Main Article Content
Abstract
In issuing the court in Indonesia, the independence of the court is often interfered by power interest with many various background. Today, after the act No. 4, 2004 on the Judicial Affairs and the act No.5, 2004 on The Supreme Court issued, the effort of interference are probably not repeated. It is caused that judicature institution both in organization, administration and financial are not directedbyDepartment of Administration, but it applies the one roofpolicy underthe Supreme Court. The significant change paradigmatically would strengthen the autonomy, transparence, and responsibility for every judge in deciding the case in the level of any judicature (Human RightsJudicature,
Trade Judicature, Convptiori Judicature and the Commission of Consumers ConflictSolution).
Trade Judicature, Convptiori Judicature and the Commission of Consumers ConflictSolution).
Keywords
Judicial Affairs
judge
Article Details
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
alkostar, artidjo. (2016). Fenomena-Fenomena Paradigmatik Dunia Pengadilan di Indonesia (Telaah Kritis terhadap Putusan Sengketa Konsumen). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 11(26), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss26.art1