Article Sidebar
Submitted
June 9, 2016
Published
June 9, 2016
Download
Statistic
Read Counter :
454
Download : 1544
Main Article Content
Abstract
Political practice, both in the periods of the Old Regime and New Regime, did not reflect the implementation of Rule of Law principles. Government system tended to be constitutionalism authoritarian, indicated by an abundance of legislation justfying government policies. The amandement of the Constitution of 1945, There fore, has been relevantin the era of globalization not only for the sake ofhuman right protection, good relationship
among of ethnics, religions and groups as well as of universal values, but also for the sake of greater as surance to form the supremacy of law.
among of ethnics, religions and groups as well as of universal values, but also for the sake of greater as surance to form the supremacy of law.
Keywords
Political practice
Rule of Law
government
ethnics
supremacy of law
Article Details
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
Thontowi, J. (2016). Relevansi Amandemen UUD 1945 terhadap Tuntutan Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 6(12), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol6.iss12.art8
