Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 8, 2016
Published
June 8, 2016
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 628 Download : 2989

Main Article Content

Abstract

The regional autonomy should notbe interpreted as theseparation between regional and state authority extremely for the constitution has declared the unity stated clearly to maintain any public interest. In spreading outgoverning powerinto any levelsthe main position to hold the responsibility is laid down upon the govemment. it would be very necessary to classify the provincial rules in order to prevent court system from any distorsion. The government could dismiss any intemal provincial affairs while Supreme Courtcould do so in any public interest or criminal law.

Keywords

criminal law public interest autonomy

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
HR, R. (2016). Dimensi Hukum Pengawasan terhadap Penyelenggaraan Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 8(18), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol8.iss18.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aigemene Bepalingen van Administratief Recht (ABAR)." Rapport van de Commissie inzake Aigemene Bepalingen van Administratief
  2. Recht. Samsom H.D.. Tjeenk Willlnk. Alphen aan den Rijn. 1984.
  3. A.F.A. Korsten en F.P.C.L. Tonnaer. 1989. Lokale Regelgeving, in Lokale Bestuurin Nederland, W. Derksen en A.F.A. Korsten (redactie). Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom H.D. Tjeenk Willink.
  4. Bagir Manan. "Hubungan Antara Pusat dan Daerah Berdasarkan Asas Desentralisasi Menurut UUD 1945." Disertasi. Unpad.
  5. Bandung. 1990.
  6. , "Wewenang Propinsi, Kabupaten, dan Kota dalam Rangka Otonomi Daerah." Makalah pada Seminar Nasional Pengembangan Wilayab dan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam di Kawasan Pesisir. Bandung. 13 Mei 2000.
  7. . 1993. Perjalanan Historis Pasal 18 UUD 1945. Karawang: Unsika.
  8. . 1995. Sistem dan Teknik Pembuatan Peraturan Perundang- undangan Tingkat Daerah. Universitas Bandung: LPPM.
  9. C.J.N. Vversteden. 1984.Inleiding Algemeen Bestuursrecbt, Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom H.D. Tjeenk Willink.
  10. F.A.M. Stroink en J.G. Steenbeek. 1985. Inieiding inhetStaats-en Administratief Recht Tjeenk Willink. Aan den Rijn; Samsom H.D.
  11. F.P.C.L. Tonnaer. "Legaal Besturen; het Legaliteitsbeginsel." Toetssteen of Strulkelblok? Tulisan Dalam 1986.
  12. Besturen en Norm. Kluwer- Deventer: Bundel Opstellen Opgedragen aan R. Crince Le Roy.
  13. H.D. van Wijk/Willem Konijnenbelt. 1995. Hoofdstukken van Administratief Recht. Vuga, s'Gravenhage.
  14. Irawan Soedjito. 1983. Pengawasan terhadap Peraturan Daerah dan Keputusan Kepala Daerah. Jakarta: Bina Aksara. •
  15. J.B.J.M. ten Berge. 1996. Besturen door de Overheid. Deventer: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink.
  16. Moh. Mahfud. 1988. Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  17. N.E. Algra, et.al. 1983.Kamus Istilah Hukum
  18. Fockema Andreae. Binacipta. P. de Haan, et.al. 1986. Bestuursrecht in deSociale Rechtsstaat. Kluwer- Deventer: Dee! 2.
  19. P. Nicolai, et. al. 1994. Bestuursrecht. Amsterdam.
  20. R.J.H.M. Huisman. Algemeen Bestuursrecht. Amsterdam: Kobra.