The Development of Modern Chemistry.” Dover Publications Inc. (1984).
  6. M. S. Lesney, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 4, 47-48 (2003).
  7. D. Cheung, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 10, 97-108 (2009).
  8. D. P. Cartrette, and P. M. Mayo, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 12, 29-39 (2011).
  9. D. Gonzalez-Gomez, D. Airado-Rodriguez, and F. Canada-Canada, J. Chem. Educ. 92, 855-863 (2015).
  10. D. A. Skoog, D. M. West, F. J. Holler, and S. R. Crouch, S.R. Fundamental of Analytical Chemistry (9th ed., pp. 302-303). United States of America: Mary Finch (2014).
  11. A. Kraft, J. Chem. Educ. 80 (5), 554 (2003).
  12. H. R. Widarti, A. Permanasari, and S. Mulyani, Int. J. Educ. 9(2), 105-112 (2017).
  13. K. Sheppard, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 7(1), 32-45 (2006).
  14. C. M. Dobson, and N. S. Winter, World J. Chem. Educ. 2(4), 59-61 (2014).
  15. D. C. Harris, J. Chem. Educ. 85 (4), 498 (2008).
  16. M. Drechsler, and H. J. Schmidt, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 6(1), 19-35 (2005).
  17. H. J. Schmidt, and D. Volke, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25(11), 1409-1424 (2003).
  18. B. M. Hand, and D. F. Treagust, Res. Sci. Educ. 18(1), 53-63 (1988).
  19. J. Lin, M. Chiu, and J. Liang, Exploring Mental Models and Causes of Students’ Misconceptions in Acids and Bases. Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) Annual Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada, and April 1−3 (2004).
  20. U. Zoller, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 27(10), 1053-1065 (1990).
  21. M. A. Predrosa, and M. H. Dias, M.H. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Europe, 1(2), 227-236 (2000).
  22. E. Cook, E. Kennedy, and S. Y. McGuire, J. Chem. Educ. 90, 961-967 (2013).
  23. M. D. Mosimege, S. Afr. J. Chem. 51 (3), 137-145 (1998).
  24. M. L. Calatayud, S. L. Barcenas, and C. Furio-Mas, C. J. Chem. Educ. 84, 1717-1724 (2007).
  25. M. Kousathana, M. Demerouti, and G. Tsaparlis, Sci. Educ. 14 (2), 173-193 (2005).
  26. B. M. Hand, and D. F. Treagust, Sch. Sci. Math. 91, 172-176 (1991).
  27. M. Demerouti, M. Kousathana, and G. Tsaparlis, Chem. Educat. 9 (2), 122-137 (2004).
  28. D. J. Watters, and J. J. Watters, Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 34, 278-284 (2006).
  29. H. J. Schmidt, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 17(6), 733-741 (1995).
  30. R. K. Coll, and N. Taylor, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 3, 175-184 (2002).
  31. I. I. Salame, S. Patel, and S. Suleman, Int. J. Chem. Educ. Res. 3(1), 6-14 (2019).
  32. G. Sendur, O. Ozbayrak, and M. Uyulgan, Sci. Direct, 3, 52-56 (2011).
  33. S. -H. Paik, J. Chem. Educ. 92 (9), 1484-1489 (2015).
  34. L. Fishel, J. Chem. Educ. 87(11), 1183-1185 (2010).
  35. H. Z. Muchtar, J. Educ. Prac. 15, 65-74 (2012).
  36. K. Bain, A. Moon, M. R. Mack, and M. H. Towns, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 15 (3), 320-335 (2014).
  37. N. D. Novak, J. Chem. Educ. 61, 607-612 (1984).
  38. A. H. Johnstone, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. Europe, 1(1), 9-15 (2000).
  39. D. Treagust, G. Chittleborough, and T. Mamiala, Int. J. Sc. Educ. 25(11), 1353-1368 (2003).
  40. M. Pikoli, Int. J. Act. Learn. 5(1), 1-10 (2020).
  41. J. W. Lin, and M. H. Chiu, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 29(6), 771-803 (2007).
  42. A. Hilton, and K. Nichols, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 33(16), 2215-2246 (2011).
  43. M. M. Cooper, S. Sandi-Urena, and R. Stevens, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 18-24 (2008).