Main Article Content

Abstract

The critical thinking on civil law procedure must be put on the frame and spectrum of comprehensive thinking, namely how is the role of judicative body on the more basic agenda, namely to give the contribution for civil conflict solution, to recover and distribute right and responsibility proporsionally. It also recovers the public balance, give law pro tection for individual through considering public right andinterest

Keywords

civil law procedure

Article Details

How to Cite
muqoddas, busyro. (2016). Mengkritisi Asas-asas Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 9(20), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss20.art2

References

  1. Aigra, N.E. dan Van Duyvendi]k.1983. Mula Hukum. Bandung: Binacipta.
  2. Basyir, Ahmad Azhar. 1993.MA: Refieksiatas Persoalan Keislaman. Bandung: Mizan.
  3. Fakih, Mansour. 1996. Masyarakat Sipil. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  4. Khadduri, Majid. 1999. Teotogi Keadilan; Perspektif Islam. Risalah Gusti. Kleden, Ignas. 1987. Sikap llmiah dan Kritik Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: LP3ES. .
  5. Koesnoe, MM. ^99S.Kedudukan dan Tugas Hakim Menurut Undang-undang Dasar 1945. Surabaya: Ubhara Press.
  6. Kusuma, Mulyana .W. 2001. Tegaknya„ Supremasi Hukum. Bandung:
  7. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  8. Lev, Daniel S.. 2001. Advokat Indonesia Mencari Legitimasi. Jakarta, PSHK dan The Asia Foundation.
  9. Lubis, Todung Mulya dalam makalah dengan judul "Peradilan Bebas dan Mandiri?"pada ulang tahun Indonesian
  10. Court Monitoring, di Yogyakarta. 30 Unger, Roberto. 1999. Gerakan Studi Hukum April 2002. Kr/fe. Jakarta; ELSHAM.1999.
  11. Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 1985. Wt/Aum Acara ' Kompas. 1/Oktober 1994. Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
  12. Qaradhawi, Yusuf Al. 1999. Flkih Tayslr. Surabaya: Pustaka Kautsar.