Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 2, 2016
Published
June 2, 2016
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 602 Download : 870

Main Article Content

Abstract

An agression used by USA and its allies to Irak is apparanthy not legal for the absence strong legal arguments. The inclusion ofthe use ofthe UN Resolution No. 627 and 1441, the pre-emptive strike and anticipatory self-defence are obviously contravene againts the international obligations and the general principle of international accepted by civilized
nations. As a result ofthe invalidity ofwar, the USA andits allies cannot escape from legal responsibility. Not only because its military aggression was not permitted by the Security Council, butalso because the role ofmilitar troops did hotcomply the demand ofthe 1948 Geneva Convention. Thousand civilians of Iraq aiid'public facilities were ruined toprove in significant that USA should take responsibility both collectively or individually, especially in treating bodly prisoners in Guantanamo andAbu Ghraib.

Keywords

agression USA Irak

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author Biography

Jawahir Thontowi, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Fakultas Hukum
How to Cite
Thontowi, J. (2016). Legalitas Perang Irak Dan Perianggungjawabannya Dalam Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 12(30), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol12.iss30.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Antonio Cassese, International Criminal Law,
  2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 0. Noorgard,
  3. The Position of the Individualin In
  4. ternational Law, Copenhagen: Munsks-172
  5. Thontowi. Legalitas Perang Irak Dan Pertanggungjawabannya...
  6. gaard, 1962. Ewan Macaskill dan Julian Borger, Iraq WarwasIllegal and Breached
  7. UN Charter, Says Annan, dalam the Guardian, 16 September 2004.
  8. Christine Gray, The Use ofForce andthe International Legal Order', dalam Malcolm D. Evans (ed.), Intemationaliaw, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. hh. 299-325.
  9. Hilary Charlesworth &Andrew Byrnes No ThisWar is llegal .March 2003, The age Coman (1-2)
  10. Hanung Hasballah, Perlakuan TerhadapTawanan Perang Dalam Perspektif Hukum Humaniter Internasional dan Hukum Islam. Skripsi S-1 Fakultas Hukum Ull Yogyakarta. 2005
  11. Henry J. Steinerdan Philip Alston, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Moral, New York: Oxford University
  12. Press, 1996. bab I,
  13. James Crawford dan Simon Olleson, 'The Nature and Forms of Intemational Responsibility', dalam Malcolm D. Evans
  14. (ed.), International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press,2003.
  15. John C. Yoo, InternationalLawand the Warin Iraq, dalam www.yale.edu. Greg Hunt, 'Yes the War is Legal', dalam theAge
  16. Maret 2003.
  17. John Yoo: Profesor Law, University California at Berkeley. International Law and The warin Iraq. Deputy Assistance Attorney
  18. General office og Legal Consel, US. Department of Justice, 2001-2002.
  19. KeirStarmer, 'Sorry, Mr. Blair, but 1441 doesnotAuthorise Force', dalam the Guardian17 Maret 2003.
  20. Lord Goldsmith the Guardian 17 Maret 2003. Martin Dixon dan Robert McCorquodale, Cases and Materials on Intemational Law, Ox
  21. ford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  22. Putri Nina Rokhmaniati. Invasi Ameiika Serikat Terhadap Irak Menurut Hukum Internasional. Skripsi S-1 FH Ull 2004. Hal 6.
  23. Raymond Whitaker dan Robert Verkalk, Revealed: Attorney General Changed His Advice on Legaiity of Iraq War, dalam the Independent 29 Februari 2004.
  24. Robert Verkalk, '"Illegal War" could mean Soldiers Face Prosecution', dalam the Independent, 12 Maret 2003.
  25. Tessa Rahma Annisa. Legalitas PenggunaanDoktrin pre-emption. Dalam HukumInternasional: Studi Kasus Invasi AS ke Irak. Skripsi S-1.Fakultas Hukum Ull. Yogyakarta 2004. Hal. 101.
  26. William A. Schabas, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  27. www.un.orQ/secureworld
  28. www.un.Gra/law/ilc www.un.ora
  29. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company Limited Case (Belgia vs. Spanyol) (Second Phase) ICJ Rep (1970) 3.
  30. Robert McCorquodale, 'The Individual and theInternational Legal System', dalam Malcolm
  31. Jawa Pas Kamis 5 Mei 2005.
  32. Tempo Jum'at 29 April 2005
  33. Kompas, 1 April 2005
  34. Republika, 29 April 2005
  35. Republika, Jum'at 29 April 2005

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>