Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 8, 2016
Published
June 8, 2016
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 432 Download : 500

Main Article Content

Abstract

In theoretic perspective for constructionism, each of the parties involved in the process on criminai court is suitable with the position andthe roie of each the process for criminal court it self would make ideas to decide for their own objectives andto act as according to the objectives assigned deliberateiy. In doing this action, then they give the meaning to their action or behaviour and as well as they will give thereasons about theaction to carry
out. The consequence isthe raising on different meaning. These writings describe about the innovation oflaw on criminal procedure in the frame of Human Right in the theoretical perspective of constructionism.

Keywords

theoretic perspective for constructionism human right

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Setiawan, M. A. (2016). Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Berwawasan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Perspektif Teori Konstrusionisme. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 9(20), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss20.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Black, Donald. Tt. Sociological Justice: Introduction and the Boundaries of Legal Sociology. Foto Copy. Tp.
  2. Rahardjo, Sartjipto. Materi Kuliah. Pada Program Doktor llmu Hukum
  3. Universitas Diponegoro. 7 Maret 2002.
  4. Reksodiputro, Mardjono. 1994. Sistem Peradiian Pidana dalam Perspektif HakAsasi Manusia. Jakarta: Lembaga Kriminologi Universitas Indonesia.
  5. Setiawan, Arief. "Proses Peradiian Pidana di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia: Studi Khusus tentang Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Bagi Tersangka dalam
  6. Proses Pemeriksaan Pendahuiuan. Tesis. Jakarta. 1996. Tidak Diterbitkan.
  7. Waters, Malcom. 1994. Modern Sociologi cal Theory. London: Sage
  8. Publications Ltd.