Plagiarism Policy

Jurnal Sains & Teknologi Lingkungan (JSTL) strictly prohibits plagiarism in any form and upholds high standards of academic integrity in accordance with the COPE Best Practice Guidelines.

All submitted manuscripts must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere. Any use of ideas, data, or words from other sources must be properly cited.

All manuscripts are screened using recognized plagiarism detection software. JSTL applies a maximum similarity index of 15%, excluding references, quotations, and commonly used phrases.

If plagiarism is identified:

Manuscripts with minor plagiarism will be returned to authors for revision.
Manuscripts with a similarity index exceeding 15% must be revised; failure to meet the threshold after revision will result in rejection.
Manuscripts involving major plagiarism, duplicate publication, or self-plagiarism will be rejected.
If plagiarism is discovered after publication, JSTL may issue a correction or retraction in accordance with COPE guidelines.

Authors are fully responsible for the content of their submissions.

Accredited

HomepageSlideParallax

Focus and Scope :

Jurnal Sains & Teknologi Lingkungan (JSTL) published twice a year in January and June is a scientific journal that publishes scientific research papers and ideas in the field of science and technology related to environmental issues. The journal covers typical subjects of environmental sciences and technologies such as.: Drinking water treatment, wastewater treatment, solid waste treatment, solid waste management, cleaner production, air pollution management, resource recovery, water pollution, soil contamination, and other relevant fields. JSTL published by Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII) only accepts original scientific works that have not been published by other medias. All incoming articles will be reviewed in advance by competent reviewers before being eligible for publication.

Peer Review Process

An article submitted to the journal will undergo an anonymous peer review process, in which the reviewers’ identities are concealed from the authors. Each manuscript is reviewed by two independent experts in the relevant field of study. The review process typically takes approximately 8 weeks. If both reviewers recommend acceptance, the Editor-in-Chief will proceed with publication after the required revisions are completed. In cases where the reviewers’ recommendations differ, the final decision regarding publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief.