Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 13, 2018
Published
January 17, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 633 Download : 1529

Main Article Content

Abstract

One of the reasons to involve the House of Representatives to take the position of Chief Justice and Constitutional Judges after the amendment to the 1945 Constitution is the phenomenon of the House’s empowerment in the Indonesian constitutional system during the transition to democracy through the amendment. Such involvement can potentially cause problems, for example, the decisive authority of the  House  of  Representatives  in  selecting  the  Chief  Justice  and  constitutional  judges,  leading  to politicization problem. This research formulates the following issues, first, the reasons for involving the House of Representatives in filling in the position of Chief Justice and Constitutional Judges. Second, whether the involvement is in accordance with the principle of separation of power as well as check and balance. This study is normative research with secondary data sources derived from legal materials, with  conceptual,  case,  and  statutory  approaches.  The  results  show  that  first,  the  involvement  of  the House of Representatives for Chief Justice and Constitutional Judges positions is part of the process of democracy beginning after the New Order transition period. Second, The involvement is also a deviationfrom the principle of separation of power, and such practice does not even reflect the principle of check and balance because the House of Representatives dominates all the selection processes.

Keywords

The house of representatives democracy separation of power check and balance

Article Details

How to Cite
puspitasari, sri hastuti. (2019). Pelibatan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dalam Pengisian Jabatan Hakim Agung dan Hakim Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(3), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss3.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Beetham, David (edt) Defining and Measuring Democrcy, Sage Publication, Ltd London, 1994.
  3. Cunningham, Frunk, Theories Of Democracy: A Critical Introduction, Routledge, New York, 2002.
  4. Ehrmann, Henry W. (edt), Democracy in Changing Society, Frederick A Preager Publishers, USA, 1964.
  5. Held, David, Models of Democracy, Third Edition, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008.
  6. Irianto, Sulistyowati dan Shidarta (editor), buku bunga rampai berjudul Metode Penelitian Hukum, Konstelasi dan Refleksi, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2009.
  7. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Edisi pertama, Cetakan ke- 4, Jakarta, 2008.
  8. Montesquieu,The Spirit Of Law, (De I’esprit Des lois), terjemahan Anne M.Cohler et all, Fisrt Publication, Cambridge University Press, UK, 1989.
  9. O’Donnel, Gullermo dan Philippe Schmitter, Transisi Menuju Demokrasi (Transition To Democracy), Cetakan pertama, LP3ES, Jakarta, 1993.
  10. Pane, Nina dkk, Mencari Sosok Ideal Hakim Agung Indonesia, Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, 2017
  11. Wade, E.C.S and G. Godfrey Phillips, Constitutional Law, An Outline of The Law and Practice of The Constitution, Including Central and Locaal Government and The Constitutional Relations Of The British Commonwealth, New Impression, Longmans, Green and Co, Great Britain, London, 1957.
  12. Warrren, Harris G., Harry D. Leinenweber, Ruth O.M. Andersen, Our Democracy at Work, Prentice-Hall,Inc, USA, 1963.
  13. Jurnal dan Hasil Penelitian
  14. Beetham, David, “Parliament and Democracy In The Twenty-First Century, Inter-Parliamentary Union”, 2006. Diakses dari archive.ipu.org//pdf/ publications/democracy_en.pdf, tanggal 14 November 2017
  15. Gerangelos, Peter A, dalam “The Separation Power and Legislative Interfence in Pending Cases”, artikel dalam Sydney Law Review Vol.30:61, Tahun 2008, diakses dari :www%.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/sydLawRw/2008/ 3.html, diakses 7 September 2018.
  16. Harijanti, Susi Dwi, “Pengisian Jabatan Hakim: Kebutuhan Reformasidan Pengekangan Diri”, artikel dalam Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 21, No. 4, Yogyakarta, Oktober 2015.
  17. Indramayu, Jayus, dan Rosita Indrayati, 2016,“Rekonseptualisasi Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hakim Konstitusi yang Berkualifikasi”, artikel dalam e-Jurnal Lentera Hukum, Volume 4.Issue I, hlm 1, 8-12, diakses dari https://journal.unej.ac.id/index.php/eJLH/ article/download/5267/3986/, 7 Juli 2018
  18. Johnson, John K. and Robert T. Nakamura, “A Concept Paper on Legislatures and Good Governance”, makalah untuk UNDP, hlm 1-5, diakses dari https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a8f1/f6d8a90d97bff63c3ac166f91d4e0b187260.pdf, 7 Sepetmebr 2018.
  19. Marc F. Plattner,” Globalization and Self Government”, artikel dalam Journal Of Democracy Volume 13 July, 2002, hlm. 59. Diakses dari https://www.journaldemocracy.org/sites/default/files/Plattner.pdf, tanggal 19 Mei 2017.
  20. Nugroho, Kris,”Konsolidasi Demokrasi”, artikel dalam Jurnal Masyarakat dan Politik, Th XIV. No 2, April 2001.
  21. Savitri, Diah, “Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Pengangkatan Hakim Agung”, artikel dalam Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. I No. 2 Desember 2013.
  22. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  23. Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
  24. Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 1,2/PUU-XII/2014,Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2014, diakses dari www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id, diakses 13 September, 2017.
  25. Republik Indonesia, Dokumen Sidang Komisi III DPR RI tentang Pengusulan Calon Hakim Konstitusi Usulan DPR RI, 2003, 2008, 2009, 2013, 2014, dan 2018, Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI, Jakarta, 2018.
  26. Website
  27. Gyong, John Emmanuel,”Good Governance and Accountability in a Democarcy”, diakses paperity.org/p/59183688/good-governance-and-accountability-in-a-democracy. Tanggal 22 Mei 2018.
  28. Hutchinson, Terry and Nigel Duncen,”Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research”, Quensland University of Technology, Deakin University School of Law, 2012, diakses dari eprints.qut.edu.au/54819/2/54801.pdf, tangggal 26 Desember 2015.
  29. Longley, Robert,” Separation of Power and Check and Balance in U.S Constitution”, diakses dari https://www.thoughtco.com/separation-of-powers-3322394, 13 Juli 2018.
  30. Urbinati, Nadia, ”Political Representation As A Democratic Process”, diakses dari www.rediscriptions.if/media/upload/.../Urbinati_06_pdf, tanggal 7 September 2018.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>