Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 4, 2017
Published
August 14, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1305 Download : 1162

Main Article Content

Abstract

Resolution of alleged tender conspiracy based on Law no. 5 of 1999 and Law no. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law no. 20 of 2001 has resulted in different decisions. This can be seen in the case of the conspiracies of the tender of the sales of two VLCC tankers Hull 1540 and 1541, Indomobil tender on May 30, 2002, procurement of legislative election ink in 2004, and electronic ID card in 2011 until 2012. This normative research analyzed the intercept between violating the existing laws in terms of criminal law and civil law, and the violation of laws both civil and criminal law in the case of tender conspiracy. The study concluded that, first, the shift in understanding about the unlawful nature (wederrechtelijk) occurs in criminal law, not only based on the criminal law (onwetmatige) but also involves the criteria of violating civil law (onrechmatige), which includes the violation of propriety in community. This is used in criminal law to interpret law violation in a material sense. Nevertheless, there are still different opinions among criminal law experts whether the nature of material law violation only has negative function or has positive function as well. Second, the violation of law that is generally defined in civil law and known in criminal law as a crime in material sense, can be limited by interpretation to determine forbidden acts known as schutznormtheorie or doctrine of relativity. Along with the understanding of law enforcement personnel and jurisprudence, it can be said that the barriers of law violation in criminal law and civil law have gone when the tender conspiracy case already violates the sense of justice in society.

Keywords

Law violation civil criminal tender conspiracy

Article Details

License
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author Biography

Siti Anisah, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Fakultas Hukum
How to Cite
Anisah, S., & Raharjo, T. (2018). Batasan Melawan Hukum dalam Perdata dan Pidana Pada Kasus Persekongkolan Tender. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.
  2. AM. Tri Anggraini, Pendekatan Per Se Ilegal dan Rule of Reason, Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2003.
  3. Barda Nawawi Arief, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kajian Perbandingan, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.
  4. Chairul Huda, Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, Jakarta: Kencana, 2006
  5. Christopher L. Sagers, Antitrust, Second Edition, USA, Wolters Kluwer Law&Business, 2014.
  6. D. Schaffmeister et. al., Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.
  7. Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2014.
  8. http://www.bpk.go.id/assets/files/attachments/2009/02/sp-vlcc.pdf, Akses 22 September 2017.
  9. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3567145/vonis-e-ktp-hakim-irman-sugiharto-terbukti-salahgunakan-wewenang, Akses 12 Oktober 2017.
  10. J. Satrio, Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan yang Lahir dari Undang-Undang, Bagian Pertama, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001.
  11. Jimly Asshiddiqie, Teori & Aliran Penafsiran Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta: Ind. Hill.Co., 1997.
  12. Jan Remmelink, Hukum Pidana:Komentar atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003.
  13. Knud Hansen et. al., Undang-Undang Larangan Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, Jakarta: Katalis, 2001.
  14. Munir Fuady. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Pendekatan Kontemporer), Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.
  15. news.detik.com/berita/570691/ada-2-penyimpangan-pengadaan-tinta-pemilu, “Ada 2 Penyipangan Pengadaan Tinta Pemilu,†Akses 5 Maret 2017.
  16. Peraturan KPPU No. 2 Tahun 2010 tentang Pedoman Pasal 22 Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Persekongkolan Tender.
  17. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Cet 2. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008
  18. Putusan KPPU No. 03/KPPU-I/2002 Tender Penjualan Saham PT Indomobil Sukses International.
  19. Putusan KPPU No. 07/KPPU-L/2004 Tender Penjualan Dua Unit Tanker Pertamina.
  20. Putusan KPPU No. 08/KPPU-L/2004 Tender Pengadaan Tinta Sidik Jari Pemilu Legislatif Tahun 2004.
  21. Putusan KPPU No. 03/KPPU-L/2012 Tender Penerapan Kartu Tanda Penduduk Berbasis NIK Secara Nasional (KTP Elektronik) Tahun 2011 s/d 2012.
  22. Putusan MA No. 275 K/Pid/1983 tanggal 29 Desember 1983.
  23. Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2477 K/Pid/1988 tanggal 23 Juli 1993.
  24. Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1571 K/Pid/1993 tanggal 18 Januari 1995.
  25. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 003/PUU-IV/2006 tanggal 25 Juli 2006.
  26. Roeslan Saleh, Sifat Melawan Hukum dari Perbuatan Pidana, Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1981.
  27. Rosa Agustina, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2003.
  28. Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi juncto Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001.
  29. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol7230/soal-tender-indomobil-ma-batalkan-putusan-pn-dan-kppu, “Soal Tender Indomobil MA Batalkan Putusan Putusan PN dan KPPU,†16 Januari 2003.
  30. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol13157/pengadaan-tinta-pemilu-juga-melanggar-uu-anti-monopoli, “Pengadaan Tinta Pemilu Juga Melanggar UU Anti Monopoliâ€, Akses 5 Maret 2017.
  31. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol15346/kkn-penyakit-yang-menjangkiti-pengadaan-barangjasa-pemerintah-, “KKN, Penyakit yang Menjangkiti Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Kamis,†24 Agustus 2006.
  32. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol15371/masih-ada-dualisme-pengaturan-pengadaan-jasa-konstruksi-, “Masih Ada Dualisme Pengaturan Pengadaan Jasa Konstruksi,†Akses 29 Agustus 2006.
  33. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol18357/persekongkolan-tender-sebagai-suatu-tindakan-yang-anti-persaingan-sehat, “Persekongkolan Tender sebagai Suatu Tindakan yang Anti Persaingan Sehat,†Akses 22 September 2017.
  34. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol5693/lanjutan-kasus-tender-indomobil-di-kejagung-tergantung-ekspose, “Lanjutan kasus tender Indomobil di Kejagung tergantung ekspose,†Akses 22 September 2017.
  35. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol5719/mengurai-benang-kusut-tender-indomobil, “Mengurai Benang Kusut Tender Indomobil,†Akses 21 Februari 2017.
  36. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol7230/soal-tender-indomobil-ma-batalkan-putusan-pn-dan-kppu, “Soal Tender Indomobil MA Batalkan putusan PN dan KPPU,†Akses 22 September 2017.
  37. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4c6424cee54ac/kppu-akan-gandeng-lkpp-atasi-kasus-persekongkolan-tender, “KPPU Akan Gandeng LKPP Atasi Kasus Persekongkolan Tender,†12 Agustus 2010.
  38. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4cf7563e8e446/menkeu-akui-maraknya-korupsi-di-pengadaan-barang-dan-jasa-, “Menkeu Akui Maraknya Korupsi dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa,†02 Desember 2010.
  39. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5105fbb6b7ac6/kppu-nilai-inefisiensi-proyek-pemerintah-rp8-6-t, “KPPU Nilai Inefisiensi Proyek Pemerintah Rp8,6 T,†Akses 28 Januari 2013.
  40. www.kppu.go.id/docs/laporan_tahunan/laporan%20kppu%202009%20230511.pdf, Akses 12 Agustus 2010.
  41. www.kppu.go.id/docs/laporan_tahunan/laporan_tahunan_2008.pdf. Akses 12 Agustus 2010.
  42. www.unisosdem.org/article_printfriendly.php?aid=480&coid=2&caid=30, “Kejagung hentikan penyelidikan Indomobil,†Akses 22 September 2017.

Most read articles by the same author(s)