Article Sidebar

Submitted
15 August 2022
Accepted
16 August 2022
Published
16 August 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 287 Download : 272

Main Article Content

Abstract

Kemajuan globalisasi yang sangat pesat mendorong suatu perusahaan untuk melakukan inovasi yang lebih cepat agar dapat meraih keunggulan kompetitif dari pesaingnya. Hal ini dapat memberikan dampak secara langsung terhadap kualitas perusahaan itu sendiri. Oleh sebab itu, dibutuhkan kecepatan inovasi dan peningkatan creative destruction untuk membentuk daya saing yang tinggi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh kecepatan inovasi terhadap daya saing UMKM dan juga pengaruh mediasi creative destruction antara kecepatan inovasi dan daya saing UMKM pangan di Lampung. Objek penelitian ini adalah UMKM pengolahan pangan di Lampung. Penelitian ini diuji menggunakan Analisis Regresi berganda dan sobel test dengan 60 UMKM pengolahan pangan di Lampung yang dipilih menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah, bahwa kecepatan inovasi berpengaruh positif terhadap daya saing UMKM pangan dan juga terbukti bahwa creative destruction sebagai variabel mediasi berpengaruh positif antara kecepatan inovasi dan daya saing UMKM pangan di Lampung.

Keywords

kecepatan inovasi daya saing UMKM creative destruction

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ardyanti, A., & Nursyamsiah, S. (2022). Pengaruh Kecepatan Inovasi terhadap Daya Saing yang Dimediasi Creative Destruction pada UMKM Pengolahan Pangan di Lampung. Selekta Manajemen: Jurnal Mahasiswa Bisnis & Manajemen, 1(3), 151–167. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/selma/article/view/25157
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Allocca, M.A. and Kessler, E.H. (2006) “Innovation Speed in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(3), pp. 279–295. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00389.x.
  2. Ambastha, A. and Momaya, K. (2012) “Competitiveness of Firms : Review of theory, frameworks and models”, Singapore Management Review, 26(1), pp. 45–61.
  3. Balkin, D.B., Markman, G.D. and Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2000) “Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation?”, Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), pp. 1118–1129. doi:10.2307/1556340.
  4. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., Sambrook, S. and Davies, D. (2012) “Food sector SMEs and innovation types”, British Food Journal, 114(11), pp. 1640–1653. doi:10.1108/00070701211273126.
  5. Bergek, A., Berggren, C., Magnusson, T. and Hobday, M. (2013) “Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation?”, Research Policy, 42(6-7), pp. 1210–1224. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.009.
  6. Bosma, N., Stam, E. and Schutjens, V. (2011) “Creative destruction and regional productivity growth: evidence from the Dutch manufacturing and services industries”, Small Business Economics, 36(4), pp. 401–418. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9257-8.
  7. Boyd, J.L. and Bresser, R.K.F. (2008) “Performance implications of delayed competitive responses: evidence from the U.S. retail industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), pp. 1077–1096. doi:10.1002/smj.710.
  8. Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B. and Wen, C.-T. (2006) “The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan”, Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), pp. 331–339. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5.
  9. Freel, M. (2006) “Patterns of Technological Innovation in Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services”, Industry & Innovation, 13(3), pp. 335–358. doi:10.1080/13662710600859157.
  10. Ghozali, I. (2018) Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  11. Gilbert, B.A. (2012) “Creative destruction: Identifying its geographic origins”, Research Policy, 41(4), pp. 734–742. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.11.005.
  12. Huang, X., Soutar, G.N. and Brown, A. (2002) “New Product Development Processes in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Some Australian Evidence”, Journal of Small Business Management, 40(1), pp. 27–42. doi:10.1111/1540-627x.00036.
  13. Hutahayan, B. and Yufra, S. (2019) “Innovation speed and competitiveness of food small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) in Malang, Indonesia”, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(5), pp. 1152–1173. doi:10.1108/jstpm-12-2017-0071.
  14. Kessler, E.H., Allocca, M.A. and Rahman, N. (2007) “External Knowledge Accession and Innovation Speed in the Small and Medium Sized Enterprise (SME)”, Small Enterprise Research, 15(1), pp. 1–21. doi:10.1080/13215906.2007.11005829.
  15. Kessler, E.H. and Chakrabarti, A.K. (1996) “Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes”, Academy of Management Review, 21(4), pp. 1143–1191. doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9704071866.
  16. Kivimaa, P. and Kern, F. (2016) “Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions’, Research Policy, 45(1), pp. 205–217. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008.
  17. Love, J.H. and Roper, S. (2007) Innovation, Productivity and Growth: An Analysis of Irish Data’, in Susman, G. I. (ed.) Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Global Economy. Chettenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  18. Neely, A. and Hii, J. (1998) Innovation and Business Performance : A Literature Review. Cambridge: The Judge Institute of Management Studies University of Cambridge.
  19. Putri, A.I. (2020). Pengaruh Kecepatan Inovasi Terhadap Daya Saing Dengan Creative destruction Sebagai Mediator Pada UMKM Pengolahan Pangan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. [online] Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta. Available at: http://etd.eprints.ums.ac.id.
  20. Rostek, K. (2012) “The reference model of competitiveness factors for SME medical sector”, Economic Modelling, 29(5), pp.2039–2048. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.03.002.
  21. Sekaran, U. (2006) Research Methods for Business (Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis). Buku 2. 4th edn. Jakarta. [online] Salemba Empat. Available at: http://kc.umn.ac.id.
  22. Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2013) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 6th edn. New York: Wiley.
  23. Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations: With a New Introduction. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
  24. Taneo, S.Y.M., Hadiwidjojo, D., Sunaryo, S. and Sudjatno, S. (2020) “Creative destruction and knowledge creation as the mediation between innovation speed and competitiveness of food small and medium-sized enterprises in Malang, Indonesia”, Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 30(2), pp. 195–218. doi:10.1108/cr-12-2017-0090.
  25. Tidd, J. and Bessant, J. (2009) Managing Innovation, Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change. 4th edn. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  26. Tushman, M.L. and Anderson, P. (1986) “Technological Discon- tinuities and Organiza- tional Environments Philip Anderson”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), pp. 439–465.
  27. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2018 Tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah

Most read articles by the same author(s)