Article Sidebar

Submitted
20 May 2022
Accepted
10 June 2022
Published
10 June 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 490 Download : 300

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini menguji dan mengembangkan lima dimensi praktik SCM dan menguji hubungan antara praktik SCM, keunggulan kompetitif organisasi, dan  kinerja organisasi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh praktik manajemen rantai pasokan terhadap kinerja organisasi, pengaruh praktik manajemen rantai pasokan terhadap keunggulan kompetitif organisasi, keunggulan kompetitif organisasi terhadap kinerja organisasi, dan keunggulan kompetitif organisasi memediasi pengaruh praktik manajemen rantai pasokan terhadap kinerja organisasi. metode analisis data yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah structural equalition model (SEM). Hasil yang dapat disimpulkan dari penelitian ini adalah praktik manajemen rantai pasokan mempunyai pengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kinerja organisasi, praktik manajemen rantai pasokan mempunyai pengaruh positif signifikan terhadap keunggulan kompetitif organisasi, keunggulan kompetitif organisasi mempunyai pengaruh positif terhadap kinerja organisasi, dan keunggulan kompetitif organisasi mempunyai pengaruh negatif yang tidak signifikan dalam memediasi pengaruh praktik manajemen rantai pasokan terhadap kinerja organisasi.

Keywords

praktik manajemen rantai pasokan keunggulan kompetitif organisasi kinerja organisasi

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Raharja, H. A., & Yamit, Z. (2022). Pengaruh Manajemen Rantai Pasokan terhadap Keunggulan Kompetitif Organisasi dan Kinerja Organisasi Kelompok Ternak di Desa Girikerto. Selekta Manajemen: Jurnal Mahasiswa Bisnis & Manajemen, 1(1), 270–278. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/selma/article/view/23793
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Chai, J. and Ngai, E.W.T. (2020) ‘Decision-making techniques in supplier selection: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead’, Expert Systems with Applications, 140, p.112903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112903.
  2. Darby, J. L., Fugate, B. S., and Murray, J. B. (2019). Interpretive research: A complementary approach to seeking knowledge in supply chain management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2), pp.395-413.
  3. De Guimaraes, J.C.F., Severo, E.A., Henri Dorion, E.C., Coallier, F. and Olea, P.M. (2016), “The use of organizational resources for product innovation and organizational performance: a survey of the Brazilian furniture industry”, International Journal of Production Economics, 180(3), pp. 135-147.
  4. Dubey, R. et al. (2017) ‘Sustainable supply chain management: framework and further research directions’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, pp.1119–1130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.117.
  5. Guarnieri, P., and Trojan, F., (2019). Decision making on supplier selection based on social, ethical, and environmental criteria: a study in the textile industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 141, pp.347–361.
  6. Hair, et al. (2014). A Primer On Partial Least Squares Structural Equation 74 Modeling (PLS-SEM) (1st Ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  7. Hall, D.J. et al. (2012) ‘Inter‐organizational IT use, cooperative attitude, and inter‐organizational collaboration as antecedents to contingency planning effectiveness’, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(1), pp. 50–76. doi:10.1108/09574091211226920.
  8. Heizer, J. and Render, B. (2011) Competitive Advantage from Operations. 7th edn. United States: Pearson Learning Solutions.
  9. Janti, S. (2014) ‘Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Dengan Skala Likert terhadap Pengembangan SI/TI dalam Penentuan Pengambilan Keputusan Penerapan Strategic Planning pada Industri Garmen’, in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Sains & Teknologi (SNAST). Yogyakarta: IST AKPRIND, p. A-155-A-160. Available at: https://journal.akprind.ac.id/index.php/prosidingsnast/article/view/3493.
  10. Li, S. et al. (2006) ‘The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance’, Omega, 34(2), pp. 107–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.002.
  11. Min, S. and Mentzer, J.T. (2004), “Developing and measuring supply chain concepts”, Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), pp.63-99.
  12. Mohammed, A., Harris, I., Soroka, A., and Nujoom, R., (2019). A hybrid MCDM-fuzzy multiobjective programming approach for a G-Resilient supply chain network design. Comput. Ind. Eng. 127, pp.297–312
  13. Mollenkopf, D. et al. (2010) ‘Green, lean, and global supply chains’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. Edited by Á. Halldórsson and G. Kovács, 40(1/2), pp. 14–41. doi:10.1108/09600031011018028.
  14. Nilsson, F. (2019). A complexity perspective on logistics management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(3), pp.681-698.
  15. Qrunfleh, S. and Tarafdar, M. (2014), “Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance”. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, pp. 340-350.
  16. Shashi, S., and Singh, R. (2015). A key performance measures for evaluating cold supply chain performance in farm industry. Management Science Letters, 5(8), pp. 721-738.
  17. Smith, J. et al. (2013) ‘Beyond milk, meat, and eggs: Role of livestock in food and nutrition security’, Animal Frontiers, 3(1), pp. 6–13. doi:10.2527/af.2013-0002.
  18. Uddin, Luva R. H & Hossian M (2013). Impact of Organizational Culture on Employee Performance and Productivity: A Case Study of Telecommunication Sector in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(2), pp.63-77.
  19. Varsei, M., Soosay, C., Fahimnia, B. and Sarkis, J. (2014), “Framing sustainability performance of supply chains with multidimensional indicators”. Supply Chain Management, 19(3), pp. 242-257.
  20. Yakovleva, N., Joseph, S., Thomas, S., (2012). Sustainable benchmarking of supply chains: the case of the food industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), pp.1297–1317.