Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 23, 2017
Published
January 23, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2093 Download : 2843

Main Article Content

Abstract

The problems of this research are: Firs of all, the influence of freedom of contract paradigm toward the binding forces of contact principle; secondly, the philosophical basis he binding forces of contact principle. To discus those problem, this research uses normative and comparative philosophical-juridical-normative approach. This research is a literary research, the legal matters are analyzed qualitatively using normative and juridical approach. This research concludes: First, under the influence of freedom of contract or freedom of will paradigm, the basis of system of law in justifying the basis of binding forces and performance of contract are obtained; Second, the sanctity of contract is one of the teaching followed by classic theory of contract law as a direct result of freedom of contract. The philosophical basis of binding forces in Islamic Law is derived directly from Al Quran.

Keywords

Philosopical basic freedom of contract beinding force.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khairandy, R. (2017). Landasan Filosofis Kekuatan Mengikatnya Kontrak. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 18, 36–55. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/7232
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Daftar Pustaka
  2. Allan, David E, et.al, eds. Asian Contract Law: A Survey of Current Problems. Melbourne University Press, Victoria, 1969.
  3. Alim. The World’s Mose Useful Islamic Software (CD-ROM). ISL Software Corp, USA 1986 – 2000.
  4. Arguelles. Luis Muniz. “A Theory on the Will Theory: Freedom of Contract in Historical and Comparative Perspectiveâ€, Revista Juridica De La Universidad De Puerto Rico.
  5. Atiyah, P.S. An Introduction to the Law of Contract. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1981.
  6. ______, Atiyah, P.S. The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988.
  7. Buckley, F.H., ed. The Fall and Rise of Freedom of Contract. Duke, University Press Durham, 1999.
  8. Calamari, John dan Joseph M.Perillo. Contracts. St. Paul. Minn: West Publishing Company, 1977.
  9. Denzin, Norman K. dan Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds, Hanbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publication, London, 1994
  10. Dunne, van J.M. Verbintenissenrecht, Deel 1, Contarctenrecht, 1e gedelte. Kluwer, Deventer, 1993.
  11. Feinman, Jay M. “The Significance of Contract Theoryâ€, Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 58, 1990.
  12. Friedman, G.H.L. “On the Nature of Contractâ€, Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 17, 1993.
  13. Friedman, Lawrence M, American Law, W.W. Norton & Co. London, 1984
  14. Fuller, Lon L. dan Melvin Aron Eisenberg. Basic Contract Law. West Publishing Co, St.Paul-Minn, 1972.
  15. Gluck, George. “Standard Form Contract: The Contract Theory Reconsideredâ€, International Law and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 28, January 1979.
  16. Gillies, Peter. Business Law. The Federation Press, Sydney, 1993.
  17. Gilmore, Grant. The Death of Contract. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, 1995.
  18. Gordley, James. “Myths of French Civil Codeâ€, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 42, 1994.
  19. Goode, Roy, “The Concept of “Good Faith†in English Lawâ€, www.cnr.it/ CRDC.frames2.htm.
  20. Guest. A.G, Chity on Contract, Volume I – General Principles. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1983.
  21. Haanappel P.P.C. dan Ejan Mackaay. Niewe Nederlands Burgerlijk Wetboek Het Vermogensrecht. Kluwer, Deventer, 1990.
  22. Harbachy, Saba, “Property, Right, and Contract in Muslim Law,†Columbia law Review, Vol. 62, 1962.
  23. Haqqi, Abdurrakhman Raden Aji, The Philosophy of Islamic Law of Transactions. CERT Publication Sdn. Bhd, Kuala Lumpur, 2009.
  24. Haris, Donald dan Dennis Tallon, eds., Contact Law Today, Anglo-French Comparison, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989.
  25. Hartkamp, A.S. Mr. C. Asser’s Handleiding tot Beoepening van het Nederlands Burgerlijk Rechts, Verbintenissenrecht, Dell II, Algemene Leer der Overeenkomsten. W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink BV, Zwolle, 1989.
  26. Hartkamp, Arthur S, dan Marianne M.M. Tillema. Contract Law in the Netherlands. Kluwer, Deventer 1993.
  27. Hasaan, Abd El Wahab El. “Freedom of Contract, the Doctrine of Frustration, and Sanctity of Contract in Sudan Law and Islamic Lawâ€, Arab Law Quarterly, Vol. 1 Part 1, 1995.
  28. Horwitz, Morton J, “The Historical Foundation of Modern Contract Lawâ€, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 87, 1974.
  29. J. Messe, Alan, “Liberty and Antitrust in the Formative Eraâ€, Boston University Law Review, Vol. 79, 1999.
  30. Kessler, Fredrich. “Contract Adhesion – Some Thought about Freedom of Contractâ€, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 43, 1943.
  31. Kutty, Faisal, “The Sharia Factor in International Commercial Arbitration, “ The Loyola of Los Angeles and Comparative Law, Vol. 28, 2006.
  32. Leage, R.W, Roman Private Law Founded on the Institues of Gaius and Justian. Macmillan and Co, London, 1920.
  33. Mehren, Arthur Talylor von. The Civil Law System, Cases and Materials. Prentice Hall Inc, Engellwood, N.J., 1957.
  34. Mehren, Taylor vom, dan James Russel Gordley. The Civil Law System. Little Brown and Company, Boston, 1977.
  35. Murray, Edward. Muray on Contract. The Michie Company, Charlottesvillie, 1990.
  36. Murray, Kyle T. “Looking for Lochner in All the Wrong Paces: The Iowa Supreme Court and Substantive Due Process Reviewâ€, Iowa Law Review, Vol 84 (1999).
  37. Passer, Max. Romaiches Privatrecht. University of South Africa, Pretoria, 1984.
  38. Pollack, Ervin H. Jurisprudence. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, 1979.
  39. Pound, Roscoe,â€Liberty of Contractâ€, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 19, 1909.
  40. Qadri, Anwar A, Islamic Jurisprudence in the Modern World. Taj Company, New Delhi, 1986.
  41. Rayner, S.E, The Theory of Contracts in Islamic Law: A Comparative Analysis with Particular Reference to the Modern Legislation in Kuwait , Bahrain, and United Arab Emirates. Graham Trotman, London, 1991.
  42. Rosenfeld, Michael. “Contract and Justice: The Relation between Classical Contract Law and Social Contract Theoryâ€, Iowa Law Review, Vol. 70, 1985.
  43. Ryan, K.W. An Introduction to the Civil Law. The Law Book of Australasia, Brisbane, 1962.
  44. Schalesinger, Rudolf B. ed. Formation of Contract: A Study of the Common Core of Legal System. Stevens & Sons, London, 1968.
  45. Sharma, K.M. “From Sabctity to Fairness: An Easy Transition in the Law of Contract?†New York Law School Journal of International Law & Comparative Law, Vol. 18, 1999.
  46. Stankiewicz, James J, “Good Faith Obligation in the Uniforn Commercial Code: Problem in Determining Its Meaning and Evaluating Its Effectâ€, Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 7, 1973.
  47. Swan, John dan Barry J. Reiter. Contract: Cases and Materials. Emont Montgomery, Canada, 1985.
  48. Tabor, Charles, “Dusting off The Code: Using History to Find Equity in Louisiana Contract Law, “ Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 68, 2008.
  49. Thomas, J.A.C, Textbook of Roman Law. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1976.
  50. The Netherlands Ministry of Justice. The Netherlands Civil Code, Book 6 the Law of Obligation Draft Text and Commentarary. Sijthoff, Leyden, 1977.
  51. Tumbuan, Fred B.G. “Kekuatan Mengikat Perjanjian dan Batas-Batasnyaâ€. Makalah, Jakarta, Juli 1988.
  52. Watson, Alan, Roman Law & Comparative Law. University of Georgia Press Athens, 1995.
  53. Zimmermann, Reinhard dan Simon Whittaker, eds. Good Faith in European Contract Law. Kluwer, Deventer, 2000.
  54. Zimmermann, Reinhard. The Law of Obligation, Roman Foundation of Rule Civilian Tradition, Juta & Co. Ltd, Cape Town, 1992.
  55. ______, “Roman-Dutch Jurisprudence and its Contribution to European Private Lawâ€, Tulane Law Review, Vol. 66, 1992.
  56. Zweight, Konrad, dan Hein Kotz. Introduction to Comparative Law Volume II – The Institution of Private Law. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987.
  57. ______, Introduction to Comparative Law. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>