Main Article Content

Abstract

o overcome the barriers in the dispute settlement in court, the Supreme Court issued a new mechanism for the settlement of civil cases, called as simple civil claims. The procedure mechanism was introduced through the issuance of PERMA No. 2 of 2015 concerning Simple Civil Claim. The researcher in this study intended to observe the implementation of the PERMA of Simple Civil Claim in Yogyakarta DistrictCourt, along with the obstacles. The study was conducted using the empirical juridical research methodand  analytical  descriptive  data  analysis.  From  the research  results,  it  can  be  concluded  that  the implementation of PERMA No. 2 of 2015 concerning Simple Civil Claim in Yogyakarta District Court is still ineffective in practice. This has been determined by various factors such as the rule of law, legal officers, facilities and infrastructure and community. The researcher also found a number of obstaclesfaced in implementing PERMA, some of which were related to the existence of options to choose the procedure  mechanism,  tight  case  qualifications  that  could  be  submitted  through  simple  program procedures and lack of PERMA socialization.

Keywords

Simple civil claim barriers regulation of supreme court dispute settlement procedure mechanism

Article Details

How to Cite
Sutiyoso, B., Dewi, A. A., & Isnawan, F. (2019). Implementasi PERMA No. 2 Tahun 2015 di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 26(1), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art9

References

  1. Buku
  2. Harahap, M. Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata, Sinar Grafika, Yogyakarta, 2005.
  3. Islamy, M. Irfan, Prinsip-Prinsip Perumusan Kebijaksanaan Negara, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta, 2014.
  4. Keban, Yeremias T., Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik: Konsep, Teori Dan Isu, Gava Media, Yogyakarta, 2004.
  5. Mertoksumo, Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2014.
  6. Nurcholis, Hanif, Teori dan Praktik Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah, Penerbit Grasindo, Jakarta, 2005.
  7. Rimdan, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi, Kencana, Jakarta, 2012.
  8. Suparman, Erman, Arbitase dan Dilema Penegakan Keadilan, Fikahati Aneska dan BANI Arbitration Centre, Jakarta, 2012.
  9. Wahab, Solichin Abdul, Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Press, Malang, 2008.
  10. Jurnal
  11. Rakhmawati, Oktaria dan Pudji Astuti, “Implementasi PERMA No. 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Dan Jumlah Denda Dalam KUHP Di Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya”, Novum, Volume 01, No.1, Tahun 2013.
  12. Sukolegowo, Pramono, Efektivitas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, Dan Biaya Ringan Di Lingkungan Peradilan Umum”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.8, No. 1 Januari 2008.
  13. Warwick, Donald P., “Integrating Planning and Implementation: A Transactional Approach, ” Development Discussion Paper No. 63 Cambridge Mass, Harvard Institute for International Development, June 1979.
  14. Internet
  15. Gugatan Sederhana Produk MA Diharapkan Dapat Membantu Pencari Keadilan”, www.suksesinews.com, diakses pada tanggal 13 September 2016.”
  16. Gugatan Sederhana Demi Peradilan yang Sederhana, Cepat dan Berbiaya Ringan”, www.pshk.or.id, , diakses pada tanggal 14 September 2016.
  17. “MA Harus Kaji Permasalahan Domisili Dalam PERMA Gugatan Sederhana”, www.kanalhukum.id, diakses pada tanggal 14 September 2016.
  18. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
  19. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia
  20. Het Herzien Indonesisch Reglement (HIR), Staatblad 1848 No. 16 jo. Staatblad 1941 No. 44
  21. Rechtsreglemen Buitengewesten (Rbg), Staatblad 1927 No. 227
  22. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
  23. UU No, 14 Tahun 1970 jo. UU No. 4 Tahun 2004 jo. UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
  24. PERMA No. 2 Tahun 2015 Gugatan Sederhana